Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-8365U vs Intel Celeron N5095A

Intel Core i5-8365U

Der Intel Core i5-8365U ist ein sparsamer Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Whiskey-Lake-Architektur basiert und im Q2 2019 als einer von zwei vPro-CPUs der WHL-U Serie vorgestellt wurde. Im Vergleich zur Kaby-Lake-Refresh Generation, gibt es bei Whiskey-Lake anscheinend keine Unterschiede bis auf den verbesserten 14nm Prozess (14nm++ versus 14nm+). Verglichen mit dem Kaby-Lake-R Core i5-8250U, bietet der i5-8365U einen deutlich höheren Turbo-Boost-Takt. 4,1 GHz versus 3,4 GHz mit einem einzelnen Kern. Ausserdem nutzt Whiskey Lake einen neuen PCH in 14nm mit USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) und CNVi WLAN/Bluetooth. Verglichen mit dem Vorgänger Core i5-8265U (ebenfalls Whiskey Lake), wurde der Turbo um 200 MHz erhöht.

Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört weiterhin auf den Namen Intel UHD Graphics 620, unterscheidet sich jedoch nicht von der Intel HD Graphics 620. Im Core i7-8565U taktet sie von 300 - 1100 MHz. Weiters bietet die CPU noch einen integrierten DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller sowie VP9- und H.265-Videode- und -encoder.

Architektur

Whiskey-Lake nutzt die selbe Architektur wie Kaby-Lake, welche wiederum sehr ähnlich zur Skylake Architektur ist. Dadurch hat sich die Pro-MHz-Leistung kaum verändert. Nur der gereifte 14nm Prozess verhilft zur schnelleren Taktraten und effizienterer Performance.

Performance

Die Leistung des i5-8365U hängt stark vom konfigurierten TDP, wie lange der Boost laufen darf und von der Kühlung ab. Dadurch kann es zu einer hohen Schwankungsbreite kommen. Bereits beim i7-8550U gab es sehr große Leistungsunterschiede, vor allem bei längerer Last. Durch den höheren Turbo Boost, sollte die Single Thread Performance (je nach Kühlung) im Vergleich zum Core i5-8265U etwas zunehmen.

Grafikeinheit

Die integrierte Intel UHD Graphics 620 ist laut Intel identisch zur Intel HD Graphics 620 (z.B. im Core i5-7200U). Sie verfügt wie die alte HD Graphics 520 über 24 Ausführungseinheiten (EUs). Die Performance hängt stark vom verwendeten Arbeitsspeicher ab; mit schnellem DDR4-2133 im Dual-Channel-Betrieb kann sie sich mit einer dedizerten Nvidia GeForce 920M messen.

Anders als Skylake kann Kaby Lake und Whiskey Lake nun auch H.265/HEVC im Main10-Profil mit 10 Bit Farbtiefe sowie Googles VP9-Codec in Hardware decodieren.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Fertigung erfolgt erneut verbesserten 14-Nanometer-Prozess (14nm++) mit FinFET-Transistoren. Der TDP ist weiterhin ULV-typisch mit 15 Watt spezifiziert und kann je nach Einsatzzweck zwischen 7,5 und 25 Watt variiert werden.

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Core i5-8365UIntel Celeron N5095A
CodenameWhiskey Lake-UJasper Lake
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Jasper Lake
Serie: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Core i5-8365U « 1.6 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8265U compare1.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1600 - 4100 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1528BGA1338
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8365U
27.3 pt (45%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 419     avg: 421.3     median: 421 (47%)     max: 424 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1373     avg: 1404     median: 1408 (3%)     max: 1430 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 558     avg: 584     median: 579 (4%)     max: 620 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 163     avg: 166.5     median: 166 (47%)     max: 171 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.7 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.9 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6557 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
16518 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
296.7 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.7 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3173 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 16711     avg: 17312     median: 17293 (10%)     max: 17932 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3958     avg: 4261     median: 4346 (51%)     max: 4478 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
35.9 fps (12%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
153 fps (35%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.3     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 4.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.6 GB/s (12%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 791     avg: 824     median: 825 (6%)     max: 855 Seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6330 Points (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
546 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6016     avg: 6522     median: 6395 (16%)     max: 7280 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 48328     avg: 49088     median: 49088 (40%)     max: 49848 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 49912     avg: 50182     median: 50182 (41%)     max: 50452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 55371     avg: 56207     median: 56206.5 (47%)     max: 57042 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5405     avg: 5910     median: 6159 (16%)     max: 6166 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 7744     avg: 8377     median: 8376.5 (15%)     max: 9009 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2464 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4647     avg: 4823     median: 4822.5 (48%)     max: 4998 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14833     avg: 15472     median: 15472 (15%)     max: 16111 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4558 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13444 Points (33%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1099     avg: 1142     median: 1161 (1%)     max: 1165 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 31051     avg: 32738     median: 32878 (27%)     max: 34285 Points
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
39.9 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
14.5 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8365U → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 23. 19:20:26

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11330 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734978026s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11330 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 11330 +0.007s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.039s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.042s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)