unknown vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core Ultra 5 125H ist eine gehobene Mittelklasse-CPU der Meteor-Lake-H-Serie die im Dezember 2023 vorgestellt wurde. Der SoC setzt zum ersten Mal auf ein Tile/Chiplet-Design. Der Compute-Tile bietet 4 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Redwood Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Crestmont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 18 Threads) und takten bis 4,5 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten mit maximal 3,6 GHz. Zusätzlich gibt es nun noch zwei weitere Low-Power-Efficiency-Kerne auf der Low-Power-Island, im Leerlauf und bei einfachen Aufgaben kann der Compute-Tile daher komplett deaktiviert werden, um Strom zu sparen.
Performance
Mit Meteor-Lake-P wird die bisherige Architektur weiter verbessert, es gibt aber keine grundlegenden Änderungen. Die Leistung ist daher auch nur geringfügig höher als bei den Raptor-Lake-Prozessoren.
Grafikeinheit
Der Core Ultra 5 125H bietet eine neue ARC-iGPU mit 7 Xe-Kernen und 112 der 128 EUs, die maximal 2,2 GHz erreichen. Die Leistung gegenüber der alten Iris Xe Graphics G7 mit 96 EUs konnte dabei deutlich gesteigert werden.
Features
Meteor Lake-H hat WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) integriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt jetzt LPDDR5/x-7467 (max. 64 GB) oder DDR5-5600 (max. 96 GB). Es kommt nun eine dedizierte NPU (2x Gen3 Neural Compute Engines) zum Einsatz. Die Xe Media Engine unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode bis zu 8K 10-Bit HDR. Der Chip unterstützt jetzt PCIe-5.0 (x8 für GPU) und PCIe-4.0 (drei x12 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core Ultra 5 125H ist mit 28 Watt TDP (Base) und 64 Watt bzw. 115 Watt (PL2) max. Turbo Power angegeben. Meteor Lake besteht aus fünf einzelnen Chips, wobei der Prozessorteil im neuen Intel 4 Prozess (7nm) gefertigt wird. Die Grafikeinheit wird bei TSMC in N5 produziert und SoC und I/O-Tile im älteren N6 Prozess. Diese 4 Chips werden dann per Foveros-Verfahren auf den 22nm Base-Tile aufgebracht.
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ist eine High-End-CPU der Meteor-Lake-H-Serie die im Dezember 2023 vorgestellt wurde. Der SoC setzt zum ersten Mal auf ein Tile/Chiplet-Design. Der Compute-Tile bietet 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Redwood Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Crestmont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 22 Threads) und takten bis 5,1 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten mit maximal 3,8 GHz. Zusätzlich gibt es nun noch zwei weitere Low-Power-Efficiency-Kerne auf der Low-Power-Island, im Leerlauf und bei einfachen Aufgaben kann der Compute-Tile daher komplett deaktiviert werden, um Strom zu sparen.
Performance
Mit Meteor-Lake-P wird die bisherige Architektur weiter verbessert, es gibt aber keine grundlegenden Änderungen. Die Leistung ist daher auch nur geringfügig höher als bei den Raptor-Lake-Prozessoren. Im Vergleich zum Core Ultra 7 165H , bietet der U9 185H nur einen 100 MHz höheren Boost takt der CPU und 50 MHz bei der iGPU.
Grafikeinheit
Der Core Ultra 9 185H bietet eine neue ARC-iGPU mit 8 Xe-Kernen und 128 EUs, die maximal 2,35 GHz erreichen. Die Leistung gegenüber der alten Iris Xe Graphics G7 mit 96 EUs konnte ungefähr verdoppelt werden.
Features
Meteor Lake-H hat WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) integriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt jetzt LPDDR5/x-7467 (max. 64 GB) oder DDR5-5600 (max. 96 GB). Es kommt nun eine dedizierte NPU (2x Gen3 Neural Compute Engines) zum Einsatz. Die Xe Media Engine unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode bis zu 8K 10-Bit HDR. Der Chip unterstützt jetzt PCIe-5.0 (x8 für GPU) und PCIe-4.0 (drei x12 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ist mit 28 Watt TDP (Base) und 64 Watt bzw. 115 Watt (PL2) max. Turbo Power angegeben. Meteor Lake besteht aus fünf einzelnen Chips, wobei der Prozessorteil im neuen Intel 4 Prozess (7nm) gefertigt wird. Die Grafikeinheit wird bei TSMC in N5 produziert und SoC und I/O-Tile im älteren N6 Prozess. Diese 4 Chips werden dann per Foveros-Verfahren auf den 22nm Base-Tile aufgebracht.
