Intel Core i9-12900HK ► remove from comparison Der Intel Core i9-12900HK ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur, die im Januar 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-P Chip (für H und P-Serie) und bietet alle 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 20 Threads) und takten von 2,5 bis 5 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,8 - 3,8 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6920HQ ). Die K-Variante bezeichnet den freien Multiplikator, wodurch sich die CPU übertakten lässt. Im Unterschied zum 12900H, bietet der 12900HK nur die "Essentials"-Features von vPro.
Performance
Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-11980HK (Tiger Lake-H mit 8 Kernen) kann der 12900HK in allen Bereichen punkten. Die neuen Golden Cove Kerne bieten eine leicht höhere Single Thread Performance und dank der gesamt 14 Kerne können Multi-Thread-Anwendungen deutlich beschleunigt werden. Intel gibt z.b. bei Spielen eine durchschnittlich 13% höhere Performance an und bei Blender Rendering 30% weniger Renderzeit (BMW Car Demo). In unseren Tests ist die Performance stark abhängig von den TDP Settings und der Kühlung und kann sich im Schnitt etwas vom Ryzen 9 6900HX absetzen (+11% zur Zeit des Schreibens, siehe Vergleich ).
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12900HK sind alle 96 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,45 GHz.
Features
Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200 und LPDDR4x-4267. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt nur PCIe 4.0 (x8 for GPU und zwei x4 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i9-12900HK ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (PL2 115 Watt). Die meisten Notebooks werden aber einen PL1 von etwa 60 Watt erlauben. Bei geringer Last, sollte der Stromverbrauch dank der sparsamen Gracemont Kerne sehr gut sein. Gefertigt wird der 12900HK im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).
Intel Celeron J4125 ► remove from comparison Der I ntel Celeron J4125 ist ein Ende 2019 vorgestellter Quad-Core-SoC, der hauptsächlich in preiswerten Mini-PCs verbaut wird. Er taktet mit 2 bis 2,7 GHz (Einzelkern Burst) und gehört der Gemini-Lake-Refresh-Plattform an. Neben den vier CPU-Kernen integriert der Chip auch eine DirectX-12-fähige Grafikeinheit sowie einen DDR4/LPDDR4-Speichercontroller (Dual-Channel, 2.400 MHz). Der SoC kann nicht ausgetauscht werden, da er direkt mit dem Mainboard verlötet wird (BGA Package).
Architektur
Die Prozessor-Architektur der Gemini Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger leicht weiterentwickelt. Intel nennt sie nun Goldmont Plus Kerne und verdoppelt den Level 2 Cache von 2 auf 4 MB. Trotzdem sollte die Pro-MHz-Leistung noch deutlich hinter den aktuellen Kaby-Lake Prozessoren bleiben.
Performance
Die CPU-Leistung des Celeron J4125 mit 4 CPU-Kernen und einer Taktrate von 2 bis 2,7 GHz dürfte stark vom Kühlsystem abhängen. In Mini-PCs ist die Kühlung meist besser und auch aktiv geregelt (per Lüfter), wodurch der SoC z.b. den Celeron N4120 für Notebooks abhängen kann. Trotzdem gehört die Leistung zur absoluten Einsteigerklasse in 2020. Der J4125 bewältigt jedoch problemlos die meisten Alltagsanwendungen (Office, Browsing) und ist auch für moderates Multitasking geeignet.
Grafik
Die integrierte UHD Graphics 600 unterscheidet sich nur durch die verbesserten Displayanschlüsse von der HD Graphics 500. Die Grafikkarte taktet mit 250 - 750 MHz und damit relativ hoch für Gemini-Lake-SoCs.
Weiterhin integriert der Chip eine fortschrittliche Videoeinheit, die auch die hardwarebeschleunigte Wiedergabe von VP9- und H.265-Material (8 Bit Farbtiefe) beherrscht.
Leistungsaufnahme
Der gesamte SoC wird von Intel wie der Vorgänger mit einer TDP von 10 Watt spezifiziert und damit deutlich höher als der mobilen Celeron N4120 mit 6 Watt.
Model Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Celeron J4125 Codename Alder Lake-H Gemini Lake Refresh Series Intel Alder Lake-P Intel Gemini Lake Serie: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake Refresh Clock 1800 - 5000 MHz 2000 - 2700 MHz L1 Cache 1.2 MB L2 Cache 11.5 MB 4 MB L3 Cache 24 MB Cores / Threads 14 / 20 4 / 4 TDP 45 Watt 10 Watt Technology 10 nm 14 nm max. Temp. 100 °C 105 °C Socket BGA1744 BGA1090 Features DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA DDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX iGPU Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900HK
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4125
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 105 avg: 109.5 median: 109.5 (62%) max: 114 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 92% 100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 746 avg: 811 median: 811 (15%) max: 876 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 100% 85%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13410 avg: 17662 median: 18373 (17%) max: 19282 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 77% 82% 71% 96% 97% 100% 100%
min: 860 avg: 1203 median: 1186 (1%) max: 1563 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 66% 5% 82% 71% 96% 97% 100% 100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1586 avg: 1797 median: 1901 (81%) max: 1940 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 76% 97% 82% 100% 98% 86% 98%
min: 392 avg: 425.3 median: 438 (19%) max: 446 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 68% 21% 97% 82% 100% 98% 86% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 596 avg: 679 median: 685 (76%) max: 739 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 81% 99% 83% 93% 100% 81% 99%
min: 155 avg: 166.2 median: 170 (19%) max: 174 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 59% 22% 99% 83% 93% 100% 81% 99%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5168 avg: 6742 median: 7040 (17%) max: 7366 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 77% 83% 72% 96% 95% 100% 100%
min: 304 avg: 449.2 median: 430 (1%) max: 610 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 51% 5% 83% 72% 96% 95% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1975 avg: 2695 median: 2836 (18%) max: 2944 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 72% 84% 68% 95% 100% 98% 100%
min: 148 avg: 223.4 median: 243 (2%) max: 271 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 48% 6% 84% 68% 95% 100% 98% 100%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 226 avg: 258.1 median: 270 (76%) max: 279 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 79% 96% 81% 100% 99% 86% 97%
min: 63.1 avg: 72.5 median: 75.3 (21%) max: 79.1 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 60% 23% 96% 81% 100% 99% 86% 97%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 23.44 avg: 27.9 median: 27.3 (35%) max: 33 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 83% 71% 100%
min: 2.13 avg: 2.8 median: 3.1 (4%) max: 3.09 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 9% 6% 83% 71% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.69 avg: 3.1 median: 3.3 (77%) max: 3.28 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 99% 82% 100%
min: 0.84 avg: 0.9 median: 0.9 (20%) max: 0.92 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 27% 26% 99% 82% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7710 avg: 8840 median: 9397 (57%) max: 9412 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 82% 100%
min: 2070 avg: 2159 median: 2112 (13%) max: 2295 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 23% 22% 100% 82% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 48838 avg: 51988 median: 49924 (36%) max: 57202 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 87% 85% 100%
min: 4102 avg: 6188 median: 7128 (5%) max: 7335 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 13% 7% 87% 85% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 75223 avg: 75585 median: 75585 (48%) max: 75947 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 99%
min: 9697 avg: 10201 median: 10201 (7%) max: 10705 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 14% 13% 100% 99%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12378 avg: 13841 median: 13840.5 (17%) max: 15303 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 81%
min: 3669 avg: 3690 median: 3690 (4%) max: 3711 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 24% 24% 100% 81%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 186.394 avg: 193.7 median: 193.7 (2%) max: 201.062 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 100%
min: 566 avg: 608 median: 603 (7%) max: 654.159 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 101% 100% 106% 106%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.375 avg: 3.4 median: 3.4 (1%) max: 3.454 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 100%
min: 17.3 avg: 18 median: 17.4 (3%) max: 19.42 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 100% 103% 103%
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7387 avg: 8565 median: 8735 (14%) max: 9573 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 91% 77% 100%
min: 1019 avg: 1069 median: 1048 (2%) max: 1140 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 11% 11% 91% 77% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 55620 avg: 68839 median: 72836 (42%) max: 75564 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 82% 85% 77% 93% 99% 100% 94%
min: 5694 avg: 7248 median: 7494 (4%) max: 8399 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 55% 9% 85% 77% 93% 99% 100% 94%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5257 avg: 5769 median: 5803 (68%) max: 6186 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 82% 98% 86% 100% 99% 85% 94%
min: 2237 avg: 2358 median: 2369 (28%) max: 2444 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 66% 37% 98% 86% 100% 99% 85% 94%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 113.7 avg: 132.8 median: 125.1 (42%) max: 159.6 fps
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 78% 71% 100%
min: 11.31 avg: 13.7 median: 13.1 (4%) max: 16.75 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 9% 8% 78% 71% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 276 avg: 298 median: 300.4 (69%) max: 317.5 fps
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 87% 95%
min: 52.6 avg: 64.3 median: 61.4 (14%) max: 78.9 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 21% 19% 100% 87% 95%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 15.7 avg: 19.4 median: 20.5 (36%) max: 21.6 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 77% 81% 73% 85% 93% 96% 100%
min: 0.95 avg: 1.4 median: 1.5 (3%) max: 1.61 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 51% 5% 81% 73% 85% 93% 96% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2 avg: 1.3 median: 1.3 (38%) max: 1.5 GB/s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 80% 87% 100%
min: 0.163 avg: 0.2 median: 0.2 (5%) max: 0.182 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 12% 11% 80% 87% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.2 avg: 2.4 median: 2.3 (40%) max: 2.6 GB/s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 85% 88% 100%
min: 0.196 avg: 0.2 median: 0.3 (5%) max: 0.266 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 10% 8% 85% 88% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 13 avg: 14.5 median: 14.1 (37%) max: 16.3 GB/s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 80% 87% 100%
min: 1.8 avg: 1.8 median: 1.8 (5%) max: 1.9 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 11% 11% 80% 87% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
CPU TDP 10 W TDP 45 W 0% 0%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 172.5 avg: 191.9 median: 181 (1%) max: 234 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101%
min: 2198 avg: 2772 median: 2391 (17%) max: 3860 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 121% 100% 130% 130% 130% 130% 130% 130%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4155 avg: 0.5 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.4997 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 103% 102% 104% 104% 102% 104%
min: 1.525 avg: 1.6 median: 1.6 (34%) max: 1.579 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 119% 100% 136% 134% 137% 136% 134% 136%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13096 avg: 15289 median: 15597.5 (33%) max: 16864 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 86% 78% 100% 99%
min: 2373 avg: 3327 median: 3740 (8%) max: 3869 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 23% 14% 86% 78% 100% 99%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.281 avg: 7.7 median: 7.3 (2%) max: 8.438 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100%
min: 24.57 avg: 31.6 median: 24.6 (5%) max: 45.52 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 102% 106% 106% 106%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.1 avg: 17.2 median: 16.5 (1%) max: 18.844 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100%
min: 55.9 avg: 68.9 median: 57.4 (2%) max: 93.4 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 101% 103% 102% 103%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 383.9 avg: 405.7 median: 397.4 (2%) max: 435.936 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100%
min: 1332.53 avg: 3652 median: 1845 (8%) max: 7778 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 120% 125% 125% 125%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 59882 avg: 65775 median: 60056 (46%) max: 77386 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 78% 77% 100%
min: 3522 avg: 5431 median: 5430.5 (4%) max: 7339 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 9% 5% 78% 77% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17378 avg: 22097 median: 22297.5 (56%) max: 25556 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 73% 85% 70% 98% 94% 84% 100%
min: 2348 avg: 2705 median: 2706 (7%) max: 2986 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 53% 10% 85% 70% 98% 94% 84% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 66129 avg: 78262 median: 71995 (58%) max: 96663 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 100% 68% 74%
min: 10102 avg: 19782 median: 19782 (16%) max: 29462 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 30% 10% 100% 68% 74%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 65657 avg: 78481 median: 72055 (58%) max: 97730 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 100% 67% 74%
min: 11105 avg: 23313 median: 29231 (24%) max: 29602 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 30% 11% 100% 67% 74%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 75600 avg: 88980 median: 88770 (74%) max: 102779 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W 100% 74% 92% 81%
min: 17507 avg: 26606 median: 26606 (22%) max: 35705 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W 35% 17% 100% 74% 92% 81%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16214 avg: 18700 median: 18585 (47%) max: 21231 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 89% 76% 92% 94% 83% 100%
min: 1196 avg: 2273 median: 2485 (6%) max: 2804 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 12% 8% 89% 76% 92% 94% 83% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23308 avg: 27794 median: 28300 (50%) max: 31045 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 73% 87% 75% 94% 100% 86% 97%
min: 1602 avg: 3372 median: 3689 (7%) max: 4271 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 55% 8% 87% 75% 94% 100% 86% 97%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9449 avg: 12247 median: 12430.5 (52%) max: 14252 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 69% 83% 66% 90% 98% 82% 100%
min: 876 avg: 994 median: 984 (4%) max: 1122 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 54% 6% 83% 66% 90% 98% 82% 100%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1596 avg: 1793 median: 1868 (73%) max: 1918 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 80% 97% 97% 100% 83% 98%
min: 435 avg: 454.2 median: 455 (18%) max: 466 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 59% 24% 97% 97% 100% 83% 98%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10378 avg: 13176 median: 13682.5 (25%) max: 14294 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 76% 87% 100% 98% 91% 99%
min: 1198 avg: 1367 median: 1394 (2%) max: 1512 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 52% 9% 87% 100% 98% 91% 99%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1795 avg: 1834 median: 1848 (8%) max: 1859 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 97% 100% 99%
min: 451 avg: 455.7 median: 453 (2%) max: 463 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 25% 24% 97% 100% 99%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10276 avg: 12524 median: 13538 (43%) max: 13757 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 75% 100% 98%
min: 1163 avg: 1388 median: 1482 (5%) max: 1519 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 11% 8% 75% 100% 98%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7925 avg: 7957 median: 7932 (79%) max: 8015 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 99% 99% 100%
min: 1922 avg: 1948 median: 1924 (19%) max: 1997 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 24% 24% 99% 99% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 39510 avg: 46971 median: 50218 (50%) max: 51184 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 77% 98% 100%
min: 4246 avg: 5158 median: 5468 (5%) max: 5761 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 11% 8% 77% 98% 100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 490 avg: 520 median: 499 (1%) max: 582 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 2216 avg: 2258 median: 2276 (3%) max: 2291 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 101% 100% 102% 102% 102% 102% 102% 102%
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 102.4 avg: 107.1 median: 107.1 (1%) max: 111.7 ms
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 249 avg: 259 median: 259 (73%) max: 269 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 93%
CPU TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 25% 100% 93%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 285 avg: 303.2 median: 300 (55%) max: 331 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 44% 95% 86% 100% 95% 87% 90%
min: 86.2 avg: 89.2 median: 88.7 (16%) max: 93.2 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 32% 28% 95% 86% 100% 95% 87% 90%
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1727 avg: 1945 median: 1944.5 (74%) max: 2138 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 74% 94% 85% 100% 82% 90%
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 74% 16% 94% 85% 100% 82% 90%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 82.3 avg: 117 median: 117.5 (20%) max: 174.7 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 122% 122% 112% 115% 113% 100%
min: 7.87 avg: 12.5 median: 12.4 (2%) max: 17.4 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 139% 141% 122% 122% 112% 115% 113% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 77.7 avg: 130.6 median: 138.5 (25%) max: 166 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 117% 123% 106% 108% 100% 100%
min: 9.24 avg: 11 median: 11.4 (2%) max: 12.3 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 140% 141% 117% 123% 106% 108% 100% 100%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.2 avg: 38.1 median: 38.1 (25%) max: 63 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 156% 100%
CPU TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 168% 156% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.2 avg: 20.7 median: 20.6 (15%) max: 25.4 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 95% 100% 76% 85% 68% 69%
min: 13 avg: 18.4 median: 19.8 (15%) max: 22.4 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 10 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 78% 70% 95% 100% 76% 85% 68% 69%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900HK → 100% n=48 Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4125 → 19% n=48
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 23. 08:50:30
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 14041 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 12749 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734940230s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14041 +0.002s ... 0.006s
#8 got single benchmarks 14041 +0.002s ... 0.008s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12749 +0.004s ... 0.012s
#10 got single benchmarks 12749 +0.007s ... 0.02s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.061s
#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.063s