Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 vs Renesas MP5232 vs Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz

HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620

► remove from comparison

Coretex A9 Quad-Core - max 1.5 GHz, im Huawei Mediapad 10 FHD mit 1.2 GHz

Renesas MP5232

► remove from comparison  MP5232

Der Renesas MP5232 ist ein günstiger Dual-Core ARM SoC mit LTE Unterstützung. Er zielt hauptsächlich auf Einstiegs-LTE-Smartphones mit Android im Bereich von 150 - 300 Euro ab. Als Prozessorpart sind zwei ARM Cortex-A9 mit bis zu 1.5 GHz integriert. Im Samsung Galaxy Core LTE SM-G386F werden diese jedoch z.B. nur mit maximal 1.2 GHz betrieben. Weiters findet man eine PowerVR SGX544 Grafikkarte und die oben erwähnten LTE Cat. 4 und 3G (DC-HSPA+, Edge) Einheiten im SoC. Auch ein integrierter 1080p Video De- und Encoder, 20 MP ISP und Audio Subsystem sind im MP5232 verbaut.

Quellen: Test Samsung Galaxy Core LTE SM-G386F, Renesas

Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison

ModelHiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620Renesas MP5232Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz
Series
Serie:
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 « 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
Clock1200 MHz1500 MHz1200 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 21 / 1
Technology40 nm55 nm
FeaturesARMv7Vivante GC800, DDR1-3 memory controller, hardware video en- and decoder
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
CodenameCortex-A9
Manufacturerwww.renesas.com
iGPUVivante GC800

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 3209     avg: 4477     median: 4894 (4%)     max: 5167 Points
85%
1 MP5232 +
4163 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 5354     avg: 5357     median: 5357 (4%)     max: 5360 Points
77%
1 MP5232 +
4147 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1094 Points (2%)
60%
1 MP5232 +
654 Points (1%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
327 Points (6%)
114%
1 MP5232 +
373 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 439     avg: 489.9     median: 500 (4%)     max: 547 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 940     avg: 1187     median: 1218 (11%)     max: 1290 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1793     avg: 2360     median: 2351 (5%)     max: 2731 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1000     avg: 1317     median: 1275 (3%)     max: 1591 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1209     avg: 1573     median: 1557 (4%)     max: 1819 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 92.3     avg: 133.3     median: 138.1 (5%)     max: 151.8 MFLOPS
51%
1 MP5232 +
70.2 MFLOPS (2%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 37.8     avg: 44.2     median: 46.6 (5%)     max: 48.71 MFLOPS
11.7 MFLOPS (1%)
14.3 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
26477 ms (31%)
122%
1 MP5232 +
21760 ms (25%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 856     avg: 2197     median: 1610 (18%)     max: 4026 ms
106%
1 MP5232 +
1525 ms (17%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1522     avg: 1643     median: 1540 (15%)     max: 2080 ms
104%
1 MP5232 +
1480 ms (14%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 MP5232 +
1547 Points (1%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 4404     avg: 4736     median: 4736 (11%)     max: 5068 points
3959 points (9%)
1249 points (3%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 4820     avg: 5667     median: 5662 (37%)     max: 6713 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
14434 Points (34%)
85%
1 MP5232 +
12246 Points (28%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 92     avg: 191     median: 191 (6%)     max: 290 Iter./s
109%
1 MP5232 +
209 Iter./s (6%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 8740     avg: 8897     median: 8897 (29%)     max: 9054 Iter./s
48%
1 MP5232 +
4260 Iter./s (14%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 8223     avg: 8737     median: 8678 (1%)     max: 9118 Points
53%
1 MP5232 +
4557 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Renesas MP5232 → 54% n=2

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz → 28% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 16. 18:46:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3613 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5844 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 3317 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731779210s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3613 +0s ... 0.003s

#9 got single benchmarks 3613 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 5844 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#11 got single benchmarks 5844 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3317 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#13 got single benchmarks 3317 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.023s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.023s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)