Model unknown Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Series Intel Meteor Lake-H Intel Meteor Lake-H Serie: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H Architecture x86 x86 x86 Codename Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H Clock 3600 - 4500 MHz 3800 - 5100 MHz L3 Cache 18 MB 24 MB Cores / Threads 14 / 18 4 x 4.5 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core 8 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core 2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core 16 / 22 6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core 8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core 2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core TDP 28 Watt 45 Watt Technology 7 nm 7 nm max. Temp. 110 °C 110 °C Socket BGA2049 BGA2049 Features DDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Essen., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA DDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA iGPU Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 5 125H
35.9 pt (60%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
39.3 pt (65%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 97 avg: 100.2 median: 100 (56%) max: 102.2 Points
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 98% 98% 100% 95% 100%
min: 103 avg: 108 median: 108 (61%) max: 112.2 Points
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 115 W 90% 90% 95% 87% 92% 100% 95% 98% 96%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 331 avg: 638 median: 668 (12%) max: 815 Points
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 41% 69% 82% 100% 100%
min: 828 avg: 1003 median: 1021 (19%) max: 1096 Points
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 115 W 31% 53% 76% 76% 77% 100% 99% 96% 93%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9194 avg: 12308 median: 12804.5 (12%) max: 14564 Points
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 63% 68% 87% 89% 100% 100%
min: 12688 avg: 17979 median: 18473 (17%) max: 19851 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 96% 64% 46% 50% 64% 79% 73% 86% 73% 94% 78% 97% 100% 97% 93% 90% 92% 89%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1549 avg: 1668 median: 1682.5 (72%) max: 1735 Points
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 89% 99% 95% 100% 95% 99%
min: 1620 avg: 1827 median: 1838 (78%) max: 1912 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 98% 95% 81% 89% 87% 93% 86% 93% 90% 98% 80% 97% 100% 94% 97% 100% 85% 92%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 622 avg: 643 median: 644 (71%) max: 664 Points
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 99% 99% 95% 100% 95% 94%
min: 622 avg: 704 median: 709 (79%) max: 735 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 98% 94% 89% 89% 86% 93% 86% 93% 85% 98% 80% 96% 100% 97% 97% 100% 85% 96%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3673 avg: 4766 median: 4908.5 (12%) max: 5618 Points
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 65% 69% 87% 88% 100% 100%
min: 4843 avg: 6914 median: 7194 (18%) max: 7651 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 95% 63% 48% 51% 64% 78% 73% 84% 73% 96% 79% 97% 100% 97% 94% 88% 93% 91%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1029 avg: 1038 median: 1038 (7%) max: 1047 Points
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown Win10 1029 Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown macOS 1047
min: 1700 avg: 1983 median: 2053.5 (13%) max: 2245 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 46% 76% 76% 95% 88% 100% 95%
min: 1581.9 avg: 2739 median: 2801.5 (18%) max: 3165 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 58% 73% 54% 54% 68% 79% 71% 89% 68% 89% 76% 100% 95% 94% 90% 86% 90% 90%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 235 avg: 243.8 median: 246.5 (69%) max: 251 Points
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 98% 98% 94% 100% 94% 99%
min: 238 avg: 267.1 median: 268 (75%) max: 281 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 98% 93% 88% 88% 84% 92% 84% 91% 88% 97% 84% 96% 100% 95% 97% 100% 85% 93%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 21.9 avg: 25.6 median: 26.7 (34%) max: 27.02 Points
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 81% 98% 100% 100%
min: 33.95 avg: 34.6 median: 34.3 (44%) max: 35.55 Points
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 62% 74% 97% 76% 76% 95% 100% 98%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.86 avg: 2.9 median: 2.9 (70%) max: 3.03 Points
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 98% 96% 94% 100%
min: 3.11 avg: 3.2 median: 3.1 (74%) max: 3.27 Points
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 91% 89% 96% 87% 93% 100% 95% 96%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8948 avg: 9295 median: 9334.5 (56%) max: 9561 Points
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 98% 97% 94% 100%
min: 9719 avg: 10069 median: 10188 (62%) max: 10300 Points
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 91% 90% 94% 87% 93% 100% 99% 95%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 45559 avg: 50476 median: 51477.5 (37%) max: 53390 Points
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 85% 96% 97% 100%
min: 59935 avg: 62161 median: 61959 (45%) max: 64588 Points
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 68% 76% 92% 77% 79% 89% 96% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 78788 avg: 78803 median: 78802.5 (50%) max: 78817 Points
CPU TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 100% 100%
min: 88902 avg: 90478 median: 90978 (58%) max: 91553 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 99% 86% 85% 96% 99% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12858 avg: 13070 median: 13069.5 (16%) max: 13281 Points
CPU TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 97% 100%
min: 13997 avg: 14232 median: 14325 (17%) max: 14374 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 97% 89% 92% 100% 100% 97%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 148.994 avg: 231 median: 247 (3%) max: 296.9 s
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 100% 101% 102%
min: 91.954 avg: 247.6 median: 228.6 (3%) max: 441.275 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 102% 102% 103% 102% 104% 100% 104% 104%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4.107 avg: 6 median: 4.5 (1%) max: 9.5 s
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 100% 101% 101%
min: 3.254 avg: 4.6 median: 3.5 (1%) max: 8.1 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
min: 5594 avg: 7773 median: 6209 (10%) max: 13080 Points
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 100% 47% 43% 48%
min: 6724 avg: 10271 median: 8251.5 (13%) max: 17856 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 73% 34% 48% 31% 35% 44% 38% 43%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
0 MIPS (0%)
min: 52522 avg: 69758 median: 71843 (41%) max: 76331 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 95% 69% 84% 89% 96% 81% 97% 100% 99% 95% 93% 88% 91%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4663 avg: 4948 median: 5043 (59%) max: 5136 MIPS
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 99% 99% 91% 97% 91% 100%
min: 4502 avg: 5455 median: 5539.5 (65%) max: 5781 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 98% 97% 88% 88% 81% 94% 81% 95% 89% 98% 86% 86% 100% 95% 94% 94% 78% 99%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 129.6 avg: 132 median: 132.3 (44%) max: 134 fps
CPU TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 97% 100% 99%
min: 158.2 avg: 161.8 median: 161.5 (54%) max: 165.6 fps
CPU TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 78% 98% 81% 80% 96% 100% 93%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 304.5 avg: 306.1 median: 305.3 (70%) max: 308.5 fps
CPU TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 99% 99% 100%
min: 300.5 avg: 324.2 median: 335.5 (77%) max: 336.5 fps
CPU TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 91% 100% 90% 92% 100% 89% 94%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.7 avg: 13.4 median: 13.8 (24%) max: 16.7 fps
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 58% 63% 82% 83% 100% 94%
min: 14.1 avg: 20.1 median: 20.8 (37%) max: 22.7 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 94% 62% 43% 47% 60% 73% 74% 76% 69% 95% 80% 97% 100% 98% 92% 91% 91% 87%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.817 avg: 0.8 median: 0.8 (25%) max: 0.869 GB/s
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 94% 96% 98% 100%
min: 0.96 avg: 1.1 median: 1.1 (32%) max: 1.1 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 74% 63% 64% 85% 66% 67% 85% 85% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.2 avg: 1.4 median: 1.4 (24%) max: 1.4 GB/s
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 100% 86% 100% 100%
min: 1.4 avg: 1.7 median: 1.8 (31%) max: 1.9 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 61% 61% 52% 83% 61% 61% 78% 78% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.8 avg: 8.9 median: 9 (23%) max: 9 GB/s
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 100% 99% 100% 98%
min: 7.9 avg: 10.5 median: 11.2 (29%) max: 11.6 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 65% 74% 74% 91% 74% 73% 93% 96% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 391 avg: 514 median: 479 (6%) max: 671 Seconds
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 100% 100% 102% 103% 104% 104%
min: 280 avg: 335.1 median: 305.5 (4%) max: 538 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 105% 102% 100% 100% 102% 104% 104% 104% 104% 105% 104% 104% 105% 105% 105% 105% 105% 105%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 228 avg: 285.3 median: 266.5 (2%) max: 364 Seconds
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 100% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101%
min: 163 avg: 190.5 median: 177 (1%) max: 285 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 101% 101% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4898 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (11%) max: 0.53 sec
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 101% 101% 100% 101% 100% 101%
min: 0.4313 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (10%) max: 0.503 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 104% 104% 103% 103% 102% 103% 102% 103% 103% 104% 100% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 103% 104%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12498 avg: 13652 median: 13866 (30%) max: 13971 Points
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 90% 100% 100% 99%
min: 9854 avg: 13246 median: 13162 (28%) max: 15529 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 85% 82% 91% 87% 91% 90% 75% 100% 82%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.4 avg: 7.5 median: 7.5 (2%) max: 7.744 s
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 6.6 avg: 6.8 median: 6.8 (1%) max: 7.256 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.446 avg: 16.6 median: 16.5 (1%) max: 16.967 s
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 14.879 avg: 15 median: 14.9 (1%) max: 15.15 s
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 394.697 avg: 406.3 median: 403.6 (2%) max: 423.565 s
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 304.446 avg: 358 median: 366.9 (2%) max: 402.742 s
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 101% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 43778 avg: 65927 median: 71115.5 (55%) max: 71915 Points
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 61% 92% 99% 100%
min: 74020 avg: 77177 median: 76132 (58%) max: 80494 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 94% 54% 82% 92% 88% 89% 100% 99% 91%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12766 avg: 16347 median: 17039 (43%) max: 17992 Points
