Intel Core i9-13950HX vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Intel Core i5-13500HX
Intel Core i9-13950HX ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-13950HX ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Raptor-Lake-Architektur für große und schwere Notebooks. Die CPU wurde Anfang 2023 vorgestellt und ist ähnlich zum Desktop Core i9-13900K , jedoch mit niedrigeren Taktraten. Im Unterschied zum ähnlichen Core i9-13980HX , bietet der 13950HX vollen vPro Support aber 100 MHz weniger Boost-Takt der P-Kerne.
Die insgesamt 32 Threads unterteilen sich in P-Cores und E-Cores, die wir bereits von Alder-Lake her kennen. Dabei kommen nach wie vor 8 Performance-Kerne (P-Cores) mit Hyperthreading zum Einsatz. Die Anzahl der energieeffizienten E-Cores hat sich indes auf 16 erhöht, sodass in Summe 32 Threads gleichzeitig verarbeitet werden können. Die P-Cores takten von 2,2 bis 5,5 GHz (4,9 GHz All-Core) und die E-Cores von 1,6 bis 4 GHz. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5 mit 5600 MHz.
Die neue Raptor Lake Architektur bietet im Vergleich zu Alder Lake verbesserte P-Cores (Raptor Cove Architektur mit mehr Cache), mehr E-Cores (selbe Gracemont Architektur) und höhere Taktraten dank des verbesserten Intel 7 Prozesses. Weiters unterstützt Intel bei den Topmodellen nun schnelleren DDR5 Hauptspeicher (bis 5600 MHz).
Performance
Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-12900HX bietet der Core i9-13950HX weiterhin 8 Kerne, welche aber durch 16 weitere E-Cores bei anspruchsvollen Anwendungen entlastet werden und somit für eine sehr hohe Multi-Thread-Performance sorgen. Die E-Cores kümmern sich in erster Linie um Hintergrundanwendungen. Die hybride Architektur vertraut dabei auf den Intel Thread Direktor, der für die richtige Zuteilung der Aufgaben zuständig ist. Im Vergleich zu Alder-Lake konnte die IPC deutlich gesteigert werden. Zusammen mit dem deutlich höheren Boost profitiert die CPU in allen Belangen von einer deutlich spürbaren Leistungssteigerung.
Der 13950HX wird im weiter verbesserten 10nm FinFET Verfahren bei Intel gefertigt (Intel 7 Prozess) und ist spezifiziert mit 55 Watt Base Power und 157 Watt Turbo Power.
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS ► remove from comparison
Der AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS ist ein Mobilprozessor für große Notebooks (z.B. Gaming Laptops) basierend auf die Rembrandt Generation. Der SoC beinhaltet acht Zen 3+ Kerne (Octa-Core CPU) welche mit 3,2 GHz (garantierter Basistakt) bis zu 4,7 GHz getaktet werden (Turbo) und SMT / Hyperthreading (16 Threads) unterstützen. Der Chip wird im modernen 6nm Prozess bei TSMC gefertigt und wurde Anfang 2022 vorgestellt. Als HS-Variante ist der TDP um 10W reduziert und dadurch eignet sich die CPU für dünnere Notebooks.
Die neuen Rembrandt APUs bieten einige Neuerungen, wie Support für USB4 mit 40 Gbps, PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s bzw LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2 und AV1 Decode in Hardware.
Die CPU Leistung ist pro Takt vergleichbar mit den alten Ryzen 5000 APUs, dank des neuen 6nm Prozess sind die CPUs aber höher getaktet und dadurch etwas schneller. Der 6800HS sollte daher zwischen Ryzen 9 5980HS und Ryzen 9 5900HS sich einordnen. Die neuen Alder Lake H-Serie CPUs sollten jedoch eine höhere Leistung bieten (z.b. i7-12800H ). Im Vergleich zum ähnlichen R7 6800H (45W, Übertaktung möglich), ist die Leistung bei längeren Lasten durch den verringerten TDP beim 6800HS limitiert.
Eine besondere Neuheit ist die aktualisierte Grafikkarte namens Radeon 680M , die nun endlich auf die aktuelle RDNA2-Architektur basiert und im 6800HS 12 CUs mit bis zu 2,2 GHz Takt bietet.
Der TDP ist mit 35 Watt spezifiziert, wodurch sich die CPU auch für dünnere Notebooks eignet.
Intel Core i5-13500HX ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i5-13500HX ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Raptor-Lake-Architektur für große und schwere Notebooks.
