Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-1195G7 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Intel Core i7-1195G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1195G7

Der Intel Core i7-1195G7 ist ein sparsamer Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Tiger-Lake-Architektur basiert Mitte 2021 als Refresh vorgestellt wurde. Tiger Lake wird im verbesserten 10nm+-Verfahren (SuperFin genannt) bei Intel gefertigt und nutzt die neuen Willow Cove CPU-Kerne mit einer neuen Mikroarchitektur. Der Basistakt liegt zwischen 1,3 GHz (12 Watt TDP) bis 3,9 GHz (28 Watt TDP). Der Turbo kann bis zu 5 GHz erreichen (einzelner Kern mit Turbo Boost 3.0). Alle Kerne können maximal 4,6 GHz erreichen. Zum Zeitpunkt der Vorstellung ist der i7-1195G7 das schnellste Tiger-Lake-Modell. 

Die integrierte Intel Iris Xe G7 Grafikkarte (Gen 12) bietet alle 96 EUs bei einem Takt von 400 - 1400 MHz.

Wie bisher wird auch weiterhin WLAN (Wifi 6E) und Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 und 4 Lanes PCIe 4 im Chip (teil-)integriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks.

Der TDP kann bei den UP3 CPUs von 12 - 28 Watt gewählt werden (mit unterschiedlichem Basistakt) und dadurch eignet sich die CPU auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks.

Intel Core 2 Duo T8100

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 ist ein Mittelklasse Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks in 2008. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern und bietet alle Funktionen des Kerns (wie VT-x Virtualisierungsfunktionen). 

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2.1 GHz relativ langsam getaktet. Im Vergleich zum vergleichbaren T6500, bietet der T6570 jedoch Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

show full text
ModelIntel Core i7-1195G7Intel Core 2 Duo T8100Intel Core 2 Duo T6570
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3PenrynPenryn
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core i7-1195G7 « 2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G73 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G72.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G72.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G72.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G72.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G42 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G43 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 « 2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 « 2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2900 - 5000 MHz2100 MHz2100 MHz
L1 Cache320 KB
L2 Cache5 MB3 MB2 MB
L3 Cache12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 22 / 2
TDP28 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm45 nm45 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1449BGA479, PGA478PGA478
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAVirtualization VT-x, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit, Idle StatesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (400 - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
FSB800800
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Voltage1.000V-1.250V V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
$209 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1195G7
32.7 pt (54%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -93%
...
Intel Core i5-11320H
32.1 -2%
Intel Core i7-10870H
32.1 -2%
Intel Core i7-10875H
32.1 -2%
Intel Core i9-9980HK
32.2 -2%
Intel Core i3-1215U
32.2 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
32.2 -2%
Intel Core i7-1185G7
32.3 -1%
Intel Core i7-1165G7
32.4 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
32.6 0%
Intel Core i7-1195G7
32.7
Intel Core i5-1240U
32.7 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U
32.7 0%
Intel Core i7-1260U
32.8 0%
Intel Core i9-10980HK
32.8 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 5600U
32.9 1%
Intel Core i9-10885H
32.9 1%
Intel Xeon W-10885M
33 1%
Intel Core i5-11400H
33 1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
33.1 1%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 45%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 84%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
89 Points (50%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
307 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3142     avg: 5022     median: 5337 (5%)     max: 6806 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1290     avg: 1457     median: 1455 (62%)     max: 1624 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 498     avg: 563     median: 559 (62%)     max: 620 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1212     avg: 1907     median: 1932 (5%)     max: 2590 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 574     avg: 853     median: 940 (6%)     max: 999 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 198     avg: 221.4     median: 222 (62%)     max: 238 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.6 Points (14%)
12%
1 T6570 +
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.7 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 2217     avg: 2310     median: 2320 (14%)     max: 2357 Points
98%
1 T6570 +
min: 1589     avg: 2167     median: 2274 (14%)     max: 2314 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 4102     avg: 4251     median: 4282 (3%)     max: 4332 Points
100%
1 T6570 +
min: 2963     avg: 4042     median: 4276 (3%)     max: 4284 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40873 Points (26%)
12%
1 T6570 +
4768 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
12384 Points (15%)
20%
1 T6570 +
2462 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
281.4 s (3%)
24%
1 T6570 +
1170 s (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.2 s (2%)
37.5 s (8%)
36.8 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6334 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 17053     avg: 23469     median: 24669 (14%)     max: 26183 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5059     avg: 5409     median: 5386 (63%)     max: 5890 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.23     avg: 6.5     median: 6.6 (12%)     max: 8.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.6 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
6.4 GB/s (17%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 1058     avg: 1105     median: 1105 (14%)     max: 1152 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 473     avg: 691     median: 597.5 (4%)     max: 1211 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.53     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.611 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9989 Points (21%)
min: 1764     avg: 1851     median: 1878 (4%)     max: 1909 Points
min: 1326     avg: 1751     median: 1820 (4%)     max: 1886 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.7 s (1%)
min: 23     avg: 23.4     median: 23.1 (5%)     max: 24.23 s
min: 24     avg: 27.5     median: 25.1 (5%)     max: 36 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.7 s (1%)
min: 54.6     avg: 55.2     median: 55 (2%)     max: 56 s
min: 57.9     avg: 66.5     median: 61 (3%)     max: 86 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
354.2 s (2%)
1347 s (6%)
min: 1342     avg: 1534     median: 1344 (6%)     max: 1916 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T8100 +
19291 MIPS (9%)
98%
1 T6570 +
min: 15404     avg: 17907     median: 19000 (9%)     max: 19317 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T8100 +
15392 MFLOPS (12%)
92%
1 T6570 +
min: 10662     avg: 13404     median: 14160 (11%)     max: 15390 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 3250     avg: 4504     median: 4605 (10%)     max: 5677 Points
102%
1 T6570 +
min: 3419     avg: 4583     median: 4691 (10%)     max: 5134 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 4     avg: 4.8     median: 5 (71%)     max: 5.1 Points
102%
1 T6570 +
5.1 Points (73%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T6570 +
5 Points (64%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T8100 +
4046 Points (3%)
96%
1 T6570 +
min: 3764     avg: 3902     median: 3902 (3%)     max: 4040 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6684     avg: 10304     median: 10438.5 (26%)     max: 13153 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 63087     avg: 67596     median: 67595.5 (55%)     max: 72104 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 64343     avg: 67940     median: 67939.5 (55%)     max: 71536 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 65247     avg: 71962     median: 71962 (60%)     max: 78677 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5428     avg: 8477     median: 8745 (22%)     max: 10705 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 7982     avg: 12497     median: 13225 (24%)     max: 15514 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2687     avg: 4165     median: 4266 (18%)     max: 5913 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 1896     avg: 2064     median: 2064 (53%)     max: 2232 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 7596     avg: 7644     median: 7644 (30%)     max: 7692 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1519     avg: 1569     median: 1536 (60%)     max: 1649 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4241     avg: 4940     median: 4734 (8%)     max: 6349 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1575     avg: 1606     median: 1605.5 (7%)     max: 1636 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4683     avg: 5066     median: 5066 (16%)     max: 5449 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6818     avg: 6894     median: 6894 (69%)     max: 6970 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18904     avg: 20630     median: 20629.5 (21%)     max: 22355 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 594     avg: 664     median: 612 (1%)     max: 1047 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
118.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
69945 Points (58%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 195     avg: 255     median: 261 (48%)     max: 271 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1341     avg: 1412     median: 1435 (55%)     max: 1460 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 15.6     avg: 40.8     median: 36.7 (6%)     max: 65.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18.4     avg: 46     median: 49.3 (9%)     max: 66 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.32     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (4%)     max: 4.34 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.1     avg: 21.6     median: 20 (15%)     max: 35.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1195G7 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 → 25% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → 24% n=5

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 19. 18:51:28

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13181 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 380 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734630688s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:18:43 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13181 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#9 got single benchmarks 13181 +0.016s ... 0.022s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 380 +0.001s ... 0.023s

#11 got single benchmarks 380 +0.012s ... 0.035s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0.001s ... 0.036s

#13 got single benchmarks 466 +0.007s ... 0.042s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.084s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.084s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)