Notebookcheck Logo

unknown vs WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs Telechips TCC8803 1GHz

unknown

► remove from comparison

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz

► remove from comparison TCC8803 1GHz

ARM Mali 2D/3D graphics accelerator, DDR / DDR2 / LP-DDR2 / LP-DDR2 memory interface, LVDS Transmitter, HDMI 1.4, Composite TV-Out (NTSC / PAL), USB 2.0 HS OTG, USB 2.0 host, USB 1.1 HOST, EHI (External Host Interface), UART, NAND Flash Interface

Telechips' TCC88xx application processor will redefine the mobile device of tomorrow with new' innovative user experience by PC-like web browsing, 1080p full HD video record & playback, intuitive user interfaces, location based services and next generation social networking applications. TCC88xx supports development of planned features for the Tablet PC and HMP of tomorrow with tremendous performance and programmability to support new applications yet to be imagined. TCC88xx is equipped with hardwired VPU/GPU/ISP to maximize multimedia experience at its peak level.

 

show full text
ModelunknownWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950Telechips TCC8803 1GHz
Series
Serie:
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown «  cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Architecturex86ARMARM
CodenameCortex-A9
Clock1000 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 1
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP
Announced
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.tw
Technology65 nm

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 unknown +
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
37732 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
5778 Points (68%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1343 Points (34%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
4370 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1006 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
3951 Points (7%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 unknown +
13 MFLOPS (0%)
238%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
13.4 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
min: 836.4     avg: 10153     median: 14670 (17%)     max: 14953 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
7004 ms (66%)
291%
1 WM8950 +
2410 ms (23%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 13727     median: 2773.5 (2%)     max: 46687 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 unknown +
160 Points (45%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 unknown +
200 Points (37%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
714538 Points (43%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 unknown +
197906 Points (54%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 unknown +
13858 Points (58%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 unknown +
1028 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 unknown +
9.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 unknown +
5.5 Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks unknown → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 293% n=1

Average Benchmarks Telechips TCC8803 1GHz → 104% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 16. 19:31:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 3327 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731781863s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.114s ... 0.117s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.118s

#11 got single benchmarks 3778 +0s ... 0.118s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3327 +0.001s ... 0.119s

#13 got single benchmarks 3327 +0.003s ... 0.122s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.122s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.132s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.133s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.133s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)