Die insgesamt 20 Threads unterteilen sich in P-Cores und E-Cores, die wir bereits von Alder-Lake her kennen. Der 13650HX bietet 6 Performance-Kerne (P-Cores) mit Hyperthreading und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Cores) ohne Hyperthreading. Die P-Cores takten von 2,5 (Base) - 4,7 GHz (Single-Core-Boost) bzw 4,5 GHz (alle Kerne). Die E-Cores takten von 1,8 GHz - 3,5 GHz.
Die neue Raptor Lake Architektur bietet im Vergleich zu Alder Lake verbesserte P-Cores (Raptor Cove Architektur mit mehr Cache), mehr E-Cores (selbe Gracemont Architektur) und höhere Taktraten dank des verbesserten Intel 7 Prozesses. Weiters unterstützt Intel bei den Topmodellen nun schnelleren DDR5 Hauptspeicher (bis 5600 MHz bei den i9, jedoch nur 4800 MHz beim 13500HX).
Die Performance sollte knapp unterhalb des Intel Core i5-12650HX liegen (14 Kerne, Alder Lake, bis 4,8 GHz).
Der 13500HX wird im weiter verbesserten 10nm FinFET Verfahren bei Intel gefertigt (Intel 7 Prozess) und ist spezifiziert mit 55 Watt Base Power und 157 Watt Turbo Power.
Model Intel Core i9-13950HX AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS Intel Core i5-13500HX Series Intel Raptor Lake-HX AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+) Intel Raptor Lake-HX Codename Raptor Lake-HX Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) Raptor Lake-HX Serie: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX Clock 1600 - 5500 MHz 3200 - 4700 MHz 1800 - 4700 MHz L2 Cache 32 MB 4 MB L3 Cache 36 MB 16 MB 24 MB Cores / Threads 24 / 32 8 x 5.5 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core 16 x 4.0 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core 8 / 16 14 / 20 TDP 55 Watt 35 Watt 55 Watt Technology 10 nm 6 nm 10 nm Die Size 257 mm2 257 mm2 max. Temp. 100 °C 95 °C 100 °C Socket BGA1964 FP7/FP7r2 BGA1964 Features DDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TME DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME DDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1650 MHz)AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1500 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com www.amd.com ark.intel.com L1 Cache 512 KB
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13950HX
45.6 pt (75%)
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 6800HS
35.4 pt (58%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500HX
39 pt (64%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
98 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
887 Points (17%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 24560 avg: 29352 median: 28681 (27%) max: 33277 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 74% 80% 85% 86% 94% 98% 100%
11992 Points (11%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 74% 36% 80% 85% 86% 94% 98% 100%
min: 18235 avg: 18582 median: 18334 (17%) max: 19176 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 55% 74% 58% 36% 80% 85% 86% 55% 94% 98% 100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1952 avg: 2067 median: 2096 (89%) max: 2113 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 96% 92% 98% 99% 100% 99%
1455 Points (62%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 69% 96% 92% 98% 99% 100% 99%
min: 1689 avg: 1731 median: 1730.5 (74%) max: 1772 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 84% 69% 96% 92% 98% 80% 99% 100% 99%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 742 avg: 788 median: 801 (89%) max: 816 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 91% 92% 98% 98% 98% 98%
570 Points (63%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 70% 91% 92% 98% 98% 98% 98%
min: 648 avg: 674 median: 679 (75%) max: 695 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 85% 100% 83% 70% 91% 92% 98% 79% 98% 98% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 8697 avg: 10973 median: 10919 (27%) max: 12648 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 74% 69% 85% 86% 94% 99% 100%
4634 Points (11%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 74% 37% 69% 85% 86% 94% 99% 100%
min: 6978 avg: 7123 median: 7021 (17%) max: 7371 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 55% 74% 58% 37% 69% 85% 86% 56% 94% 99% 100%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3625 avg: 4565 median: 4529 (29%) max: 5227 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 69% 87% 83% 86% 89% 98% 100%
1987 Points (13%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 69% 38% 87% 83% 86% 89% 98% 100%
min: 2856 avg: 2894 median: 2863 (18%) max: 2964 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 55% 69% 57% 38% 87% 83% 86% 55% 89% 98% 100%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 274 avg: 292.9 median: 297 (86%) max: 303 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 99% 90% 92% 98% 98% 100% 99%
234 Points (68%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 99% 77% 90% 92% 98% 98% 100% 99%
min: 242 avg: 252.3 median: 252 (73%) max: 263 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 87% 99% 83% 77% 90% 92% 98% 80% 98% 100% 99%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
60 Points (78%)
26.2 Points (34%)
CPU TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 44% 100%
33.7 Points (44%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 56% 44% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (88%)
2.8 Points (69%)
CPU TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 78% 100%
3.1 Points (77%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 88% 78% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11424 Points (69%)
6258 Points (38%)
CPU TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 55% 100%
8980 Points (54%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 79% 55% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
80693 Points (58%)
41339 Points (30%)
CPU TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 51% 100%
58608 Points (42%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 73% 51% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
75070 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
11833 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
400.2 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.7 s (2%)
6716 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 99351 avg: 115415 median: 116665 (67%) max: 127295 MIPS
