Intel Core i7-10870H vs Intel Core i9-11900H vs Intel Core i7-10875H
Intel Core i7-10870H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i7-10870H ist ein Achtkern-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur basiert (CML-H, 4. Generation der Skylake Architektur). Er taktet die acht Prozessorkerne mit 2, - 5 GHz (4,2 bei allen 8 Kernen, 4,8 Boost ohne Thermal Velocity). Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down). Im Vergleich zum schnelleren Core i7-10875H , bietet der i7-10870H 100 MHz geringere Taktfrequenzen der CPU-Kerne.
Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.
Der i7-10875H unterstützt die Businessfeatures vPro, TXT und SIPP.
Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i7-10875H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks. Optional kann er per Configurable TDP-down auf 35 Watt gedrosselt werden (mit dadurch geringerer Leistung).
Intel Core i9-11900H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-11900H ist ein Octa-Core-Prozessor für Gaming-Notebooks und Workstations. Er basiert auf die Tiger-Lake-Architektur (H45) und wurde im 2. Quartal 2021 präsentiert. Der Chip bietet einen TDP von 45 Watt (konfigurierbar). Die Prozessorkerne können von 2,5 bis 4,9 GHz (Einzelkern-Turbo) takten. Alle Kerne gemeinsam können maximal 4,4 GHz erreichen. Der Prozessor bietet 24 MB Level 3 Cache und unterstützt DDR4-3200 Speicher. Die integrierte Grafik basiert auf die Xe-Architektur und ist UHD Graphics benannt (32 EUs). Im 11900H taktet sie von 350 - 1450 MHz. Der Chip wird im neuen 10nm SuperFin Prozess gefertigt.
Dank der neuen Tiger Lake Architektur sollte die Leistung oberhalb des Vorgängers, dem Intel Core i9-10885H (Comet Lake-H, 2,4 - 5,3 GHz, 16 MB L3) liegen (Einzel- und Mehrkernperformance). Damit sollte die Performance vergleichbar sein mit einem aktuellem Ryzen 9 5800H (Zen 3, 3,2 - 4,4 GHz, 16 MB L3).
Wie bei den kleineren Tiger-Lake-Chips wird auch hier WLAN (Wifi 6E) und Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 im Chip (teil-)integriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks. Weiters bietet der i9-11900H 20 PCIe 4.0 Lanes.
Der TDP ist bei 2,5 GHz Basistakt mit 45 Watt spezifiziert und kann auf 35 Watt und dadurch 2,1 GHz verringert werden (cTDP). Dadurch eignet sich die CPU am besten für große und schwere Notebooks.
Intel Core i7-10875H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i7-10875H ist ein Achtkern-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur basiert (CML-H, 4. Generation der Skylake Architektur). Er taktet die acht Prozessorkerne mit 2,3 - 5,1 GHz (4,3 bei allen 8 Kernen, 4,9 Boost ohne Thermal Velocity). Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down). Im Vergleich zum schnelleren Core i9-10885H , bietet der i7-10875H etwas geringere Taktraten.
Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.
Der i7-10875H unterstützt die Businessfeatures vPro, TXT und SIPP.
Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i7-10875H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks. Optional kann er per Configurable TDP-down auf 35 Watt gedrosselt werden (mit dadurch geringerer Leistung).
Model Intel Core i7-10870H Intel Core i9-11900H Intel Core i7-10875H Series Intel Comet Lake Intel Tiger Lake Intel Comet Lake Codename Comet Lake-H Tiger Lake-H Comet Lake-H Serie: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H Clock 2200 - 5000 MHz 2500 - 4900 MHz 2300 - 5100 MHz L1 Cache 512 KB 640 KB 512 KB L2 Cache 2 MB 10 MB 2 MB L3 Cache 16 MB 24 MB 16 MB Cores / Threads 8 / 16 8 / 16 8 / 16 TDP 45 Watt 45 Watt 45 Watt Technology 14 nm 10 nm 14 nm max. Temp. 100 °C 100 °C 100 °C Socket BGA1440 BGA1787 FCBGA1440 Features DDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (350 - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com ark.intel.com $450 U.S.
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10870H
32.2 pt (53%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-11900H
36.5 pt (61%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10875H
32.3 pt (54%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8250 avg: 9594 median: 9892.5 (9%) max: 10450 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 95% 97% 98% 82% 93% 97% 83% 96% 100%
min: 11135 avg: 12109 median: 12143.5 (11%) max: 13012 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 83% 93% 85% 86% 72% 82% 85% 73% 97% 100% 88%
min: 5135 avg: 8108 median: 8889.5 (8%) max: 9809 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 73% 93% 85% 86% 73% 72% 85% 73% 97% 100% 88%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1177 avg: 1223 median: 1226 (52%) max: 1253 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 98% 97% 98% 97% 98% 99% 97% 100% 97%
min: 1574 avg: 1585 median: 1580.5 (67%) max: 1605 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 77% 100% 76% 76% 75% 77% 77% 75% 98% 92% 76%
min: 1100 avg: 1222 median: 1241.5 (53%) max: 1270 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 75% 100% 76% 76% 76% 77% 77% 75% 98% 92% 76%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 460 avg: 473.6 median: 473.5 (52%) max: 484 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 99% 97% 98% 97% 98% 98% 97% 100% 98%
min: 600 avg: 607 median: 608 (67%) max: 615 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 78% 98% 100% 76% 77% 76% 77% 77% 77% 98% 92% 77%
min: 430 avg: 485.9 median: 483.5 (54%) max: 524 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 80% 100% 91% 81% 78% 78% 80% 79% 78% 100% 94% 79%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3027 avg: 3588 median: 3632 (9%) max: 4020 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 93% 85% 93% 80% 94% 95% 83% 97% 100%
min: 4324 avg: 4758 median: 4878 (12%) max: 5160 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 72% 100% 84% 66% 72% 62% 73% 74% 65% 85% 89% 78%
min: 1986 avg: 3455 median: 3391.5 (8%) max: 4176 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 68% 100% 74% 65% 72% 63% 64% 74% 65% 85% 89% 78%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1336 avg: 1614 median: 1659 (10%) max: 1740 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 98% 100% 100% 86% 95% 92% 85% 93% 99% 97%
min: 1770 avg: 2068 median: 2148 (14%) max: 2211 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 77% 100% 80% 78% 78% 67% 74% 72% 67% 92% 90% 78% 76%
min: 1003 avg: 1554 median: 1594.5 (10%) max: 1833 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 71% 100% 74% 72% 78% 69% 65% 72% 67% 92% 90% 78% 76%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 196 avg: 199.8 median: 200 (56%) max: 204 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 98% 100% 99% 99% 98% 98% 99% 97%
min: 236 avg: 239.8 median: 241 (68%) max: 243 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 82% 97% 100% 84% 82% 82% 82% 82% 99% 93% 81%
min: 190 avg: 203.6 median: 202 (57%) max: 220 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 84% 98% 94% 86% 83% 84% 83% 83% 100% 94% 81%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.7 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7803 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
44805 Points (32%)
7473 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 39581 avg: 44452 median: 44975.5 (26%) max: 46708 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 97% 97% 100% 90% 95% 96% 95% 100% 99%
min: 49486 avg: 52910 median: 53205 (31%) max: 57263 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 83% 100% 91% 83% 86% 77% 82% 83% 81% 93% 97% 85%
min: 29844 avg: 43117 median: 44947 (26%) max: 49562 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 80% 100% 85% 83% 86% 79% 78% 83% 81% 93% 97% 85%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5145 avg: 5293 median: 5295.5 (63%) max: 5429 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 98% 97% 97% 98% 98% 95% 98% 100% 96%
min: 5582 avg: 5781 median: 5795 (69%) max: 6018 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 88% 93% 100% 87% 87% 89% 88% 85% 88% 98% 93% 87%
min: 5071 avg: 5360 median: 5319 (64%) max: 5780 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 90% 95% 100% 92% 89% 91% 90% 87% 90% 100% 95% 88%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
103 fps (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
242.4 fps (56%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.7 avg: 12.2 median: 12.5 (22%) max: 13.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 92% 85% 96% 84% 93% 93% 86% 98% 100%
min: 13.6 avg: 15 median: 15 (26%) max: 16.7 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 83% 100% 91% 77% 86% 76% 84% 83% 77% 99% 100% 90%
