Intel Core i7-10870H vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900H vs Intel Core i9-10885H
Intel Core i7-10870H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i7-10870H ist ein Achtkern-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur basiert (CML-H, 4. Generation der Skylake Architektur). Er taktet die acht Prozessorkerne mit 2, - 5 GHz (4,2 bei allen 8 Kernen, 4,8 Boost ohne Thermal Velocity). Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down). Im Vergleich zum schnelleren Core i7-10875H , bietet der i7-10870H 100 MHz geringere Taktfrequenzen der CPU-Kerne.
Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.
Der i7-10875H unterstützt die Businessfeatures vPro, TXT und SIPP.
Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i7-10875H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks. Optional kann er per Configurable TDP-down auf 35 Watt gedrosselt werden (mit dadurch geringerer Leistung).
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H ► remove from comparison
Der AMD Ryzen 9 4900H ist ein Mobilprozessor für große Notebooks (z.B. Gaming-Laptops) basierend auf die Renoir Generation. Der SoC beinhaltet acht Zen 2 Kerne (Octa-Core CPU) welche mit bis zu 3,3 - 4,4 GHz getaktet werden (Turbo) und SMT / Hyperthreading (16 Threads) unterstützen. Der Chip wird im modernen 7nm Prozess bei TSMC gefertigt und soll laut AMD eine 2x verbesserte Performance pro Watt bieten als die Ryzen 3000 APUs (z.B. den Ryzen 7 3750H Vorgänger).
Im Vergleich zum Ryzen 7 4800H , bietet der Ryzen 9 4900H eine 200 MHz (+5%) höhere Turbo-Taktfrequenz und 400 MHz mehr Basistakt. Nach ersten Informationen ist der Geschwindigkeitszuwachs in Notebooks im Vergleich zum 4800H jedoch relativ gering. Hier limitiert wahrscheinlich bereits TDP und die Kühllösung. Im Vergleich zu Intels Mobilprozessoren, sollte der Ryzen 9 4900H sich in vergleichbaren Performanceregionen wie der 9980HK einordnen.
Der SoC integriert neben den acht Prozessorkernen noch eine Radeon RX Vega 8 Grafikkarte mit 8 CUs, einen Dual-Channel DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4-4266 Speicherkontroller und 12 MB Level 3 Cache. Detaillierte Informationen zu den Renoir APUs finden Sie hier auf unserer Architekturseite .
Der TDP der H-Modelle ist mit 45 Watt spezifiziert und damit 10 Watt höher als die HS-Modelle (siehe Ryzen 9 4900HS). Daher ist der Chip für große und schwere Notebooks vorgesehen und benötigt, trotz des effizienten 7nm Herstellungsprozesses, eine gute Kühlung um die Leistung auch dauerhaft zu erbringen.
Intel Core i9-10885H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-10885H ist ein Achtkern-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur basiert (CML-H, 4. Generation der Skylake Architektur). Er taktet die acht Prozessorkerne mit 2,4 GHz bis 5,3 GHz oder höher (Ein- und Zweikern Turbo, bis jetzt nicht bestätigt). Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down).
Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.
Der i9-10885H unterstützt die Businessfeatures vPro , TXT und SIPP.
Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i9-10885H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks. Optional kann er per Configurable TDP-down auf 35 Watt gedrosselt werden (mit dadurch geringerer Leistung).
Model Intel Core i7-10870H AMD Ryzen 9 4900H Intel Core i9-10885H Series Intel Comet Lake AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Intel Comet Lake Codename Comet Lake-H Renoir-H (Zen 2) Comet Lake-H Serie: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H Clock 2200 - 5000 MHz 3300 - 4400 MHz 2400 - 5300 MHz L1 Cache 512 KB 512 KB 512 KB L2 Cache 2 MB 4 MB 2 MB L3 Cache 16 MB 8 MB 16 MB Cores / Threads 8 / 16 8 / 16 8 / 16 TDP 45 Watt 45 Watt 45 Watt Technology 14 nm 7 nm 14 nm max. Temp. 100 °C 105 °C 100 °C Socket BGA1440 FP6 FCBGA1440 Features DDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX DDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA, SHA Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com www.amd.com ark.intel.com $556 U.S.
