Intel Core i9-13900HX vs Intel Core i7-4790T
Intel Core i9-13900HX ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-13900HX ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Raptor-Lake-Architektur für große und schwere Notebooks. Die CPU wurde Anfang 2023 vorgestellt und ist anscheinend ähnlich zur Desktop Core i9-13900K , jedoch mit niedrigeren Taktraten.
Die insgesamt 32 Threads unterteilen sich in P-Cores und E-Cores, die wir bereits von Alder-Lake her kennen. Dabei kommen nach wie vor 8 Performance-Kerne (P-Cores) mit Hyperthreading zum Einsatz. Die Anzahl der energieeffizienten E-Cores hat sich indes auf 16 erhöht, sodass in Summe 32 Threads gleichzeitig verarbeitet werden können. Die P-Kerne takten von 2,2 GHz (Basistakt) bis 5,4 GHz (Einzelkern-Turbo) und die E-Kerne von 1,6 GHz bis 3,9 GHz.
Die neue Raptor Lake Architektur bietet im Vergleich zu Alder Lake verbesserte P-Cores (Raptor Cove Architektur mit mehr Cache), mehr E-Cores (selbe Gracemont Architektur) und höhere Taktraten dank des verbesserten Intel 7 Prozesses. Weiters unterstützt Intel bei den Topmodellen nun schnelleren DDR5 Hauptspeicher (bis 5600 MHz).
Performance
Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-12900HX bietet der Core i9-13900HX weiterhin 8 Kerne, welche aber durch 16 weitere E-Cores bei anspruchsvollen Anwendungen entlastet werden und somit für eine sehr hohe Multi-Thread-Performance sorgen. Die E-Cores kümmern sich in erster Linie um Hintergrundanwendungen. Die hybride Architektur vertraut dabei auf den Intel Thread Direktor, der für die richtige Zuteilung der Aufgaben zuständig ist. Im Vergleich zu Alder-Lake konnte die IPC deutlich gesteigert werden. Zusammen mit dem deutlich höheren Boost profitiert die CPU in allen Belangen von einer deutlich spürbaren Leistungssteigerung.
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Intel Core i9-12900HX bietet der Intel Core i9-13900HX eine integrierte Grafikeinheit. Als Basis dient weiterhin die Intel Iris XE-Architektur. Rein leistungstechnisch hat sich bei der neuen Intel UHD Graphics 770 aber nicht viel verändert.
Der 13900HX wird im weiter verbesserten 10nm FinFET Verfahren bei Intel gefertigt (Intel 7 Prozess) und ist spezifiziert mit 55 Watt Base Power und 157 Watt Turbo Power.
Intel Core i7-4790T ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i7- 4790T ist ein Desktop-Prozessor auf Basis der Haswell-Architektur, der im zweiten Quartal 2014 vorgestellt wurde. Er integriert vier Kerne (8 Threads) mit einer Taktrate von 2,7 - 3,9 GHz.
Architektur
Haswell ist der Nachfolger der 2012 vorgestellten Ivy-Bridge-Architektur und soll vor allem mit höherer Performance und verbesserter Energieeffizienz punkten. So wurde sowohl die Sprungvorhersage optimiert als auch die Zahl der Ausführungseinheiten erhöht, was insbesondere bei Verwendung von Hyper-Threading deutliche Leistungszuwächse verspricht. Neue Befehlssatzerweiterungen wie AVX2 und FMA sollen die Performance in darauf ausgelegten Anwendungen zusätzlich verbessern.
Model Intel Core i9-13900HX Intel Core i7-4790T Series Intel Raptor Lake-HX Intel Core i7 (Desktop) Codename Raptor Lake-HX Haswell Serie: Core i7 (Desktop) Haswell Clock 1600 - 5400 MHz 2700 - 3900 MHz L2 Cache 32 MB 1 MB L3 Cache 36 MB 8 MB Cores / Threads 24 / 32 8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core 16 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core 4 / 8 TDP 55 Watt 45 Watt Technology 10 nm 22 nm Die Size 257 mm2 177 mm2 max. Temp. 100 °C Socket BGA1964 FCLGA1150 Features DDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA HD Graphics 4600 (350 - 1200 MHz), DDR3-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro iGPU Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1650 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 4600 (350 - 1200 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com L1 Cache 256 KB Transistors 1400 Million $303 U.S.
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900HX
53.1 pt (74%)
...
max:
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 24270 avg: 28225 median: 27844 (26%) max: 32623 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 85% 87% 82% 100% 84% 86% 94% 75% 81% 85% 93%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1867 avg: 2044 median: 2055 (87%) max: 2105 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 98% 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 97% 89% 95% 97% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 722 avg: 784 median: 785.5 (87%) max: 810 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 95% 100% 100% 99% 99% 96% 97% 89% 95% 96% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9152 avg: 10766 median: 10548 (26%) max: 12541 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 89% 87% 82% 100% 82% 83% 92% 74% 79% 84% 92%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3913 avg: 4522 median: 4487 (28%) max: 4970 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 98% 89% 86% 100% 87% 86% 96% 79% 87% 89% 96%
674 Points (4%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 70% 89% 86% 100% 87% 86% 96% 79% 87% 89% 96%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 247 avg: 291.7 median: 295 (89%) max: 304 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 98% 99% 100% 99% 99% 97% 98% 82% 93% 99% 97%
152 Points (46%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 82% 99% 100% 99% 99% 97% 98% 82% 93% 99% 97%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 49.5 avg: 52.3 median: 52.3 (68%) max: 55.14 Points
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 90% 100%
7.2 Points (9%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 13% 90% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.64 avg: 3.7 median: 3.7 (91%) max: 3.67 Points
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 100% 99%
1.7 Points (43%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 47% 100% 99%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11618 avg: 11700 median: 11699.5 (71%) max: 11781 Points
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 100% 99%
5691 Points (34%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 48% 100% 99%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 76718 avg: 79300 median: 79299.5 (57%) max: 81881 Points
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 94% 100%
19774 Points (14%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 24% 94% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
111582 Points (77%)
26097 Points (18%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W 23% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17169 Points (21%)
7632 Points (9%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W 44% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
215.7 s (3%)
229.9 s (3%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W 100% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.6 s (1%)
7.4 s (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W 100% 101%
min: 12876 avg: 12916 median: 12916 (20%) max: 12956 Points
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 99% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 90675 avg: 111796 median: 114430 (66%) max: 127283 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 92% 84% 78% 100% 88% 91% 96% 71% 82% 89% 94%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6340 avg: 6848 median: 6892.5 (82%) max: 7177 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 98% 99% 100% 100% 97% 94% 99% 90% 95% 98% 99%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
217.7 fps (76%)
41 fps (14%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 130 W 19% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
387.7 fps (89%)
160 fps (37%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 130 W 41% 100%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 23.5 avg: 29.1 median: 29.4 (52%) max: 34.4 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 90% 81% 73% 100% 84% 85% 93% 68% 78% 84% 91%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.1 avg: 2.3 median: 2.3 (0%) max: 2.4 GB/s
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 88% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 4.1 avg: 4.3 median: 4.3 (73%) max: 4.4 GB/s
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 93% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.2 avg: 17 median: 17 (44%) max: 18.8 GB/s
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 81% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 175 avg: 210.7 median: 202 (3%) max: 275 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 101% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 100% 101% 101% 101%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 101 avg: 117.9 median: 114 (1%) max: 153 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.375 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.4564 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 101% 102% 101% 102% 101% 101% 101% 100% 101% 102% 102%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 16591 avg: 17802 median: 18036.5 (38%) max: 18235 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 130 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 99% 91% 100% 97% 99% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.2 avg: 6.2 median: 6.2 (1%) max: 6.215 s
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 100% 100%
9.7 s (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 100% 101% 101%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.4 s (1%)
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 100% 100%
21.9 s (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 315 avg: 315.1 median: 315.1 (1%) max: 315.265 s
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 100% 100%
518 s (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 100% 101% 101%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74788 avg: 76276 median: 76275.5 (67%) max: 77763 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 130 W 96% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19090 avg: 23115 median: 23699 (64%) max: 25681 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 93% 98% 88% 100% 100% 82% 97% 76% 84% 97% 96%
8304 Points (22%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 87% 98% 88% 100% 100% 82% 97% 76% 84% 97% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77043 avg: 86045 median: 83045 (67%) max: 101046 Points
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W 84% 100% 76% 80%
48854 Points (40%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W 48% 84% 100% 76% 80%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82808 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
85007 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16532 avg: 21282 median: 21573 (55%) max: 23984 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 97% 86% 85% 89% 100% 78% 86% 96% 97%
6757 Points (17%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 63% 86% 85% 89% 100% 78% 86% 96% 97%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 28693 avg: 37016 median: 37598.5 (67%) max: 43004 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 92% 89% 83% 100% 81% 85% 84% 67% 81% 88% 91%
9407 Points (17%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 78% 89% 83% 100% 81% 85% 84% 67% 81% 88% 91%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13288 avg: 15195 median: 14988 (63%) max: 18304 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 87% 92% 89% 100% 83% 83% 86% 75% 82% 84% 82%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2548 avg: 2720 median: 2720 (73%) max: 2892 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 135 W 100% 88%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 15031 avg: 16523 median: 16522.5 (65%) max: 18014 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 135 W 100% 83%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1345 avg: 1988 median: 2036 (86%) max: 2093 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 98% 99% 99% 100% 99% 93% 97% 87% 84% 98% 98%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17614 avg: 19809 median: 19982 (36%) max: 21075 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 98% 98% 92% 100% 94% 96% 100% 85% 90% 92% 99%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1804 avg: 1964 median: 1982 (9%) max: 2064 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W 96% 96% 100% 87%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18612 avg: 19451 median: 19027 (60%) max: 20594 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W 98% 91% 100% 92%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8706 avg: 8840 median: 8843 (88%) max: 8936 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 99% 100% 99%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 66537 avg: 70316 median: 71143 (78%) max: 71700 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 130 W 100% 93% 100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 453 avg: 471.3 median: 463.5 (1%) max: 520 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 95898 avg: 101964 median: 104390 (92%) max: 105526 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 100% 91% 99% 99%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 243 avg: 288.7 median: 291 (84%) max: 304 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 94% 100% 98% 99% 95% 94% 92% 90% 94% 100%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 266 avg: 322.6 median: 322 (67%) max: 358 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 93% 94% 98% 100% 92% 95% 94% 88% 94% 95%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1825 avg: 2064 median: 2113 (81%) max: 2295 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 91% 95% 94% 100% 83% 89% 98% 84% 97%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 106.1 avg: 171.8 median: 175.4 (30%) max: 231 Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 112% 115% 104% 100% 108% 121% 113% 112% 113%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 176 avg: 217.8 median: 223 (41%) max: 266 Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 160 W 113% 118% 106% 114% 100% 124% 100% 108%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.9 avg: 23.8 median: 25 (17%) max: 31.5 Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 105% 108% 115% 110% 106% 100% 104% 109% 105%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15 avg: 19.9 median: 19 (21%) max: 29 Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 86 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W TDP 132 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W TDP 160 W 117% 112% 123% 113% 108% 100% 118% 121% 119%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 19.5 avg: 20.7 median: 20.8 (15%) max: 21.8 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 99 W TDP 110 W TDP 130 W 94% 100% 96% 89%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900HX → 100% n=19 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-4790T → 51% n=19
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 04. 18:51:50
#0 checking url part for id 14659 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 6675 +0s ... 0s
#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720111910 +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14659 +0.006s ... 0.01s
#7 got single benchmarks 14659 +0.03s ... 0.041s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6675 +0.001s ... 0.042s
#9 got single benchmarks 6675 +0.003s ... 0.045s
#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s
#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.093s
#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.095s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)