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 78% 86% 86% 92% 94% 100% 100%
56170 MIPS (32%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 78% 44% 86% 86% 92% 94% 100% 100%
min: 68923 avg: 71289 median: 71243 (41%) max: 73701 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 58% 78% 54% 44% 86% 86% 92% 56% 94% 100% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6445 avg: 6775 median: 6754 (81%) max: 7064 MIPS
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 94% 91% 95% 97% 96% 100% 98%
5495 MIPS (66%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 94% 78% 91% 95% 97% 96% 100% 98%
min: 5377 avg: 5652 median: 5728 (68%) max: 5850 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 83% 94% 81% 78% 91% 95% 97% 76% 96% 100% 98%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
113.7 fps (40%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
254.7 fps (59%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 26 avg: 30.7 median: 31 (54%) max: 34.5 fps
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 75% 83% 88% 90% 92% 100% 95%
15.1 fps (27%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 75% 44% 83% 88% 90% 92% 100% 95%
min: 20.3 avg: 20.5 median: 20.3 (36%) max: 20.9 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 61% 75% 59% 44% 83% 88% 90% 59% 92% 100% 95%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (33%)
1.5 GB/s (45%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 100 W 100% 73%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
2.8 GB/s (48%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 100 W 100% 61%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.4 GB/s (30%)
14.6 GB/s (38%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 100 W 100% 78%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 175 avg: 203.1 median: 196 (2%) max: 254 Seconds
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 101% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101%
min: 310 avg: 328.3 median: 336 (4%) max: 339 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 101% 100% 102% 102% 102% 100% 102% 102% 102%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 100 avg: 112.4 median: 111 (1%) max: 137 Seconds
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
258 Seconds (2%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 101% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
min: 178 avg: 188 median: 193 (1%) max: 193 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 101% 101% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101% 100% 101% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3823 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.4121 sec
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 101% 100% 100% 100% 100% 101% 100%
0.5 sec (11%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 103% 100% 102% 103% 103% 103% 103% 103%
min: 0.4512 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (10%) max: 0.4891 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 101% 103% 101% 100% 102% 103% 103% 101% 103% 103% 103%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
19311 Points (41%)
13890 Points (30%)
CPU TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 72% 100%
min: 13265 avg: 14596 median: 14596 (31%) max: 15927 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 100 W TDP 130 W TDP 150 W 82% 72% 69% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.2 s (1%)
8.4 s (2%)
CPU TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 100% 100%
7.7 s (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.1 s (1%)
17.1 s (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 100 W 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
322.8 s (1%)
711 s (3%)
CPU TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 100% 102%
408 s (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 101% 100% 102%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
79200 Points (69%)
68865 Points (60%)
CPU TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 87% 100%
78386 Points (69%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 100 W TDP 150 W 99% 87% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19337 avg: 23708 median: 23960 (65%) max: 27078 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 71% 80% 81% 78% 96% 96% 98% 100%
18829 Points (51%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 71% 80% 70% 81% 78% 96% 96% 98% 100%
min: 22848 avg: 23667 median: 23435 (63%) max: 24719 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 81% 80% 87% 70% 81% 78% 96% 84% 96% 98% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
81602 Points (66%)
74164 Points (60%)
CPU TDP 100 W TDP 110 W 91% 100%
101155 Points (82%)
CPU TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W 73% 81% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77857 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
81621 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
16332 Points (41%)
18745 Points (47%)
CPU TDP 100 W TDP 110 W 100% 87%
min: 20276 avg: 20751 median: 20750.5 (52%) max: 21225 Points
CPU TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W 100% 88% 77% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 31279 avg: 37843 median: 39372 (70%) max: 42199 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 82% 83% 74% 93% 98% 98% 100%
25588 Points (46%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 82% 61% 83% 74% 93% 98% 98% 100%
min: 28766 avg: 30450 median: 30600 (55%) max: 31983 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 73% 82% 76% 61% 83% 74% 93% 68% 98% 98% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13744 avg: 15379 median: 14805 (62%) max: 18867 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 78% 74% 73% 78% 100% 85% 82%
10146 Points (43%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 78% 54% 74% 73% 78% 100% 85% 82%
min: 12867 avg: 13931 median: 14159 (60%) max: 14766 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 75% 78% 78% 54% 74% 73% 78% 68% 100% 85% 82%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2890 avg: 2920 median: 2919.5 (79%) max: 2949 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 134 W 100% 98%
2478 Points (67%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 134 W 100% 84% 98%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 15878 avg: 16928 median: 16927.5 (67%) max: 17977 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 134 W 88% 100%
13404 Points (53%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 134 W 88% 75% 100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1805 avg: 2013 median: 2043 (81%) max: 2097 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 86% 93% 97% 98% 100% 97%
1492 Points (59%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 71% 86% 93% 97% 98% 100% 97%
min: 1688 avg: 1732 median: 1730 (69%) max: 1779 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 85% 100% 82% 71% 86% 93% 97% 80% 98% 100% 97%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16776 avg: 19501 median: 20036 (36%) max: 21853 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 80% 83% 77% 92% 99% 100% 94%
9298 Points (17%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 80% 43% 83% 77% 92% 99% 100% 94%
min: 12683 avg: 13344 median: 13581 (24%) max: 13767 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 63% 80% 62% 43% 83% 77% 92% 58% 99% 100% 94%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1856 avg: 1979 median: 2006 (9%) max: 2048 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 114 W TDP 145 W 99% 91% 97% 100%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16846 avg: 18847 median: 18486.5 (58%) max: 21567 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 114 W TDP 145 W 78% 80% 91% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6168 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
36693 Points (40%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 451 avg: 466.6 median: 468 (1%) max: 478 ms
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
618 ms (1%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 521 avg: 539 median: 547 (1%) max: 550 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
103911 Points (91%)
90065 Points (79%)
CPU TDP 80 W TDP 150 W 87% 100%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 279 avg: 290.9 median: 291 (84%) max: 302 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 92% 94% 100% 98% 96% 99%
min: 240 avg: 246.7 median: 243 (70%) max: 257 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 85% 100% 79% 92% 94% 100% 80% 98% 96% 99%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 266 avg: 306.3 median: 318.5 (66%) max: 346 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 98% 78% 77% 100% 95% 91% 93%
280 Points (58%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 98% 81% 78% 77% 100% 95% 91% 93%
min: 255 avg: 280.7 median: 293 (61%) max: 294 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 85% 98% 85% 81% 78% 77% 100% 74% 95% 91% 93%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1592 avg: 1950 median: 1964 (75%) max: 2139 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 89% 74% 94% 99% 92% 89% 100%
min: 1701 avg: 1833 median: 1832.5 (70%) max: 1964 Points
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 89% 92% 74% 94% 99% 80% 92% 89% 100%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 134.5 avg: 188.3 median: 205 (35%) max: 223 Watt
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 123% 111% 125% 105% 102% 100% 101%
78.9 Watt (14%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 123% 140% 111% 125% 105% 102% 100% 101%
min: 128.6 avg: 132 median: 132 (23%) max: 135.4 Watt
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 123% 126% 140% 111% 125% 105% 125% 102% 100% 101%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 145 avg: 212.8 median: 204 (37%) max: 259 Watt
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 139% 123% 121% 119% 104% 104% 100%
83.6 Watt (15%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 139% 161% 123% 121% 119% 104% 104% 100%
179.2 Watt (33%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 139% 161% 123% 121% 119% 128% 104% 104% 100%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 14.2 avg: 20 median: 15.5 (10%) max: 35 Watt
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W 117% 118% 100% 109% 117% 117%
min: 16 avg: 17.4 median: 17.4 (12%) max: 18.8 Watt
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 109 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 130 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W 117% 116% 118% 100% 109% 114% 117% 117%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15 avg: 18.5 median: 17 (19%) max: 27.1 Watt
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 109 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W 119% 118% 100% 114% 116%
18.1 Watt (20%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W 119% 114% 118% 100% 114% 116%
13.4 Watt (15%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 80 W TDP 100 W TDP 109 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W 119% 122% 114% 118% 100% 114% 116%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 18.8 avg: 21.5 median: 21.4 (16%) max: 25 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 88% 88% 75% 83% 81%
23.8 Points per Watt (18%)
CPU TDP 48 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 114 W TDP 134 W TDP 145 W TDP 150 W 100% 95% 88% 88% 75% 83% 81%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13950HX → 100% n=28 Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS → 66% n=28 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500HX → 81% n=28
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 05. 18:30:48
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 14671 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 14120 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 14667 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728145848s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Oct 2024 05:16:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14671 +0.002s ... 0.006s
#9 got single benchmarks 14671 +0.002s ... 0.008s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14120 +0.004s ... 0.012s
#11 got single benchmarks 14120 +0.007s ... 0.018s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14667 +0.004s ... 0.022s
#13 got single benchmarks 14667 +0.008s ... 0.03s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.056s ... 0.086s
#16 return log +0s ... 0.086s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)