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 77% 72% 95% 94% 98% 100%
min: 12693 avg: 21045 median: 21875 (55%) max: 24629 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 89% 52% 56% 52% 69% 72% 71% 80% 72% 91% 98% 100% 98% 84% 81% 90% 92%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 69572 avg: 72139 median: 72618 (59%) max: 73481 Points
CPU TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 99% 100% 98%
min: 74638 avg: 81122 median: 75478 (61%) max: 100241 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 80% 72% 74% 73% 71% 75% 100% 88%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 69751 avg: 71822 median: 72061.5 (58%) max: 73412 Points
CPU TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 100% 99%
min: 73618 avg: 80933 median: 75417 (61%) max: 100192 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 80% 74% 72% 71% 75% 100% 89%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
37732 Points (31%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 37732
min: 79411 avg: 83102 median: 84374 (70%) max: 85520 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 44% 93% 100%
min: 78677 avg: 88691 median: 90339.5 (75%) max: 102469 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 67% 89% 77% 83% 83% 100% 92%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8923 Points (23%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 8923
min: 14164 avg: 14885 median: 14961 (38%) max: 15261 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 59% 94% 99% 100% 99%
min: 16393 avg: 19079 median: 18881 (48%) max: 21267 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 77% 68% 76% 73% 86% 72% 95% 100% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16291 avg: 20865 median: 21667.5 (39%) max: 22978 Points
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 80% 73% 95% 99% 99% 100%
min: 21106 avg: 27722 median: 28264 (50%) max: 30623 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 95% 69% 58% 53% 70% 77% 72% 87% 73% 91% 82% 99% 96% 100% 95% 89% 95% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5039 Points (21%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 5039
min: 6216 avg: 8210 median: 8720 (37%) max: 9182 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 55% 68% 70% 96% 95% 100% 96%
min: 6307 avg: 10856 median: 11481 (48%) max: 12209 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 79% 52% 51% 52% 71% 76% 75% 86% 72% 97% 78% 99% 96% 100% 89% 82% 97% 94%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5778 Points (68%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 5778
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
1343 Points (34%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 1343
min: 2199 avg: 2277 median: 2288 (58%) max: 2316 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 58% 98% 100% 97% 99% 95% 100%
min: 2199 avg: 2489 median: 2503 (64%) max: 2573 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 76% 97% 89% 90% 88% 95% 85% 93% 90% 98% 77% 98% 100% 97% 97% 100% 85% 96%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
4370 Points (17%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 4370
min: 11087 avg: 11404 median: 11411.5 (45%) max: 11749 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 37% 95% 98% 98% 94% 96% 100%
min: 12825 avg: 13796 median: 13973 (55%) max: 14540 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 67% 94% 79% 82% 82% 91% 79% 99% 83% 95% 83% 100% 99% 100% 96% 100% 90% 98%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1006 Points (39%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 1006
min: 1593 avg: 1660 median: 1676 (65%) max: 1699 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 59% 99% 100% 96% 98% 94% 99%
min: 1700 avg: 1841 median: 1857 (73%) max: 1902 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 75% 95% 89% 89% 86% 94% 84% 92% 89% 98% 72% 98% 100% 98% 98% 98% 89% 92%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
3951 Points (7%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 3951
min: 9696 avg: 10408 median: 10542 (19%) max: 10856 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 36% 95% 89% 99% 92% 99% 100%
min: 10441 avg: 13268 median: 13444 (24%) max: 14230 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 64% 73% 72% 68% 76% 86% 76% 90% 76% 94% 81% 100% 98% 97% 95% 93% 90% 95%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1596 avg: 1628 median: 1627.5 (7%) max: 1659 Points
CPU TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 96% 100%
min: 1797 avg: 1812 median: 1810 (8%) max: 1830 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 98% 87% 91% 100% 100% 98% 93%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10676 avg: 10712 median: 10711.5 (34%) max: 10747 Points
CPU TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 99% 100%
min: 13228 avg: 13581 median: 13561.5 (43%) max: 13972 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 99% 76% 77% 95% 100% 95% 98%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6734 avg: 6816 median: 6750 (67%) max: 6964 Points
CPU TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 97% 97% 100%
min: 7328 avg: 7482 median: 7516 (75%) max: 7602 Points
CPU TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 89% 99% 89% 92% 100% 96% 93%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 38648 avg: 38726 median: 38736 (39%) max: 38793 Points
CPU TDP 40 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 100% 100% 100%
min: 47960 avg: 49207 median: 49737 (50%) max: 49924 Points
CPU TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 78% 100% 77% 78% 96% 100% 100%
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 12.95
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 12.8
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 836.4 avg: 10153 median: 14670 (17%) max: 14953 ms
min: 560 avg: 575 median: 571 (1%) max: 595 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 100% 113% 113% 113% 113% 113% 113%
min: 494 avg: 520 median: 518 (1%) max: 594 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 100% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109%
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
7004 ms (66%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 7004
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2672 avg: 13727 median: 2773.5 (2%) max: 46687 Points
min: 85765 avg: 86220 median: 86219.5 (72%) max: 86674 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W TDP 30 W 16% 100% 99%
min: 90543 avg: 95362 median: 96090 (80%) max: 98144 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 31% 92% 88% 87% 96% 100% 98%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
160 Points (45%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 Chrome 130.0.6723.10212 GB 160
min: 227 avg: 233.2 median: 231 (65%) max: 240 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 67% 100% 99% 96% 95% 96%
min: 237 avg: 260.9 median: 266.6 (75%) max: 271 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 80% 96% 89% 88% 94% 84% 100% 86% 97% 100% 100% 100% 94% 88% 92%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
200 Points (37%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 Chrome 130.0.6723.10212 GB 200
min: 245 avg: 254.7 median: 254 (47%) max: 263 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 76% 95% 100% 93% 100% 97% 97%
min: 237 avg: 280.5 median: 287 (53%) max: 301 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 82% 99% 85% 89% 83% 95% 86% 97% 86% 96% 99% 100% 99% 89% 80% 91%
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
714538 Points (43%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 714538
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
197906 Points (54%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 197906
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
0 Points (0%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB (!)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
13858 Points (58%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 13858
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1028 Points (39%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 1028
min: 1522 avg: 1574 median: 1548 (59%) max: 1633 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 63% 95% 100% 100% 94% 93%
min: 1589 avg: 1779 median: 1790 (69%) max: 1971 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 78% 93% 85% 89% 100% 84% 96% 83% 95% 100% 94% 99% 98% 87% 94%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41.3 avg: 64.4 median: 62.2 (11%) max: 90.6 Watt
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 110% 109% 107% 104% 102% 100%
min: 44.4 avg: 116.6 median: 125.2 (22%) max: 176.1 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 110% 133% 133% 132% 130% 126% 123% 121% 117% 112% 111% 106% 109% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 56.7 avg: 70.7 median: 64.3 (12%) max: 89.2 Watt
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 105% 107% 106% 102% 100%
min: 88 avg: 130.9 median: 134.3 (24%) max: 171.8 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 107% 129% 131% 123% 124% 122% 119% 100% 104% 101% 113% 105%
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
9.5 Watt (4%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 9.52
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.31 avg: 8 median: 6.4 (4%) max: 14.4 Watt
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 106% 107% 107% 102% 100% 106%
min: 5.1 avg: 12.3 median: 11.6 (8%) max: 21.4 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 100% 112% 112% 112% 113% 109% 105% 111% 110% 102% 111% 109% 102% 108%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.5 Watt (6%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 5.5
min: 5.71 avg: 6.7 median: 6.7 (7%) max: 7.68 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W 103% 101% 102% 100%
min: 5.18 avg: 13.3 median: 11.7 (13%) max: 28.8 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 40 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 134% 128% 136% 138% 134% 124% 138% 100% 124% 127% 128% 128%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 24 avg: 28 median: 28 (21%) max: 31.3 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W 85% 96% 100% 89% 77%
min: 17.8 avg: 28.2 median: 24.7 (18%) max: 67 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 28 W TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 54 W TDP 64 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W 31% 100% 40% 45% 45% 42% 36% 42% 27% 29% 27% 36%
Average Benchmarks unknown → 100% n=13 Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 125H → 594% n=13 Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 674% n=13
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 12. 21:03:41
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 16911 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731441820s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:16:49 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.005s
#9 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.126s ... 0.131s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16911 +0.005s ... 0.136s
#11 got single benchmarks 16911 +0.014s ... 0.15s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.005s ... 0.155s
#13 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.03s ... 0.185s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.185s
#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.02s ... 0.205s
#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.05s ... 0.256s
#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.266s
#18 return log +0s ... 0.266s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)