min: 7.27 avg: 11.7 median: 12.1 (21%) max: 14.1 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 79% 100% 82% 78% 86% 77% 77% 83% 77% 99% 100% 90%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.3 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
479 Seconds (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 272 avg: 297.6 median: 292 (2%) max: 333 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 231 avg: 247 median: 243 (2%) max: 270 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 101% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%
min: 258.6 avg: 327 median: 322.5 (2%) max: 535 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 101% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 101% 101% 100%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.573 avg: 0.6 median: 0.6 (13%) max: 0.614 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 101% 100% 101% 101% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101%
min: 0.52 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (11%) max: 0.544 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 101% 102% 102% 100% 101% 101% 100% 100% 101% 102% 102% 101%
min: 0.546 avg: 0.6 median: 0.6 (13%) max: 0.662 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 101% 102% 102% 101% 101% 101% 101% 100% 101% 102% 102% 101%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12228 avg: 12945 median: 12944.5 (28%) max: 13661 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
431.7 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 55236 avg: 55318 median: 55317.5 (42%) max: 55399 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13753 avg: 15226 median: 15943 (42%) max: 16331 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 94% 97% 98% 90% 98% 98% 100% 84% 86%
min: 14467 avg: 17623 median: 18686 (49%) max: 19231 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 82% 100% 77% 85% 86% 79% 86% 86% 88% 98% 74% 75%
min: 11778 avg: 16439 median: 16622 (43%) max: 18773 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 87% 100% 84% 87% 86% 82% 86% 86% 88% 98% 74% 75%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63367 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 63612 avg: 64430 median: 63696 (53%) max: 65981 Points
CPU TDP 58 W TDP 60 W 98% 100%
min: 60620 avg: 65215 median: 65828 (55%) max: 67661 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W 96% 100% 99% 95% 96% 98%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12985 avg: 14960 median: 15506 (39%) max: 15719 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 97% 99% 99% 89% 96% 100% 100%
min: 13550 avg: 15637 median: 16364 (41%) max: 17649 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 86% 100% 78% 88% 88% 79% 86% 77% 92% 89%
min: 8202 avg: 14143 median: 15133 (38%) max: 16966 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 80% 100% 82% 85% 88% 79% 81% 77% 92% 89%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17337 avg: 19768 median: 20247 (36%) max: 20886 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 93% 100% 99% 88% 98% 96% 93% 100% 100% 94%
min: 21513 avg: 24434 median: 24867 (44%) max: 26502 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 78% 100% 86% 83% 82% 73% 81% 80% 77% 99% 95% 83% 78%
min: 15535 avg: 20404 median: 21228 (38%) max: 22530 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 81% 100% 83% 80% 82% 76% 77% 80% 77% 99% 95% 83% 78%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7603 avg: 8624 median: 8636.5 (36%) max: 9627 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 86% 96% 95% 86% 96% 88% 86% 96% 100% 81%
min: 9050 avg: 9865 median: 9631.5 (41%) max: 11145 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 82% 100% 91% 90% 82% 91% 83% 82% 90% 97% 95% 77%
min: 5192 avg: 8699 median: 8946 (38%) max: 10140 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 85% 100% 87% 88% 90% 86% 88% 83% 82% 90% 97% 95% 77%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
2355 Points (62%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
9401 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1191 avg: 1273 median: 1282.5 (50%) max: 1295 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 99% 96% 99% 98% 98% 100% 98%
min: 1576 avg: 1634 median: 1632 (64%) max: 1692 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 76% 96% 100% 76% 76% 74% 76% 75% 75% 93% 90% 75%
min: 1233 avg: 1304 median: 1300 (51%) max: 1371 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 80% 100% 94% 81% 79% 78% 80% 78% 78% 97% 94% 78%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6403 avg: 7482 median: 7735.5 (14%) max: 7882 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 98% 98% 98% 88% 98% 96% 89% 100% 98%
min: 7725 avg: 9140 median: 9628 (17%) max: 9856 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 80% 100% 91% 80% 80% 72% 80% 79% 73% 80% 94% 80%
