Notebookcheck Logo

unknown vs Google Tensor G4

unknown

Google Tensor G4

The Google Tensor G4 is the processor powering Pixel 9 series phones that debuted in August 2024. It certainly is well-connected, with both 5G and Wi-Fi 7 onboard. According to reports, the chip is built using one of Samsung's 4 nm processes making for decent power efficiency, as of late 2024.

The CPU part of the SoC is made up of 8 cores. The Cortex-X4 reportedly runs at 3.1 GHz and is the fastest of the bunch. Then there are also 3 Cortex-A720 cores (2.6 GHz) and 4 very frugal Cortex-A520 cores (1.95 GHz). This setup is only just enough for middling benchmark scores that are a far cry from what the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, not to mention the A18 Pro deliver.

The G715 MP7 reportedly serves as the graphics adapter.

show full text
ModelunknownGoogle Tensor G4
Series Google
Serie:
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown «  cores
Google Tensor G4 « 1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown cores
Architecturex86ARM
Clock1950 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 8
1 x ARM Cortex-X4
3 x ARM Cortex-A720
4 x ARM Cortex-A520
Technology4 nm
iGPUARM Mali-G715 MP7
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 unknown +
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
37732 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5637 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1950 Points (52%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
4741 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
423 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
2563 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6498 Points (65%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15112 Points (17%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 unknown +
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 unknown +
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
min: 14670     avg: 14812     median: 14811.5 (17%)     max: 14953 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
7004 ms (66%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 2740     median: 2753 (2%)     max: 2794 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
103 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
55.8 MB/s (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
250 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
25 MB/s (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1592 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
28089 Points (45%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
13948 Points (64%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 unknown +
1081 Points (41%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 unknown +
6.4 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 unknown +
0.6 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks unknown → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 18. 18:24:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18012 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1729268642s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 05:17:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0s ... 0.002s

#8 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.02s ... 0.022s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18012 +0.001s ... 0.023s

#10 got single benchmarks 18012 +0s ... 0.023s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.024s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.025s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.026s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.026s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.026s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.029s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.029s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.029s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.029s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.03s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.03s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.03s

#24 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.031s

#25 return log +0.003s ... 0.034s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)