Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-7500 vs Intel Celeron N5095A

Intel Core i5-7500

Intel i5-7500

Der Intel Core i5-7500 ist ein Quad-Core Desktop-Prozessor der gehobenen Mittelklasse auf Basis der Kaby-Lake-Architektur, der im August 2015 vorgestellt wurde. Die in einem verbesserten 14-Nanometer-Prozess gefertigte CPU taktet mit 3,4 bis 3,8 GHz, bietet jedoch kein Hyper-Threading (daher nur 4 Threads).

Performance

Durch die relativ hohe Turbo-Taktrate positioniert sich der i5-7500 in etwa auf Höhe des mobilen Core i7-7700HQ. Auch anspruchsvollste Programme und Spiele werden von der High-End-CPU problemlos bewältigt. 

Mehr Benchmarks finden Sie auch in unserem Vergleich der AMD Ryzen 7 CPUs gegen Intel CPUs.

Grafikeinheit

Für Grafikberechnungen zeigt sich die im Prozessor integrierte Intel HD Graphics 630 mit 24 EUs (Execution Units) verantwortlich, die mit 350 - 1100 MHz taktet. Die Leistung ist vergleichbar mit der alten Intel HD Graphics 530 und siedelt sich daher im absoluten Low-End-Bereich an, sodass aktuelle Spiele allenfalls in niedrigen Einstellungen flüssig dargestellt werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Der TDP ist mit 65 Watt festgelegt und liegt damit deutlich höher als beim mobilen Core i7-7700HQ (35 Watt) aber auch deutlich unter den 91 Watt des Core i5-7600K.

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Core i5-7500Intel Celeron N5095A
CodenameKaby LakeJasper Lake
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeIntel Jasper Lake
Serie: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 « 3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock3400 - 3800 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP65 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
SocketFCLGA1151BGA1338
FeaturesDDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$202 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 i5-7500 +
585 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 i5-7500 +
159 Points (45%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 i5-7500 +
6.9 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 i5-7500 +
1.8 Points (43%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 i5-7500 +
306 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 i5-7500 +
9.7 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 i5-7500 +
2979 Points (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 i5-7500 +
39.5 fps (13%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 i5-7500 +
181.6 fps (42%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 i5-7500 +
0.3 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 i5-7500 +
0.5 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 i5-7500 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 i5-7500 +
7247 Points (15%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 i5-7500 +
9 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 i5-7500 +
22 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 i5-7500 +
569 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 i5-7500 +
6268 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 i5-7500 +
60021 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 i5-7500 +
5324 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 i5-7500 +
7619 Points (14%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 i5-7500 +
1336 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 i5-7500 +
76.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 i5-7500 +
32122 Points (27%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7500 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 03. 01:37:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9238 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733186243s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Dec 2024 05:18:52 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9238 +0s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 9238 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#10 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.009s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.009s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.015s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.018s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)