min: 5715 avg: 7734 median: 7799 (14%) max: 8620 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 80% 100% 86% 78% 80% 75% 78% 79% 73% 80% 94% 80%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1264 avg: 1272 median: 1276 (6%) max: 1277 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 99%
min: 1188 avg: 1255 median: 1264 (5%) max: 1306 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 96% 100% 99% 98%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7678 avg: 7738 median: 7700 (24%) max: 7837 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 98% 100% 98%
min: 6700 avg: 7399 median: 7370 (23%) max: 8130 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 91% 100% 99% 97%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5311 avg: 5555 median: 5652 (56%) max: 5703 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 99% 93% 100%
min: 5616 avg: 5830 median: 5803 (58%) max: 6016 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 98% 91% 98%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30420 avg: 30536 median: 30578 (30%) max: 30611 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 99%
min: 28711 avg: 30765 median: 31346 (31%) max: 31934 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 97% 100% 98% 97%
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
6013 Points (82%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
30783 Points (75%)
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
min: 19061 avg: 19077 median: 19077 (100%) max: 19093 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 789 avg: 801 median: 796.5 (1%) max: 861 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 603 avg: 606 median: 606 (1%) max: 608 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 746 avg: 765 median: 757 (1%) max: 848 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 53412 avg: 54494 median: 54493.5 (47%) max: 55575 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 70 W 96% 100%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
227 Points (64%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 220 avg: 226.4 median: 225 (47%) max: 243 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 93% 91% 100% 93% 95% 91% 93% 93% 91%
min: 272 avg: 275.2 median: 273 (57%) max: 286 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 79% 95% 100% 77% 85% 79% 81% 78% 79% 95% 90% 77%
min: 212 avg: 238.5 median: 239 (50%) max: 262 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 87% 100% 98% 83% 89% 85% 87% 81% 82% 100% 94% 81%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1632 Points (63%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 98.4 avg: 98.9 median: 98.9 (17%) max: 99.4 Watt
min: 88.9 avg: 110.4 median: 116 (20%) max: 122 Watt
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 100% 107% 104% 103% 100%
min: 69 avg: 98.9 median: 104.8 (18%) max: 117 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 106% 100% 106% 103% 103% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 98.6 avg: 98.8 median: 98.8 (18%) max: 98.9 Watt
min: 89.3 avg: 137.7 median: 152 (28%) max: 159 Watt
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 100% 118% 115% 102% 104%
min: 71 avg: 110.8 median: 117 (21%) max: 138 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 114% 100% 116% 113% 102% 104%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
17.3 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 13.5 avg: 13.8 median: 13.8 (10%) max: 14 Points per Watt
min: 13.3 avg: 14.4 median: 14.1 (10%) max: 16 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 30 W TDP 60 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 92% 91% 88% 100%
min: 13.2 avg: 14 median: 13.6 (10%) max: 15.6 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 95% 92% 91% 90% 88% 100%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10870H → 100% n=19 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-11900H → 121% n=19 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10875H → 100% n=19
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 01. 12:27:13
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 12757 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 13143 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 11949 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1730460432s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Nov 2024 05:17:03 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12757 +0.002s ... 0.007s
#9 got single benchmarks 12757 +0.003s ... 0.01s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13143 +0.004s ... 0.015s
#11 got single benchmarks 13143 +0.011s ... 0.026s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11949 +0.004s ... 0.03s
#13 got single benchmarks 11949 +0.042s ... 0.072s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.128s
#16 return log +0s ... 0.128s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte