Intel Core i7-1185G7 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
Intel Core i7-1185G7 ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i7-1185G7 ist ein sparsamer Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Tiger-Lake-Architektur basiert und im September 2020 vorgestellt wurde. Tiger Lake wird im verbesserten 10nm+-Verfahren (SuperFin genannt) bei Intel gefertigt und nutzt die neuen Willow Cove CPU-Kerne mit einer neuen Mikroarchitektur. Der i7-1185G7 bietet vier Kerne mit 3 GHz Basistakt (bei 28 W TDP, 1,2 GHz bei 12 W) und 4,8 GHz Turbo-Takt (4,3 GHz für alle Kerne). Dadurch liegt die Leistung deutlich oberhalb des alten Ice-Lake basierten Core i7-1065G7 . Zum Zeitpunkt der Vorstellung ist der i7-1185G7 das schnellste Tiger-Lake-Modell. Seit Anfang 2021 unterstützt der i7-1185G7 offiziell vPro.
Eine weitere Neuerung ist die integrierte Intel Iris Xe G7 Grafikkarte (Gen 12) welche eine deutlich höhere Leistung wie die alte Iris Plus G7 in Ice Lake bieten soll. Im 1185G7 bietet die Iris Xe alle 96 EUs bei einem Takt von 400 - 1350 MHz.
Wie bisher wird auch weiterhin WLAN (Wifi 6) und nun auch Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 und 4 Lanes PCIe 4 im Chip (teil-)integriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks.
Der TDP kann bei den UP3 CPUs von 12 - 28 Watt gewählt werden (mit unterschiedlichem Basistakt) und dadurch eignet sich die CPU auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks.
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für Subnotebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn-3M Kern und bietet daher 3MB Level 2 Cache und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Er bietet alle Features des Penryn Kerns, wie Virtualisierung und Trusted Execution. Die Performance ist durch die geringe Taktrate begrenzt.
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der oberen Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der Prozessor ist gleich schnell wie der sparsamere Core 2 Duo P9500 (25 Watt TDP).
Die Performance des Core 2 Duo T9400 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.53 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo P9500 und dadurch sollte sie für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.
Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.
Model Intel Core i7-1185G7 Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 Series Intel Tiger Lake Intel Core 2 Duo Intel Core 2 Duo Codename Tiger Lake-UP3 Penryn Penryn Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn Clock 3000 - 4800 MHz 1400 MHz 2530 MHz L1 Cache 320 KB 128 KB 128 KB L2 Cache 5 MB 3 MB 6 MB L3 Cache 12 MB Cores / Threads 4 / 8 2 / 2 2 / 2 TDP 28 Watt 10 Watt 35 Watt 10 nm 45 nm, 1.05-1.15V 45 nm, 1.050V-1.162V max. Temp. 100 °C 105 °C 105 °C Socket BGA1449 BGA956 BGA479, PGA478 Features DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TME Enhanced Speedstep, VT, TXT Virtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit iGPU Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (400 - 1350 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com ark.intel.com FSB 800 1066 Transistors 410 Million 410 Million Die Size 107 mm2 107 mm2 $262 U.S. $316 U.S.
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1185G7
32.6 pt (54%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3610 avg: 5324 median: 5383.5 (5%) max: 6383 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W 89% 94% 60% 67% 83% 80% 82% 82% 89% 84% 92% 88% 100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1251 avg: 1449 median: 1455.5 (62%) max: 1532 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W 95% 97% 92% 89% 93% 92% 94% 94% 99% 100% 98% 96% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 489 avg: 557 median: 558.5 (62%) max: 593 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 96% 97% 92% 87% 92% 92% 93% 94% 98% 100% 90% 97% 98% 96% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1425 avg: 2039 median: 2090 (5%) max: 2493 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 88% 93% 58% 67% 82% 79% 73% 80% 84% 80% 91% 87% 100% 76% 92%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 617 avg: 859 median: 866 (5%) max: 1066 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 91% 91% 61% 75% 80% 78% 86% 81% 99% 89% 89% 87% 100% 78% 92%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 168 avg: 215.4 median: 217 (63%) max: 230 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 96% 99% 74% 92% 99% 93% 94% 92% 99% 100% 94% 97% 98% 97% 99%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 8.99 avg: 9.3 median: 9.3 (12%) max: 9.67 Points
0.8 Points (1%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.52 avg: 2.5 median: 2.5 (63%) max: 2.56 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8782 avg: 8872 median: 8872 (54%) max: 8962 Points
min: 1500 avg: 1594 median: 1595.5 (10%) max: 1794 Points
min: 2713 avg: 2848 median: 2818 (17%) max: 3207 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 26426 avg: 27025 median: 27024.5 (20%) max: 27623 Points
min: 2660 avg: 2894 median: 2879 (2%) max: 3253 Points
min: 5008 avg: 5341 median: 5267.5 (4%) max: 6173 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 35564 avg: 36392 median: 36391.5 (25%) max: 37219 Points
3266 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 10927 avg: 11135 median: 11135 (14%) max: 11343 Points
1707 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
240.4 s (3%)
min: 1784 avg: 2131 median: 1878 (22%) max: 3227 s
1641 s (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 5.71 avg: 6 median: 5.8 (1%) max: 6.875 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 56 W 100% 100%
min: 55 avg: 66.6 median: 59.3 (12%) max: 100 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 56 W 100% 110%
min: 30.1 avg: 37.7 median: 31 (6%) max: 52.1 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 56 W 100% 109%
6045 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 18812 avg: 23288 median: 23471 (13%) max: 27693 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 89% 97% 71% 76% 86% 82% 79% 79% 89% 86% 77% 90% 100% 79% 90%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3678 avg: 5112 median: 5153 (62%) max: 5507 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 94% 96% 93% 92% 96% 90% 92% 86% 94% 96% 100% 93% 98% 96% 91%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
46.6 fps (16%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
198.8 fps (46%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.02 avg: 6.6 median: 6.6 (12%) max: 8.13 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 85% 93% 63% 71% 85% 82% 71% 80% 80% 81% 88% 85% 100% 71% 88%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.8 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 1099 avg: 1103 median: 1102.5 (14%) max: 1106 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W 100% 100%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 478 avg: 588 median: 578.5 (4%) max: 745 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 101% 102% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 102% 101% 102%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.55 avg: 0.6 median: 0.6 (13%) max: 0.615 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 100% 101% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 100%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9108 Points (19%)
min: 1125 avg: 1196 median: 1197 (3%) max: 1271 Points
min: 2026 avg: 2262 median: 2304 (5%) max: 2349 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.1 s (2%)
min: 32 avg: 33.4 median: 33 (7%) max: 35.9 s
min: 17.75 avg: 18.1 median: 18.1 (4%) max: 18.55 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.6 s (1%)
min: 74 avg: 78.6 median: 78.5 (3%) max: 82.3 s
min: 42.53 avg: 43.1 median: 43 (2%) max: 44.02 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
380.4 s (2%)
min: 1790 avg: 1871 median: 1896.5 (8%) max: 1936 s
min: 1107 avg: 1150 median: 1164 (5%) max: 1180 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 11610 avg: 12619 median: 12820 (6%) max: 12931 MIPS
23652 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 8763 avg: 9718 median: 10109 (8%) max: 10270 MFLOPS
17818 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3097 avg: 3602 median: 3283.5 (7%) max: 4635 Points
min: 2293 avg: 5930 median: 6175 (13%) max: 7555 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4.6 Points (66%)
5.4 Points (77%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 4.3 avg: 4.5 median: 4.5 (58%) max: 4.7 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
29182 Points (26%)
2757 Points (2%)
min: 3066 avg: 4502 median: 4892 (4%) max: 5156 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5707 avg: 10641 median: 11284 (31%) max: 12726 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W 79% 98% 45% 71% 89% 82% 94% 76% 100% 97% 98% 92% 92% 90%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 69716 avg: 71020 median: 71351 (58%) max: 71993 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 64 W 98% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 69895 avg: 70538 median: 70537.5 (57%) max: 71180 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 67339 avg: 69256 median: 69331.5 (58%) max: 71022 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W 100% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5114 avg: 8442 median: 8804 (22%) max: 10133 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 64 W 80% 92% 50% 71% 87% 87% 90% 78% 100% 98% 83% 89% 92% 97%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 7886 avg: 13151 median: 13684 (24%) max: 14680 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 92% 97% 54% 77% 93% 90% 92% 85% 100% 99% 98% 92% 96% 100% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2489 avg: 4447 median: 4495 (19%) max: 5608 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 85% 84% 46% 73% 82% 84% 74% 82% 100% 86% 95% 82% 97% 91% 97%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1398 avg: 1520 median: 1529 (61%) max: 1626 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 94% 93% 90% 90% 93% 92% 95% 95% 100% 92% 97% 100% 86%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4620 avg: 5460 median: 5550 (10%) max: 5944 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 96% 90% 89% 85% 95% 87% 98% 97% 97% 95% 92% 100% 95%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1217 avg: 1485 median: 1531.5 (7%) max: 1561 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 28 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W 91% 99% 95% 98% 100%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4542 avg: 5511 median: 5578.5 (18%) max: 6349 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 28 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W 100% 88% 86% 92% 91%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5587 avg: 6340 median: 6437 (64%) max: 6682 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 28 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W 92% 98% 96% 93% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 20763 avg: 22357 median: 22175 (24%) max: 25403 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 28 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W 100% 89% 96% 92% 91%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 618 avg: 649 median: 645 (1%) max: 695 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 59942 avg: 62365 median: 61608 (54%) max: 66300 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W 92% 90% 100% 93%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 189.4 avg: 189.9 median: 189.9 (55%) max: 190.4 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 28 W 100% 99%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 230 avg: 251.2 median: 253 (53%) max: 270 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 27 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 36 W TDP 55 W TDP 56 W TDP 64 W 92% 95% 95% 95% 93% 94% 90% 90% 93% 94% 100% 94% 94% 95% 89%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1233 avg: 1343 median: 1325 (51%) max: 1474 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 26 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W 100% 84% 89% 95%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 26.9 avg: 43.8 median: 44.6 (8%) max: 59.4 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 36 W 102% 103% 106% 105% 103% 101% 103% 101% 101% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 33.7 avg: 48.1 median: 46.9 (9%) max: 68.3 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 36 W 103% 103% 107% 106% 105% 103% 104% 102% 100% 105%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.6 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.1 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.3 avg: 17.3 median: 17.5 (13%) max: 21.1 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 15 W TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 26 W TDP 28 W TDP 29 W TDP 30 W TDP 36 W 84% 93% 100% 92% 76% 80% 85% 62% 100%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1185G7 → 100% n=9 Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 → 15% n=9 Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 → 26% n=9
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 12. 22:24:51
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 12248 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 424 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 393 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728764688s time from redirect:3 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10 Oct 2024 05:17:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12248 +0.001s ... 0.005s
#9 got single benchmarks 12248 +0.004s ... 0.009s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 424 +0s ... 0.009s
#11 got single benchmarks 424 +0.001s ... 0.01s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 393 +0s ... 0.011s
#13 got single benchmarks 393 +0.003s ... 0.013s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.042s
#16 return log +0s ... 0.042s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte