Notebookcheck Logo

unknown vs Intel Celeron J4105

unknown

► remove from comparison

Intel Celeron J4105

Intel Celeron J4105

Der Intel Celeron J4105 ist ein Ende 2017 vorgestellter Quad-Core-SoC für Desktops, der hauptsächlich in preiswerten Mini-PCs verbaut wird. Er taktet mit 1,5 bis 2,5 GHz (Einzelkern Burst) und gehört der Gemini-Lake-Plattform an. Die Fertigung erfolgt wie beim Vorgänger Apollo Lake in einem 14-Nanometer-Prozesses mit FinFETs. Neben den vier CPU-Kernen integriert der Chip auch eine DirectX-12-fähige Grafikeinheit sowie einen DDR4/LPDDR4-Speichercontroller (Dual-Channel, 2.400 MHz). Der SoC kann nicht ausgetauscht werden, da er direkt mit dem Mainboard verlötet wird (BGA Package).

Architektur

Die Prozessor-Architektur der Gemini Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger leicht weiterentwickelt. Intel nennt sie nun Goldmont Plus Kerne und verdoppelt den Level 2 Cache von 2 auf 4 MB. Trotzdem sollte die Pro-MHz-Leistung noch deutlich hinter den aktuellen Kaby-Lake Prozessoren bleiben.

show full text
ModelunknownIntel Celeron J4105
Series Intel Gemini Lake
Serie: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Google Tensor G4 compare1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown «  cores
Intel Celeron J4105 « 1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Architecturex86x86
CodenameGemini Lake
Clock1500 - 2500 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
TDP10 Watt
Technology14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)
$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
270 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
73 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
37732 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5637 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1950 Points (52%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
4741 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
423 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
2563 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6498 Points (65%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15112 Points (17%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 unknown +
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 unknown +
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
min: 14670     avg: 14812     median: 14811.5 (17%)     max: 14953 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
7004 ms (66%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 2740     median: 2753 (2%)     max: 2794 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
103 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
55.8 MB/s (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
250 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
25 MB/s (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1592 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
28089 Points (45%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
13948 Points (64%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 unknown +
1081 Points (41%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 unknown +
6.4 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 unknown +
0.6 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks unknown → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4105 → 26% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 18. 22:28:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9928 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1729283322s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 05:17:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.031s

#8 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.13s ... 0.162s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9928 +0.001s ... 0.162s

#10 got single benchmarks 9928 +0.003s ... 0.165s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.165s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.168s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.17s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.17s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.17s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.171s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.173s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.174s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.174s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.174s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.175s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.175s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.176s

#24 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.177s

#25 return log +0.002s ... 0.179s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)