Notebookcheck Logo

newitem vs Samsung Exynos W930 vs unknown

newitem

► remove from comparison

Samsung Exynos W930

► remove from comparison Exynos W930

Der Samsung Exynos W930 ist ein SoC für Smartwatches welcher Mitte 2023 vorgestellt wurde. Er integriert zwei kleine ARM Cortex-A55 Kerne mit 1,4 GHz und eine ARM Mali-G68MP2 Grafikkarte. Das integrierte LTE Modem unterstützt Cat.4 Download (150 Mbps) bzw Cat.5 Upload (75 Mbps). Für die Satellitenortung unterstützt der Chip GPS, GLONASS, Beidou und Galileo. Samsung spezifzierte ein QHD 960x540 Display, 2GB LPDDR4 RAM und 16 GB eMMC als weitere Features des Packages. 

Der SoC wird im relativ modernen 5nm Prozess bei Samsung hergestellt.

unknown

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelnewitemSamsung Exynos W930unknown
Series
Serie:
newitem «  cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A61 GHz2 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Rockchip RK3566 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos W930 « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Samsung Exynos W9201.18 GHz2 / 2 cores ARM Cortex-A55
newitem cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A61 GHz2 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown «  cores
CodenameARM Cortex-A55
Clock1400 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 2
Technology5 nm
Features2x 1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A55, ARM Mali-G68MP2, qHD (960x540) Display Support, LTE Cat.4 150MBps (DL), Cat.5 75Mbps (UL), GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, eMMC 16GB
iGPUARM Mali-G68 MP2
Announced
Manufacturersemiconductor.samsung.com
Architecturex86

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 unknown +
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
37732 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 unknown +
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 unknown +
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 14711.3     avg: 15205     median: 15204.8 (18%)     max: 15698.2 ms
120%
1 unknown +
min: 779.1     avg: 5662     median: 1253.9 (1%)     max: 14953 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1444.1     avg: 1464     median: 1464.1 (16%)     max: 1484 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
7004 ms (66%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2575     avg: 2581     median: 2581 (2%)     max: 2587 Points
670%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 21642     median: 17303 (15%)     max: 49290 Points

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos W930 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks unknown → 0% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 02. 16:26:13

#0 checking url part for id 17594 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15094 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719930373 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.031s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17594 +0.001s ... 0.032s

#8 got single benchmarks 17594 +0s ... 0.032s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15094 +0.001s ... 0.033s

#10 got single benchmarks 15094 +0.004s ... 0.036s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.037s

#12 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.116s ... 0.153s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.153s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.159s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.159s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)