Intel Core i7-12650H vs Intel Core i5-9300H
Intel Core i7-12650H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i7-12650H ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur, die im Januar 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-P Chip (für H und P-Serie) und bietet alle 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 4 der 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 16 Threads) und takten von 2,3 bis 4,7 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,7 - 3,5 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6700HQ ). Im Vergleich zum 12700H bietet der 12650H nur halb so viele E-Kerne und eine schwächere iGPU. Auch vPro wird gar nicht unterstützt.
Performance
Durch die 10 Kerne sollte die Multithread-Leistung oberhalb der alten Tiger-Lake-8-Kerner (bei vergleichbaren Takt, wie der i7-11800H mit bis zu 4,8 GHz) liegen. Bei der Einzelkernperformance dürfte der 12650H auch noch schneller sein, dank der neuen Architektur.
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12650H sind nur 64 der 96 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,4 GHz.
Features
Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200 und LPDDR4x-4267. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt nur PCIe 4.0 (x8 for GPU und zwei x4 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i7-12650H ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (115W PL2). Bei geringer Last, sollte der Stromverbrauch dank der sparsamen Gracemont Kerne sehr gut sein. Gefertigt wird der i7-12650H im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm).
Intel Core i5-9300H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i5-9300H ist ein Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der Coffee-Lake-Architektur (Refresh in 2019 CFL-HR) basiert. Er taktet die vier Prozessorkerne mit 2,4 - 4,1 GHz (Ein- und Zweikern Turbo) bzw. maximal 4 GHz wenn alle Kerne ausgelastet sind. Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann wahrscheinlich vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down). Im Vergleich zum Vorgänger dem Core i5-8300H wurde nur der Takt um 100 MHz (GPU +50 MHz) erhöht, sonst gibt es keine Unterschiede.
Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Coffee Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und Coffee Lake kann nur durch die leicht verbesserte Fertigung (14nm++) und die zusätzlichen Kerne punkten. Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet.
Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i5-9300H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks, per "configurable TDP-down" kann die CPU auch mit 35 Watt betrieben werden, bei geringerer Leistung (Turbo wird nicht so lange gehalten).
Model Intel Core i7-12650H Intel Core i5-9300H Series Intel Alder Lake-P Intel Coffee Lake Codename Alder Lake-H Coffee Lake-H Serie: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H Clock 1700 - 4700 MHz 2400 - 4100 MHz L1 Cache 864 KB 256 KB L2 Cache 9.5 MB 1 MB L3 Cache 24 MB 8 MB Cores / Threads 10 / 16 4 / 8 TDP 45 Watt 45 Watt Technology 10 nm 14 nm max. Temp. 100 °C 100 °C Socket BGA1744 FCBGA1440 Features DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1400 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com $250 U.S.
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12650H
37.1 pt (62%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9300H
28.2 pt (47%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 85 avg: 98 median: 99 (57%) max: 107 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 90% 100% 97%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 294 avg: 515 median: 530 (10%) max: 673 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 55% 83% 100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 5362 avg: 11525 median: 12074 (11%) max: 15537 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 77% 76% 100% 85% 91%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1428 avg: 1722 median: 1763 (75%) max: 1808 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 95% 98% 99% 100% 99%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 552 avg: 664 median: 679 (75%) max: 696 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 94% 97% 99% 99% 100%
min: 398 avg: 415.2 median: 419 (46%) max: 427 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 74% 97% 99% 99% 100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2106 avg: 4459 median: 4691 (11%) max: 6009 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 76% 77% 100% 84% 92%
min: 1530 avg: 1727 median: 1737 (4%) max: 1877 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 49% 77% 100% 84% 92%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 753 avg: 1770 median: 1851.5 (12%) max: 2253 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 76% 79% 100% 85% 97%
min: 717 avg: 784 median: 790 (5%) max: 850 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 50% 79% 100% 85% 97%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 206 avg: 245.1 median: 250 (70%) max: 261 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 95% 95% 95% 97% 100%
min: 169 avg: 172.6 median: 172 (48%) max: 176 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 77% 95% 95% 97% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.35 avg: 17.9 median: 18.2 (24%) max: 25.04 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 48% 78% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.52 avg: 2.9 median: 3 (70%) max: 3.15 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 86% 93% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7466 avg: 8300 median: 8301 (50%) max: 8903 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 88% 94% 100%
min: 6421 avg: 6561 median: 6572 (40%) max: 6677 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 78% 94% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 20693 avg: 35422 median: 34901.5 (25%) max: 49328 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 49% 77% 100%
min: 21798 avg: 24198 median: 24623 (18%) max: 25656 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 49% 77% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 29444 avg: 52500 median: 52008 (33%) max: 68516 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 67% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 11960 avg: 13177 median: 13397 (16%) max: 14533 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 96% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 266.983 avg: 410.5 median: 426 (5%) max: 483.853 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 102%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.705 avg: 6.5 median: 6.9 (1%) max: 8.743 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 100% 101% 100%
min: 6896 avg: 7773 median: 7731.5 (12%) max: 9090 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 85% 100% 99%
5663 Points (9%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 79% 100% 99%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 27053 avg: 46612 median: 47972 (28%) max: 59034 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 81% 79% 100% 87% 96%
min: 20736 avg: 22008 median: 22133 (13%) max: 23155 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 67% 79% 100% 87% 96%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5265 avg: 5635 median: 5702.5 (67%) max: 6116 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 97% 98% 100% 93% 99%
min: 4542 avg: 4592 median: 4609 (54%) max: 4626 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 91% 98% 100% 93% 99%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 53.8 avg: 91.5 median: 88.9 (30%) max: 127.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 52% 75% 100%
49.4 fps (17%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 48% 75% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 197.2 avg: 255.4 median: 262.5 (61%) max: 311.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 79% 95% 100%
193.7 fps (45%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 75% 95% 100%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.62 avg: 13.8 median: 14.3 (25%) max: 17.4 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 77% 75% 96% 83% 93% 100%
min: 5.7 avg: 6.1 median: 6 (11%) max: 6.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 63% 75% 96% 83% 93% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.674 avg: 0.9 median: 0.9 (26%) max: 1.2 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 61% 78% 100%
0.5 GB/s (15%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 55% 78% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.1 avg: 1.5 median: 1.5 (26%) max: 2.1 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 57% 75% 100%
0.8 GB/s (14%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 51% 75% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 6.7 avg: 9 median: 8.9 (23%) max: 11.8 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 61% 79% 100%
4.7 GB/s (12%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 54% 79% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 396 avg: 538 median: 479 (6%) max: 1029 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 100% 100% 102% 102% 103%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 222 avg: 299.8 median: 277 (2%) max: 553 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 100% 100% 101% 100% 101% 101%
min: 588 avg: 611 median: 602 (4%) max: 643 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4584 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (10%) max: 0.515 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 8344 avg: 12678 median: 12716 (27%) max: 18599 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 50% 65% 72% 100% 80%
min: 7787 avg: 8354 median: 8107 (17%) max: 9169 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 47% 65% 72% 100% 80%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.703 avg: 8 median: 7.9 (2%) max: 8.891 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100%
9.1 s (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.392 avg: 18 median: 17.6 (1%) max: 19.733 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100%
20.3 s (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 413.002 avg: 436.2 median: 433.5 (2%) max: 463.857 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100%
496 s (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 30717 avg: 53165 median: 53162 (41%) max: 75129 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 90 W 50% 75% 100%
26995 Points (21%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 90 W 45% 75% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9219 avg: 18466 median: 18363 (46%) max: 22811 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 67% 75% 98% 97% 100% 94%
min: 7499 avg: 8987 median: 9107 (23%) max: 10557 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 46% 75% 98% 97% 100% 94%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 57680 avg: 80244 median: 83501.5 (68%) max: 88686 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 90 W 81% 96% 100%
min: 52412 avg: 55875 median: 56000 (46%) max: 58466 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 90 W 68% 96% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 57559 avg: 81506 median: 85075.5 (69%) max: 89577 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 90 W 81% 98% 100%
min: 49250 avg: 54277 median: 54947 (45%) max: 58074 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 90 W 67% 98% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 80654 avg: 88077 median: 87546.5 (73%) max: 96373 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 98% 100% 97% 99%
min: 58114 avg: 58963 median: 58413 (48%) max: 61541 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 72% 100% 97% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8608 avg: 15722 median: 16486.5 (42%) max: 19297 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 67% 77% 96% 89% 100% 98%