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10870H
32.2 pt (53%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 4900H
31.9 pt (53%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10885H
33 pt (55%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8250 avg: 9594 median: 9892.5 (9%) max: 10450 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 95% 97% 98% 82% 93% 97% 83% 96% 100%
min: 11416 avg: 11604 median: 11604 (11%) max: 11792 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 88% 100% 86% 87% 73% 83% 86% 74% 85% 89%
min: 8802 avg: 9438 median: 9438 (9%) max: 10074 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 88% 100% 86% 87% 73% 83% 86% 75% 74% 85% 89%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1177 avg: 1223 median: 1226 (52%) max: 1253 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 98% 97% 98% 97% 98% 99% 97% 100% 97%
min: 1290 avg: 1294 median: 1294 (55%) max: 1298 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 96% 100% 94% 94% 93% 95% 95% 93% 97% 94%
min: 1284 avg: 1290 median: 1289.5 (55%) max: 1295 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 96% 100% 94% 94% 93% 95% 97% 99% 93% 97% 94%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 460 avg: 473.6 median: 473.5 (52%) max: 484 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 99% 97% 98% 97% 98% 98% 97% 100% 98%
min: 482 avg: 493.5 median: 493.5 (55%) max: 505 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 95% 100% 93% 94% 93% 94% 94% 93% 96% 94%
min: 460 avg: 487.3 median: 489 (54%) max: 513 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 94% 100% 93% 94% 93% 94% 98% 97% 93% 96% 94%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3027 avg: 3588 median: 3632 (9%) max: 4020 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 93% 85% 93% 80% 94% 95% 83% 97% 100%
min: 4233 avg: 4409 median: 4409 (11%) max: 4585 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 85% 100% 74% 81% 70% 82% 83% 73% 85% 88%
min: 2798 avg: 3400 median: 3639 (9%) max: 3762 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 79% 100% 74% 81% 70% 82% 83% 79% 73% 85% 88%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1336 avg: 1614 median: 1659 (10%) max: 1740 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 98% 100% 100% 86% 95% 92% 85% 93% 99% 97%
min: 1886 avg: 1927 median: 1926.5 (12%) max: 1967 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 89% 100% 87% 88% 76% 83% 81% 75% 82% 87% 85%
min: 1264 avg: 1502 median: 1517 (10%) max: 1726 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 83% 100% 87% 88% 76% 83% 83% 77% 75% 82% 87% 85%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 196 avg: 199.8 median: 200 (56%) max: 204 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 98% 100% 99% 99% 98% 98% 99% 97%
min: 192 avg: 193 median: 193 (54%) max: 194 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 97% 96% 100% 99% 99% 98% 98% 99% 97%
min: 197 avg: 206.7 median: 211 (59%) max: 212 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 93% 92% 96% 95% 95% 94% 97% 100% 95% 93%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
23 Points (30%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5946 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
40253 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
65380 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10173 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
82.9 s (1%)
131.2 s (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 100% 101%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.2 s (1%)
3.9 s (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 100% 100%
4297 Points (7%)
6420 Points (10%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 100% 67%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 39581 avg: 44452 median: 44975.5 (26%) max: 46708 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 97% 97% 100% 90% 95% 96% 95% 100% 99%
48976 MIPS (28%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 92% 100% 92% 95% 86% 90% 91% 90% 95% 94%
min: 36740 avg: 40519 median: 41823 (24%) max: 42993 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 86% 100% 92% 95% 86% 90% 90% 85% 90% 95% 94%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5145 avg: 5293 median: 5295.5 (63%) max: 5429 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 98% 97% 97% 98% 98% 95% 98% 100% 96%
4727 MIPS (57%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 98% 87% 97% 97% 98% 98% 95% 98% 100% 96%
min: 5397 avg: 5551 median: 5589 (67%) max: 5668 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 96% 85% 94% 94% 95% 95% 97% 100% 95% 97% 93%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
111 fps (37%)
80.5 fps (27%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 73% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
215 fps (50%)
217.8 fps (50%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 100% 99%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.7 avg: 12.2 median: 12.5 (22%) max: 13.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 92% 85% 96% 84% 93% 93% 86% 98% 100%
12.9 fps (23%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 92% 96% 85% 96% 84% 93% 93% 86% 98% 100%
min: 10.6 avg: 11.5 median: 11.3 (20%) max: 12.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 88% 96% 85% 96% 84% 93% 93% 84% 86% 98% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
1 GB/s (29%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 83% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 90% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.4 GB/s (19%)
9.9 GB/s (26%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 100% 75%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 272 avg: 297.6 median: 292 (2%) max: 333 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
247.3 Seconds (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 283 avg: 311 median: 302 (2%) max: 348 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.573 avg: 0.6 median: 0.6 (13%) max: 0.614 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 101% 100% 101% 101% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101%
0.6 sec (12%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 101% 101% 100% 101% 101% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101%
min: 0.564 avg: 0.6 median: 0.6 (12%) max: 0.572 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 101% 101% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 101% 100%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12101 Points (26%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.5 s (2%)
7.3 s (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.1 s (1%)
16.3 s (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
729 s (3%)
433.9 s (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 101% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
64532 Points (50%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13753 avg: 15226 median: 15943 (42%) max: 16331 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 94% 97% 98% 90% 98% 98% 100% 84% 86%
12199 Points (32%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 94% 75% 97% 98% 90% 98% 98% 100% 84% 86%
min: 12279 avg: 14604 median: 14291 (37%) max: 17242 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 98% 75% 97% 98% 90% 98% 93% 75% 100% 84% 86%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63266 Points (51%)
31296 Points (25%)
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 74 W 100% 49%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
63416 Points (51%)
30997 Points (25%)
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 74 W 100% 49%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 63612 avg: 64430 median: 63696 (53%) max: 65981 Points
CPU TDP 58 W TDP 60 W 98% 100%
69343 Points (58%)
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W 100% 92% 94%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12985 avg: 14960 median: 15506 (39%) max: 15719 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 97% 99% 99% 89% 96% 100% 100%
15719 Points (40%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 97% 100% 99% 99% 89% 96% 100% 100%
min: 11176 avg: 12814 median: 12814 (32%) max: 14452 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 74 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 94% 100% 99% 99% 89% 96% 71% 100% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17337 avg: 19768 median: 20247 (36%) max: 20886 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 93% 100% 99% 88% 98% 96% 93% 100% 100% 94%
20613 Points (37%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 93% 99% 100% 99% 88% 98% 96% 93% 100% 100% 94%
min: 17249 avg: 19483 median: 20594 (37%) max: 20606 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 95% 99% 100% 99% 88% 98% 97% 83% 93% 100% 100% 94%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7603 avg: 8624 median: 8636.5 (36%) max: 9627 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 86% 96% 95% 86% 96% 88% 86% 96% 100% 81%
6523 Points (27%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 86% 68% 96% 95% 86% 96% 88% 86% 96% 100% 81%
min: 6510 avg: 7798 median: 8203 (35%) max: 8682 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W TDP 120 W 87% 68% 96% 95% 86% 96% 87% 68% 86% 96% 100% 81%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1191 avg: 1273 median: 1282.5 (50%) max: 1295 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 99% 96% 99% 98% 98% 100% 98%
min: 1230 avg: 1232 median: 1231.5 (48%) max: 1233 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 98% 95% 100% 99% 96% 99% 98% 98% 100% 98%
min: 1216 avg: 1303 median: 1317 (51%) max: 1376 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 95% 93% 98% 97% 94% 97% 100% 99% 96% 98% 96%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6403 avg: 7482 median: 7735.5 (14%) max: 7882 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 98% 98% 98% 88% 98% 96% 89% 100% 98%
min: 7224 avg: 8012 median: 8012 (14%) max: 8800 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 89% 96% 96% 86% 96% 94% 87% 97% 96%
min: 6529 avg: 7045 median: 6914 (12%) max: 7693 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 99% 92% 98% 98% 88% 98% 97% 83% 89% 100% 98%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1264 avg: 1272 median: 1276 (6%) max: 1277 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 99%
1237 Points (5%)
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 97% 100% 100% 99%
min: 1234 avg: 1281 median: 1280.5 (6%) max: 1327 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 65 W TDP 74 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 93% 93% 96% 100% 96% 95%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7678 avg: 7738 median: 7700 (24%) max: 7837 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 98% 100% 98%
7624 Points (24%)
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 97% 98% 100% 98%
min: 6598 avg: 7172 median: 7172 (23%) max: 7746 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 65 W TDP 74 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 99% 97% 98% 84% 100% 98%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5311 avg: 5555 median: 5652 (56%) max: 5703 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 99% 93% 100%
5287 Points (53%)
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 93% 99% 93% 100%
min: 5672 avg: 5676 median: 5675.5 (57%) max: 5679 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 65 W TDP 74 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 99% 93% 99% 100% 93% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30420 avg: 30536 median: 30578 (30%) max: 30611 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 99%
28402 Points (28%)
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 93% 100% 100% 99%
min: 26114 avg: 29009 median: 29009 (29%) max: 31904 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 65 W TDP 74 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 89% 96% 82% 96% 95%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 789 avg: 801 median: 796.5 (1%) max: 861 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
767 ms (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 730 avg: 738 median: 734 (1%) max: 749 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 53412 avg: 54494 median: 54493.5 (47%) max: 55575 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 70 W 96% 100%
58398 Points (50%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 70 W 94% 100%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 220 avg: 226.4 median: 225 (47%) max: 243 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 93% 91% 100% 93% 95% 91% 93% 93% 91%
227 Points (47%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 93% 93% 91% 100% 93% 95% 91% 93% 93% 91%
min: 233 avg: 234.3 median: 234 (49%) max: 236 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 55 W TDP 58 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W TDP 75 W TDP 90 W TDP 95 W 95% 93% 91% 100% 93% 95% 94% 96% 93% 93% 91%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 98.4 avg: 98.9 median: 98.9 (17%) max: 99.4 Watt
73.2 Watt (13%)
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 105% 100%
min: 78.1 avg: 103.7 median: 116.4 (20%) max: 116.6 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W 108% 109% 104% 100% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 98.6 avg: 98.8 median: 98.8 (18%) max: 98.9 Watt
105.3 Watt (19%)
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 100% 101%
min: 125.2 avg: 131.2 median: 126 (23%) max: 142.4 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W 104% 109% 111% 104% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 13.5 avg: 13.8 median: 13.8 (10%) max: 14 Points per Watt
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 100% 74%
min: 10.1 avg: 11.5 median: 10.7 (8%) max: 13.7 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W TDP 70 W TDP 74 W 54% 100% 74% 73% 57%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10870H → 100% n=23 Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 4900H → 101% n=23 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10885H → 98% n=23
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 05. 11:43:16
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 12757 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11929 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 11962 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1730803396s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Nov 2024 05:17:58 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12757 +0.004s ... 0.011s
#9 got single benchmarks 12757 +0.018s ... 0.029s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11929 +0.004s ... 0.033s
#11 got single benchmarks 11929 +0.005s ... 0.038s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11962 +0.004s ... 0.042s
#13 got single benchmarks 11962 +0.008s ... 0.049s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.057s ... 0.107s
#16 return log +0s ... 0.107s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte