Intel Core i9-12900HK vs Intel Celeron J4005
Intel Core i9-12900HK ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-12900HK ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur, die im Januar 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-P Chip (für H und P-Serie) und bietet alle 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 20 Threads) und takten von 2,5 bis 5 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,8 - 3,8 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6920HQ ). Die K-Variante bezeichnet den freien Multiplikator, wodurch sich die CPU übertakten lässt. Im Unterschied zum 12900H, bietet der 12900HK nur die "Essentials"-Features von vPro.
Performance
Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-11980HK (Tiger Lake-H mit 8 Kernen) kann der 12900HK in allen Bereichen punkten. Die neuen Golden Cove Kerne bieten eine leicht höhere Single Thread Performance und dank der gesamt 14 Kerne können Multi-Thread-Anwendungen deutlich beschleunigt werden. Intel gibt z.b. bei Spielen eine durchschnittlich 13% höhere Performance an und bei Blender Rendering 30% weniger Renderzeit (BMW Car Demo). In unseren Tests ist die Performance stark abhängig von den TDP Settings und der Kühlung und kann sich im Schnitt etwas vom Ryzen 9 6900HX absetzen (+11% zur Zeit des Schreibens, siehe Vergleich ).
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12900HK sind alle 96 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,45 GHz.
Features
Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200 und LPDDR4x-4267. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt nur PCIe 4.0 (x8 for GPU und zwei x4 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i9-12900HK ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (PL2 115 Watt). Die meisten Notebooks werden aber einen PL1 von etwa 60 Watt erlauben. Bei geringer Last, sollte der Stromverbrauch dank der sparsamen Gracemont Kerne sehr gut sein. Gefertigt wird der 12900HK im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).
Intel Celeron J4005 ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Celeron J4005 ist ein sparsamer 2,0 GHz schneller Dual-Core-Prozessor auf Basis der neuen Gemini-Lake-Architektur und wurde Ende 2017 vorgestellt. Viele Features wie, AES, SHA und auch die Turbo Boost Funktionen bietet der kleine Einstiegs SoC. Im Turbo kann der Intel Celeron J4005 mit bis zu 2,7 GHz getaktet werden. Der SoC wird im 14-Nanometer-Prozesses mit FinFETs gefertigt und ist fest im System verbaut.
Die Änderungen im Vergleich zur Vorgängerserie zeigen sich auch beim L2-Cache, welcher nun mit 4 MB statt 2 MB, doppelt so groß ist. Alle neuen Gemini-Lake-SoCs unterstützen DDR4-RAM mit maximal 2.400 MHz (auch Low Power RAM).
Zum Einsatz kommen die neuen SoCs vor allem im Einstiegssegment. So werden günstige Mini-ITX Mainboards und Mini-PCs im zu finden sein, welche die neuen stromsparenden Prozessoren beheimaten. Aber auch om Destktop-Segment wird Intel die aktuellsten NUC mit den heuen SoCs ausstatten.
Mit der Intel UHD Graphics 600 bietet der Prozessor eine integrierte Grafikeinheit. Beim Intel Celeron J4005 bietet die Intel UHD Graphics 600 12 EUs und taktet mit 250 MHz bis 700 MHz.
Architektur
Die Prozessor-Architektur der Gemini Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger leicht weiterentwickelt. Intel nennt sie nun Goldmont Plus Kerne und verdoppelt den Level 2 Cache von 2 auf 4 MB. Trotzdem sollte die Pro-MHz-Leistung noch deutlich hinter den aktuellen Kaby-Lake Prozessoren bleiben.
Model Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Celeron J4005 Series Intel Alder Lake-P Intel Gemini Lake Codename Alder Lake-H Gemini Lake Serie: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake Clock 1800 - 5000 MHz 2000 - 2700 MHz L1 Cache 1.2 MB 112 KB L2 Cache 11.5 MB 4 MB L3 Cache 24 MB Cores / Threads 14 / 20 2 / 2 TDP 45 Watt 10 Watt Technology 10 nm 14 nm max. Temp. 100 °C 105 °C Socket BGA1744 BGA1090 Features DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA DDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX iGPU Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com $107 U.S.
Benchmarks Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 105 avg: 109.5 median: 109.5 (62%) max: 114 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 92% 100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 746 avg: 811 median: 811 (15%) max: 876 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 100% 85%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13410 avg: 17662 median: 18373 (17%) max: 19282 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 77% 82% 71% 96% 97% 100% 100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1586 avg: 1797 median: 1901 (81%) max: 1940 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 76% 97% 82% 100% 98% 86% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 596 avg: 679 median: 685 (76%) max: 739 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 81% 99% 83% 93% 100% 81% 99%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5168 avg: 6742 median: 7040 (17%) max: 7366 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 77% 83% 72% 96% 95% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1975 avg: 2695 median: 2836 (18%) max: 2944 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 72% 84% 68% 95% 100% 98% 100%
144 Points (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 61% 84% 68% 95% 100% 98% 100%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 226 avg: 258.1 median: 270 (76%) max: 279 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 79% 96% 81% 100% 99% 86% 97%
77 Points (22%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 71% 96% 81% 100% 99% 86% 97%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 23.44 avg: 27.9 median: 27.3 (35%) max: 33 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 83% 71% 100%
1.4 Points (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 4% 83% 71% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.69 avg: 3.1 median: 3.3 (77%) max: 3.28 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 99% 82% 100%
0.9 Points (20%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 26% 99% 82% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7710 avg: 8840 median: 9397 (57%) max: 9412 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 82% 100%
2085 Points (13%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 22% 100% 82% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 48838 avg: 51988 median: 49924 (36%) max: 57202 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 87% 85% 100%
3500 Points (3%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 6% 87% 85% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 75223 avg: 75585 median: 75585 (48%) max: 75947 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 99%
4741 Points (3%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 6% 100% 99%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12378 avg: 13841 median: 13840.5 (17%) max: 15303 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 81%
3365 Points (4%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 22% 100% 81%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 186.394 avg: 193.7 median: 193.7 (9%) max: 201.062 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 101% 100%
1042 s (50%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 181% 179%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.375 avg: 3.4 median: 3.4 (5%) max: 3.454 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 100%
33.1 s (52%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 198% 198%
min: 7387 avg: 8565 median: 8735 (14%) max: 9573 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 91% 77% 100%
798 Points (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 8% 91% 77% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 55620 avg: 68839 median: 72836 (42%) max: 75564 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 82% 85% 77% 93% 99% 100% 94%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5257 avg: 5769 median: 5803 (68%) max: 6186 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 82% 98% 86% 100% 99% 85% 94%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 113.7 avg: 132.8 median: 125.1 (42%) max: 159.6 fps
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 78% 71% 100%
10 fps (3%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 6% 78% 71% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 276 avg: 298 median: 300.4 (69%) max: 317.5 fps
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 87% 95%
49.9 fps (12%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 16% 100% 87% 95%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 15.7 avg: 19.4 median: 20.5 (36%) max: 21.6 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 77% 81% 73% 85% 93% 96% 100%
0.9 fps (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 65% 81% 73% 85% 93% 96% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2 avg: 1.3 median: 1.3 (38%) max: 1.5 GB/s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 80% 87% 100%
0.1 GB/s (3%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 6% 80% 87% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.2 avg: 2.4 median: 2.3 (40%) max: 2.6 GB/s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 85% 88% 100%
0.1 GB/s (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 5% 85% 88% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 13 avg: 14.5 median: 14.1 (37%) max: 16.3 GB/s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 80% 87% 100%
1 GB/s (3%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 6% 80% 87% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
413 Seconds (10%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 172.5 avg: 191.9 median: 181 (5%) max: 234 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 101% 101% 101% 102% 102% 102%
min: 4124 avg: 4124 median: 4124 (106%) max: 3895 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 128% 128% 129% 130% 130% 130%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4155 avg: 0.5 median: 0.4 (21%) max: 0.4997 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 109% 105% 111% 110% 106% 110%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13096 avg: 15289 median: 15597.5 (33%) max: 16864 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 86% 78% 100% 99%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.281 avg: 7.7 median: 7.3 (22%) max: 8.438 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 105% 100% 105%
16.3 s (49%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 154% 147% 154%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.1 avg: 17.2 median: 16.5 (21%) max: 18.844 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 104% 100% 105%
35.9 s (46%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 146% 141% 147%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 383.9 avg: 405.7 median: 397.4 (21%) max: 435.936 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 103% 100% 103%
1245 s (64%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 224% 218% 226%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 59882 avg: 65775 median: 60056 (46%) max: 77386 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 78% 77% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17378 avg: 22097 median: 22297.5 (56%) max: 25556 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 73% 85% 70% 98% 94% 84% 100%