min: 5356 avg: 7678 median: 7828.5 (20%) max: 8903 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 46% 77% 96% 89% 100% 98%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 12668 avg: 22820 median: 22920 (41%) max: 27558 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 71% 76% 96% 93% 100% 99%
min: 9387 avg: 11376 median: 11698 (21%) max: 12349 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 49% 76% 96% 93% 100% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4231 avg: 9365 median: 9953 (42%) max: 11800 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 66% 75% 100% 90% 92% 93%
min: 3165 avg: 4074 median: 4189 (18%) max: 4861 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 43% 75% 100% 90% 92% 93%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2131 avg: 2357 median: 2384 (63%) max: 2481 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 99% 97% 100%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 7608 avg: 9408 median: 9656 (38%) max: 11014 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 82% 84% 100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1590 avg: 1743 median: 1758 (69%) max: 1797 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 97% 96% 99% 97% 97% 100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6478 avg: 9797 median: 9784 (18%) max: 11284 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 82% 84% 98% 87% 93% 100%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1486 avg: 1677 median: 1705 (7%) max: 1766 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 97% 94% 98% 100% 100%
min: 1095 avg: 1118 median: 1123 (5%) max: 1137 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 81% 94% 98% 100% 100%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6287 avg: 9019 median: 9099 (29%) max: 11153 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 74% 74% 86% 100% 100%
min: 3697 avg: 4014 median: 4146 (13%) max: 4200 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 55% 74% 86% 100% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6711 avg: 7411 median: 7483 (75%) max: 7705 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 98% 95% 99% 100%
min: 4704 avg: 4898 median: 4901 (49%) max: 5089 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 74% 95% 99% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24621 avg: 34058 median: 34216 (34%) max: 41477 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 76% 77% 100% 100%
min: 14853 avg: 16246 median: 16541 (16%) max: 17684 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 50% 77% 100% 100%
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5266 Points (72%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
16911 Points (41%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14195 avg: 15338 median: 15527.5 (28%) max: 16101 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3596 avg: 3854 median: 3854.5 (75%) max: 4109 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 519 avg: 552 median: 542 (1%) max: 652 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 1079 avg: 1138 median: 1108.5 (1%) max: 1349 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
86 ms (1%)
86.6 ms (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85840 avg: 87864 median: 87864 (76%) max: 89888 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 80 W 95% 100%
min: 22225 avg: 32344 median: 33646 (29%) max: 34957 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 80 W 36% 95% 100%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 234 avg: 249.5 median: 250.5 (70%) max: 268 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 80 W 93% 93% 87% 100%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 265 avg: 291.3 median: 295.5 (62%) max: 309 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 99% 98% 89% 93% 100%
222 Points (46%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 94% 98% 89% 93% 100%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1532 avg: 1694 median: 1715 (66%) max: 1875 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 88% 95% 99% 100% 98%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.2 avg: 81.3 median: 78.3 (14%) max: 112.7 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 110% 107% 107% 100% 101%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 52.8 avg: 95.3 median: 91.4 (17%) max: 147 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 112% 110% 109% 106% 100%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.22 avg: 20.2 median: 20.1 (13%) max: 47.5 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W 107% 100% 118%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.04 avg: 8.4 median: 8.4 (9%) max: 9.8 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W 100% 103%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.3 avg: 18.9 median: 16.7 (12%) max: 24.2 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 57 W TDP 80 W 90% 100% 76% 73%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12650H → 100% n=36 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9300H → 61% n=36
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 10. 04:09:53
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 14051 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11356 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731208193s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14051 +0.005s ... 0.011s
#8 got single benchmarks 14051 +0.027s ... 0.037s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11356 +0.005s ... 0.043s
#10 got single benchmarks 11356 +0.021s ... 0.064s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.069s ... 0.133s
#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.135s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte