HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 vs Intel Celeron N4100 vs unknown
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 ► remove from comparison
Coretex A9 Quad-Core - max 1.5 GHz, im Huawei Mediapad 10 FHD mit 1.2 GHz
Intel Celeron N4100 ► remove from comparison
Der I ntel Celeron N4100 ist ein Ende 2017 vorgestellter Quad-Core-SoC, der hauptsächlich in preiswerten Notebooks verbaut wird. Er taktet mit 1,1 bis 2,4 GHz (Einzelkern Burst, Mehrkern Burst max. 2,3 GHz) und gehört der Gemini-Lake-Plattform an. Die Fertigung erfolgt wie beim Vorgänger Apollo Lake in einem 14-Nanometer-Prozesses mit FinFETs. Neben den vier CPU-Kernen integriert der Chip auch eine DirectX-12-fähige Grafikeinheit sowie einen DDR4/LPDDR4-Speichercontroller (Dual-Channel, 2.400 MHz). Der SoC kann nicht ausgetauscht werden, da er direkt mit dem Mainboard verlötet wird (BGA Package).
Im Vergleich zum Celeron N3450 , bietet der N4100 leicht verbesserte CPU Kerne mit 200 MHz höherem Boost Takt, verdoppeltem L2 Cache, ein kleineres Package, neuere Displayanschlüsse und ein teilweise integriertes WLAN Modul (Wireless-AC9560 mit Companion Module).
Architektur
Die Prozessor-Architektur der Gemini Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger leicht weiterentwickelt. Intel nennt sie nun Goldmont Plus Kerne und verdoppelt den Level 2 Cache von 2 auf 4 MB. Trotzdem sollte die Pro-MHz-Leistung noch deutlich hinter den aktuellen Kaby-Lake Prozessoren bleiben.
Performance
Die CPU-Leistung des Celeron N4100 mit 4 CPU-Kernen und einer Taktrate von 1,1 bis 2,4 GHz dürfte stark vom Kühlsystem abhängen. Wenn der Boost Takt gehalten werden kann, sollte der N4100 einige Prozent schneller rechnen als der Vorgänger Celeron N3450 und knapp an das Niveau des alten Pentium N4200 (1,1 - 2,5 GHz, 2MB L2, Apollo Lake) . Der Core m3-7Y30 bietet eine deutlich höhere Einzelkernperformance und kann auch im Mehrkernbetrieb (trotz seiner 2 Kerne) überzeugen. Der N4100 bewältigt jedoch problemlos die meisten Alltagsanwendungen (Office, Browsing) und ist auch für moderates Multitasking geeignet.
Grafik
Die integrierte UHD Graphics 600 unterscheidet sich nur durch die verbesserten Displayanschlüsse von der HD Graphics 500.
Weiterhin integriert der Chip eine fortschrittliche Videoeinheit, die auch die hardwarebeschleunigte Wiedergabe von VP9- und H.265-Material (8 Bit Farbtiefe) beherrscht.
Leistungsaufnahme
Der gesamte SoC wird von Intel wie der Vorgänger mit einer TDP von 6 Watt spezifiziert (SDP 4,8 Watt - Scenario Design Power). Damit kann der Chip prinzipiell rein passiv gekühlt werden, jedoch sind auch Varianten mit Lüfter möglich.
Model HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 Intel Celeron N4100 unknown Series Intel Gemini Lake Serie: Clock 1200 MHz 1100 - 2400 MHz Cores / Threads 4 / 4 4 / 4 Technology 40 nm 14 nm Features ARMv7 DDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX Architecture ARM x86 x86 Announced Codename Gemini Lake L2 Cache 4 MB TDP 6 Watt max. Temp. 105 °C Socket BGA1090 iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 700 MHz)$107 U.S. Manufacturer ark.intel.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4100
15.8 pt (26%)
max:
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 955 avg: 961 median: 960.5 (1%) max: 966 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 382 avg: 386.5 median: 386.5 (16%) max: 391 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 151 avg: 152.6 median: 152 (17%) max: 155 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 368 avg: 440 median: 391 (1%) max: 560 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 161 avg: 205.7 median: 198 (1%) max: 254 Points
min: 1029 avg: 1038 median: 1038 (7%) max: 1047 Points
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown Win10 1029 Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown macOS 1047
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 62 avg: 68.1 median: 68.6 (20%) max: 71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.13 avg: 2.4 median: 2.2 (3%) max: 2.9 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.8 avg: 0.8 median: 0.8 (20%) max: 0.83 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1664 avg: 1951 median: 2013 (12%) max: 2049 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4915 avg: 5999 median: 5904 (4%) max: 7123 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
10929 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3337 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 591 avg: 724 median: 790 (9%) max: 790 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 18.97 avg: 20.3 median: 19.4 (4%) max: 22.5 s
min: 1093 avg: 1148 median: 1139 (2%) max: 1212 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 5620 avg: 6674 median: 6608 (4%) max: 7835 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2125 avg: 2209 median: 2158 (26%) max: 2459 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 11.8 avg: 13.3 median: 11.8 (4%) max: 16.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 57.7 avg: 64.5 median: 58.2 (13%) max: 77.7 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 0.974 avg: 1.2 median: 1.2 (2%) max: 1.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.156 avg: 0.2 median: 0.2 (5%) max: 0.162 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.222 avg: 0.2 median: 0.2 (4%) max: 0.236 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.7 GB/s (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2437 avg: 3032 median: 3176 (22%) max: 3527 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.75 avg: 1.8 median: 1.8 (38%) max: 1.786 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2748 avg: 2985 median: 2805 (6%) max: 3580 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27.42 avg: 28.3 median: 28.5 (6%) max: 28.94 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61.9 avg: 63.1 median: 62.6 (3%) max: 64.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1381 avg: 1462 median: 1474 (7%) max: 1532 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2009 avg: 2338 median: 2213 (6%) max: 2919 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 3209 avg: 4477 median: 4894 (4%) max: 5167 Points
min: 12964 avg: 20919 median: 19160 (16%) max: 31380 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 5354 avg: 5357 median: 5357 (4%) max: 5360 Points
min: 12613 avg: 20195 median: 19086 (15%) max: 29271 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 19890 avg: 24471 median: 23934 (20%) max: 32203 Points
37732 Points (32%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 37732
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1591 avg: 1967 median: 1818 (5%) max: 2555 Points
8923 Points (23%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 8923
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2146 avg: 2954 median: 2910 (5%) max: 3799 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 611 avg: 711 median: 706 (3%) max: 841 Points
5039 Points (21%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 5039
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5637 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1950 Points (52%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
4741 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 378 avg: 403.3 median: 405 (16%) max: 414 Points
423 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1082 avg: 1267 median: 1271 (2%) max: 1419 Points
2563 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 377 avg: 400.5 median: 408 (2%) max: 409 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1078 avg: 1238 median: 1232 (4%) max: 1409 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1731 avg: 1779 median: 1795 (18%) max: 1799 Points
6498 Points (65%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4713 avg: 5188 median: 5259 (6%) max: 5404 Points
15112 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1813 avg: 1825 median: 1825 (25%) max: 1837 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5056 avg: 5123 median: 5122.5 (12%) max: 5189 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1094 Points (2%)
min: 4998 avg: 5042 median: 5041.5 (9%) max: 5085 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
327 Points (6%)
min: 1623 avg: 1629 median: 1629 (32%) max: 1635 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5490 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1762 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 439 avg: 489.9 median: 500 (4%) max: 547 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 940 avg: 1187 median: 1218 (11%) max: 1290 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1793 avg: 2360 median: 2351 (5%) max: 2731 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1000 avg: 1317 median: 1275 (3%) max: 1591 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1209 avg: 1573 median: 1557 (4%) max: 1819 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 92.3 avg: 133.3 median: 138.1 (5%) max: 151.8 MFLOPS
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 12.95
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 37.8 avg: 44.2 median: 46.6 (5%) max: 48.71 MFLOPS
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 12.8
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
26477 ms (31%)
min: 2561 avg: 3127 median: 3214 (4%) max: 3865 ms
min: 14670 avg: 14812 median: 14811.5 (17%) max: 14953 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 856 avg: 2197 median: 1610 (18%) max: 4026 ms
233 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1522 avg: 1643 median: 1540 (15%) max: 2080 ms
7004 ms (66%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 7004
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 10309 avg: 11163 median: 11328 (10%) max: 11852 Points
min: 2672 avg: 2740 median: 2753 (2%) max: 2794 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
103 Points (30%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Google Pixel 9 unknown Mali-G715 MP7 Chrome 12912 GB 103
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 71.4 avg: 77 median: 75.2 (16%) max: 84 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 4404 avg: 4736 median: 4736 (11%) max: 5068 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 4820 avg: 5667 median: 5662 (37%) max: 6713 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
14434 Points (34%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 92 avg: 191 median: 191 (6%) max: 290 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 8740 avg: 8897 median: 8897 (29%) max: 9054 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 8223 avg: 8737 median: 8678 (1%) max: 9118 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
7616 Points (50%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
55.8 MB/s (41%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Google Pixel 9 unknown Mali-G715 MP7 3.0.406112 GB 55.8
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
250 MB/s (7%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Google Pixel 9 unknown Mali-G715 MP7 3.0.406112 GB 250
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
25 MB/s (31%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Google Pixel 9 unknown Mali-G715 MP7 3.0.406112 GB 25
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1592 MB/s (44%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Google Pixel 9 unknown Mali-G715 MP7 3.0.406112 GB 1592
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
28089 Points (45%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Google Pixel 9 unknown Mali-G715 MP7 3.0.406112 GB 28089
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
13948 Points (64%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1081 Points (41%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 6.4 avg: 11.3 median: 11.3 (2%) max: 16.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
6.7 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
6.4 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
0.6 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
24 Points per Watt (18%)
Average Benchmarks HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 → 100% n=1 Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4100 → 824% n=1 Average Benchmarks unknown → 179% n=1
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 18. 20:14:25
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 3613 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9424 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1729275265s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 05:17:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3613 +0.001s ... 0.004s
#9 got single benchmarks 3613 +0.006s ... 0.011s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9424 +0.004s ... 0.015s
#11 got single benchmarks 9424 +0.013s ... 0.027s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.028s
#13 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.124s ... 0.152s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.152s
#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.022s ... 0.174s
#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.175s
#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.176s
#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.178s
#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.179s
#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.015s ... 0.194s
#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.199s
#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.199s
#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.2s
#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.2s
#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.201s
#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.201s
#27 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.204s
#28 return log +0s ... 0.204s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)