1877 Points (5%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 64% 85% 70% 98% 94% 84% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 66129 avg: 78262 median: 71995 (58%) max: 96663 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 100% 68% 74%
18895 Points (15%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 20% 100% 68% 74%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 65657 avg: 78481 median: 72055 (58%) max: 97730 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 100% 67% 74%
18968 Points (15%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 19% 100% 67% 74%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 75600 avg: 88980 median: 88770 (74%) max: 102779 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W 100% 74% 92% 81%
19351 Points (16%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W 19% 100% 74% 92% 81%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16214 avg: 18700 median: 18585 (47%) max: 21231 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 89% 76% 92% 94% 83% 100%
1577 Points (4%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 7% 89% 76% 92% 94% 83% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23308 avg: 27794 median: 28300 (50%) max: 31045 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 73% 87% 75% 94% 100% 86% 97%
2241 Points (4%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 65% 87% 75% 94% 100% 86% 97%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9449 avg: 12247 median: 12430.5 (52%) max: 14252 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 69% 83% 66% 90% 98% 82% 100%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
2611 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
10721 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1596 avg: 1793 median: 1868 (73%) max: 1918 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 80% 97% 97% 100% 83% 98%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10378 avg: 13176 median: 13682.5 (25%) max: 14294 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 76% 87% 100% 98% 91% 99%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1795 avg: 1834 median: 1848 (8%) max: 1859 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 97% 100% 99%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10276 avg: 12524 median: 13538 (43%) max: 13757 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 75% 100% 98%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7925 avg: 7957 median: 7932 (79%) max: 8015 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 99% 99% 100%
1997 Points (20%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 25% 99% 99% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 39510 avg: 46971 median: 50218 (50%) max: 51184 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 77% 98% 100%
3491 Points (3%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 7% 77% 98% 100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 490 avg: 520 median: 499 (2%) max: 582 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 102.4 avg: 107.1 median: 107.1 (13%) max: 111.7 ms
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 101% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94352 Points (79%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 249 avg: 259 median: 259 (73%) max: 269 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 93%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 285 avg: 303.2 median: 300 (55%) max: 331 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 44% 95% 86% 100% 95% 87% 90%
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
43.3 MB/s (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
2539 MB/s (74%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
81.5 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
3600 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
20584 Points (85%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1727 avg: 1945 median: 1944.5 (74%) max: 2138 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 74% 94% 85% 100% 82% 90%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 82.3 avg: 117 median: 117.5 (20%) max: 174.7 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 122% 122% 112% 115% 113% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 77.7 avg: 130.6 median: 138.5 (25%) max: 166 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 117% 123% 106% 108% 100% 100%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.2 avg: 38.1 median: 38.1 (25%) max: 63 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 156% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.2 avg: 20.7 median: 20.6 (15%) max: 25.4 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 95% 100% 76% 85% 68% 69%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900HK → 100% n=29 Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4005 → 16% n=29
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
Errors
[Close]
#0 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 4124>3895 for benchmark 496, setting:1438 +0s ... 0.087s
log 10. 05:17:04
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 14041 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10044 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731212224s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:16:49 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14041 +0.001s ... 0.005s
#8 got single benchmarks 14041 +0.016s ... 0.02s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10044 +0.001s ... 0.021s
#10 got single benchmarks 10044 +0.004s ... 0.024s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s
#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.035s
#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.038s
#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.043s
#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.047s
#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.051s
#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.055s
#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.058s
#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.06s
#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.063s
#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.065s
#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.068s
#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.073s
#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.075s
#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.077s
#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.079s
#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.082s
#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.084s
#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.087s
#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.093s
#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.096s
#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.098s
#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.102s
#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.107s
#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.111s
#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.115s
#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.12s
#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.125s
#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.012s ... 0.137s
#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.139s
#41 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.158s
#42 return log +0.002s ... 0.16s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte