Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Core i5-13400F
► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i5-13400F ist ein top moderner und sehr schneller Desktop Prozessor auf Basis der neuen Raptor-Lake-Serie und wurde am 04.01.2023 vorgestellt. Der Prozessor bietet einen Basistakt von 2,5 GHz und erreicht bis zu 4,6 GHz im Turbo. Wie schon seit der Alder-Lake-Serie bekannt, basieren Intels aktuelle Prozessoren auf ein hybrides Design, welches P- und E-Kerne vereint. Der Intel Core i5-13400F vereint 6 P-Cores und 4 E-Cores, welche in Summe bis zu 16 Threads parallel verarbeiten können. Gefertigt wird der Prozessor weiterhin 10-nm-Fertigungsprozess. Einen frei wählbaren Multiplikator gibt es bei dem Intel Core i5-13400F nicht. Zudem verrät uns der Zusatz F, dass keine iGPU vorhanden ist. Als Basis dient der mit der Alder-Lake-Serie eingeführte LGA 1700 Sockel. Der 13400F kann entweder auf einem Raptor Lake oder Alder Lake Chip basieren. Anfangs werden Alder Lake Chips ausgeliefert.
Performance
Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-12400F konnte die IPC beim neuen Core i5-13400F etwas gesteigert werden. Gleichwohl gibt es nunmehr auch 4 E-Cores, welche dem Prozessor in puncto Multi-Thread-Performance unter die Arme greift. Somit rangiert der Intel Core i5-13400F auf dem Level eines Intel Core i5-12600K, welcher ebenfalls in Summe 16 Threads bietet.
Grafikeinheit
Alle aktuellen Intel-Prozessoren, welche das F als Namenszusatz haben, werden ohne iGPU ausgeliefert.
Leistungsaufnahme
Die TDP des Intel Core i5-13400F beläuft sich auf 65 Watt im PL1. Die PL2-Grenze definiert Intel bei 148 Watt.
Intel Core i9-13900H
► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-13900H ist eine High-End-CPU der Raptor-Lake-H Serie (RPL-H). Im Unterschied zu RPL-HX, ist die H-Serie sehr ähnlich zu den alten Alder-Lake-Prozessoren. Die CPU bietet alle 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove oder Raptor Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 20 Threads) und takten von 2,6 bis 5,4 GHz (Einzelkernturbo, 4,9 GHz für alle Kerne). Die E-Kerne takten von 1,9 - 4,1 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6920HQ).
Im Unterschied zum i9-13900HK, bietet der 13900H alle Features von vPro aber keine einfache Übertaktbarkeit.
Performance
Durch die höheren Tatkraten, kann der Core i9-13900H den älteren Core i9-12900H leicht abhängen und ist damit gemeinsam mit dem 13900HK die schnellste 45 Watt CPU von Intel. Bei ausreichender Kühlung, ist die CPU für alle Anwendungsbereiche hervorragend geeignet. Vor dem 13900H positionieren sich jedoch die HX-Modelle wie der i9-13980HX mit mehr E-Kernen und verbesserten P-Kernen.
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12900H sind alle 96 EUs aktiviert.
Features
Wie auch Alder-Lake-H, hat Raptor-Lake-H WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt nun schnelleren DDR5-5200 Speicher. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist weiterhin in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt PCIe 5.0 x8 für eine dGPU und zwei PCIe 4.0 x4 für SSDs. Der PCH bietet noch PCIe Gen3 x12.
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i9-13900H ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (PL2 115 Watt). Gefertigt wird der 13900H im weiter verbesserten Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).
| Model | Intel Core i5-13400F | Intel Core i9-13900H | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Codename | Raptor Lake-S | Raptor Lake-H | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Series | Intel Raptor Lake-S | Intel Raptor Lake-H | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Serie: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clock | 2500 - 4600 MHz | 1900 - 5400 MHz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| L1 Cache | 0.1 MB | 1.2 MB | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| L2 Cache | 9.5 MB | 11.5 MB | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| L3 Cache | 20 MB | 24 MB | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 14 / 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TDP | 65 Watt | 45 Watt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Technology | 10 nm | 10 nm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Die Size | 257 mm2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| max. Temp. | 100 °C | 100 °C | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Socket | LGA 1700 | BGA1744 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Features | Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 | DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-5200/LPDDR5-6400/LPDDR5x-6400 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, vPro Ent., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Architecture | x86 | x86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $196 U.S. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Announced | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Manufacturer | ark.intel.com | ark.intel.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| iGPU | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz) |
Benchmarks
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400F
37.9 pt (63%)
2.31 -94%
...
37.5 -1%
37.5 -1%
37.6 -1%
37.6 -1%
37.6 -1%
37.7 -1%
37.7 -1%
37.8 0%
37.8 0%
Intel Core i5-13400F
37.9
37.9 0%
37.9 0%
38 0%
38.1 1%
38.2 1%
38.3 1%
38.3 1%
38.4 1%
38.4 1%
...
60.1 59%
0%
100%
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900H
40.9 pt (68%)
2.31 -94%
...
39.8 -3%
39.9 -2%
39.9 -2%
40 -2%
40.2 -2%
40.3 -1%
40.3 -1%
40.4 -1%
40.6 -1%
Intel Core i9-13900H
40.9
40.9 0%
40.9 0%
41 0%
41 0%
41 0%
41.1 0%
41.2 1%
41.2 1%
41.5 1%
...
60.1 47%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 i9-13900H +min: 101 avg: 102.7 median: 103 (58%) max: 104 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 101 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 103 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 104 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W |
|---|---|---|
| 99% | 100% | 97% |
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 i9-13900H +min: 680 avg: 734 median: 703 (13%) max: 818 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 680 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 703 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 818 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W |
|---|---|---|
| 83% | 86% | 100% |
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
i5-13400F +15911 Points (15%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 15911 |
110%
i9-13900H +min: 11997 avg: 16813 median: 17471 (16%) max: 20385 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77% | 71% | 75% | 73% | 80% | 93% | 83% | 94% | 85% | 76% | 97% | 91% | 93% | 97% | 95% | 100% |
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
i5-13400F +1744 Points (74%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 1744 |
113%
i9-13900H +min: 1297 avg: 1887 median: 1964.5 (83%) max: 2054 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91% | 91% | 90% | 85% | 96% | 98% | 94% | 83% | 93% | 78% | 99% | 99% | 100% | 97% | 98% | 83% |
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
i5-13400F +672 Points (75%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 672 |
112%
i9-13900H +min: 428 avg: 720 median: 753 (83%) max: 792 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89% | 91% | 86% | 85% | 95% | 99% | 94% | 82% | 94% | 73% | 98% | 99% | 100% | 96% | 98% | 83% |
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
i5-13400F +6091 Points (15%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 6091 |
112%
i9-13900H +min: 4935 avg: 6533 median: 6808 (17%) max: 7716 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77% | 73% | 75% | 75% | 81% | 93% | 84% | 94% | 85% | 76% | 99% | 91% | 94% | 98% | 97% | 100% |
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
i5-13400F +2364 Points (15%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 2364 |
113%
i9-13900H +min: 2061 avg: 2676 median: 2666.5 (17%) max: 3100 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86% | 79% | 81% | 81% | 78% | 76% | 88% | 96% | 86% | 79% | 96% | 85% | 98% | 98% | 100% | 98% |
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
i5-13400F +252 Points (71%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 252 |
111%
i9-13900H +min: 211 avg: 268.9 median: 279 (78%) max: 297 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89% | 89% | 85% | 85% | 93% | 97% | 92% | 82% | 93% | 82% | 78% | 97% | 100% | 96% | 97% | 96% |
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
i5-13400F +27.5 Points (36%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 27.46 |
104%
i9-13900H +min: 27.48 avg: 28.5 median: 28.5 (37%) max: 29.65 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 27.48 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 28.47 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 29.65 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 96% | 93% | 100% | 93% |
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
i5-13400F +3.1 Points (73%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 3.06 |
97%
i9-13900H +min: 2.93 avg: 3 median: 3 (71%) max: 3 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 2.93 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 2.98 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 3 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 96% | 97% | 98% | 100% |
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
i5-13400F +8689 Points (52%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 8689 |
110%
i9-13900H +min: 9326 avg: 9502 median: 9550 (58%) max: 9630 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 9326 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 9550 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 9630 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 97% | 99% | 100% | 90% |
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
i5-13400F +51113 Points (37%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 51113 |
105%
i9-13900H +min: 53438 avg: 54582 median: 53904 (39%) max: 56403 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 53438 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 53904 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 56403 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 96% | 95% | 100% | 91% |
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
i5-13400F +82988 Points (53%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 82988 |
95%
i9-13900H +min: 76558 avg: 78476 median: 79014 (50%) max: 79856 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 76558 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 79014 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 79856 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 92% | 95% | 96% | 100% |
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
i5-13400F +13947 Points (17%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 13947 |
99%
i9-13900H +min: 13515 avg: 13696 median: 13752 (17%) max: 13820 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 13515 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 13752 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 13820 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 97% | 99% | 99% | 100% |
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
i5-13400F +367.9 s (4%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 367.879 |
89%
i9-13900H +min: 179.496 avg: 340.6 median: 412.8 (5%) max: 429.446 s
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 179.496 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 412.775 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 429.446 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | 103% | 101% |
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
i5-13400F +3.3 s (1%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 3.268 |
93%
i9-13900H +min: 3.141 avg: 3.4 median: 3.5 (1%) max: 3.521 s
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 3.141 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 3.518 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 3.521 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
i5-13400F +8602 Points (14%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 8602 |
79%
i9-13900H +min: 6365 avg: 7489 median: 6800 (11%) max: 9303 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 6365 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 6800 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 9303 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 68% | 73% | 100% | 92% |
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
i5-13400F +60048 MIPS (34%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 60048 |
117%
i9-13900H +min: 45045 avg: 66435 median: 70166 (40%) max: 79032 MIPS
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82% | 74% | 81% | 83% | 84% | 90% | 86% | 95% | 86% | 76% | 91% | 90% | 100% | 88% | 95% | 98% |
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
i5-13400F +5743 MIPS (68%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 5743 |
109%
i9-13900H +min: 3665 avg: 6054 median: 6276 (74%) max: 6600 MIPS
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93% | 93% | 88% | 87% | 93% | 94% | 91% | 85% | 93% | 77% | 97% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 95% | 94% |
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
i5-13400F +136.9 fps (46%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 136.85 |
83%
i9-13900H +min: 110.15 avg: 120.9 median: 114 (38%) max: 138.55 fps
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 110.15 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 113.95 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 138.55 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80% | 82% | 100% | 99% |
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
i5-13400F +314.5 fps (73%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 314.5 |
95%
i9-13900H +min: 284 avg: 294 median: 297.5 (69%) max: 300.5 fps
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 284 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 297.5 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 300.5 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 95% | 96% | 90% | 100% |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
i5-13400F +19.2 fps (34%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 19.2 |
98%
i9-13900H +min: 14.1 avg: 18.5 median: 18.9 (33%) max: 22.3 fps
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77% | 74% | 76% | 75% | 82% | 91% | 85% | 94% | 87% | 76% | 96% | 86% | 94% | 82% | 96% | 100% |
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
i5-13400F +1.1 GB/s (32%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 1.1 |
118%
i9-13900H +min: 1.2 avg: 1.3 median: 1.3 (38%) max: 1.4 GB/s
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 1.2 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 1.3 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 1.4 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 93% | 86% | 100% | 79% |
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
i5-13400F +2 GB/s (34%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 2 |
120%
i9-13900H +min: 2.3 avg: 2.4 median: 2.4 (41%) max: 2.5 GB/s
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 2.3 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 2.4 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 2.5 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 92% | 96% | 100% | 80% |
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
i5-13400F +12.2 GB/s (32%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 12.2 |
109%
i9-13900H +min: 13.2 avg: 13.8 median: 13.3 (35%) max: 14.8 GB/s
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 13.2 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 13.3 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 14.8 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90% | 89% | 100% | 82% |
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
i5-13400F +336 Seconds (4%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB 3.3.2 | 32 GB | 336 |
100%
i9-13900H +min: 279 avg: 348.7 median: 336 (4%) max: 467 Seconds
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 101% | 101% | 101% | 101% | 101% | 100% | 102% | 101% | 101% | 101% | 101% | 102% |
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
i5-13400F +206 Seconds (1%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 206 |
105%
i9-13900H +min: 166 avg: 205.4 median: 196 (1%) max: 268 Seconds
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 101% |
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
i5-13400F +0.5 sec (10%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 0.4606 |
107%
i9-13900H +min: 0.4052 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.723 sec
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 104% | 104% | 103% | 102% | 103% | 104% | 104% | 102% | 103% | 100% | 104% | 104% | 104% | 104% | 104% | 104% |
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
i5-13400F +13989 Points (30%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 13989 |
106%
i9-13900H +min: 13869 avg: 14775 median: 14893 (32%) max: 15501 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 13869 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 14345 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 14415 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 14769 |
| Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 15017 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 15058 |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) | i9-13900H 90 W / 70 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 140 W 2175 / 2000 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 15222 |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | i9-13900H 96 W / 84 W | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 65 W 1455 / 2000 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 15501 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 84 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 97% | 94% | 93% | 90% | 98% | 100% |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
i5-13400F +8 s (2%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 8.033 |
108%
i9-13900H +min: 6.156 avg: 7 median: 7.4 (2%) max: 7.512 s
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 6.156 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 7.445 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 7.512 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
i5-13400F +17.9 s (1%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 17.914 |
110%
i9-13900H +min: 13.784 avg: 15.5 median: 16.2 (1%) max: 16.436 s
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 13.784 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 16.234 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 16.436 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
i5-13400F +420.5 s (2%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 420.477 |
101%
i9-13900H +min: 350.453 avg: 397.4 median: 417.1 (2%) max: 424.723 s
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 350.453 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 417.103 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 424.723 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
i5-13400F +77937 Points (60%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 77937 |
81%
i9-13900H +min: 55574 avg: 64502 median: 63194 (49%) max: 75108 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 55574 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 58858 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 59595 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 63194 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 67507 |
| Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 71680 |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | i9-13900H 96 W / 84 W | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 65 W 1455 / 2000 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 75108 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 84 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76% | 76% | 89% | 100% | 96% |
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
i5-13400F +23820 Points (60%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 23820 |
94%
i9-13900H +min: 15540 avg: 21781 median: 22343 (56%) max: 25420 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88% | 81% | 77% | 82% | 90% | 95% | 88% | 86% | 93% | 80% | 94% | 88% | 100% | 80% | 92% | 73% |
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
i5-13400F +77765 Points (63%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 77765 |
121%
i9-13900H +min: 83732 avg: 94385 median: 93901 (76%) max: 103874 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 83732 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 85770 |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | i9-13900H 115 W / 50 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU 65 W 6 GB | 16 GB | 88687 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 92497 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 93000 |
| Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | i9-13900H 115 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 16 GB | 94802 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 95033 |
| MSI Stealth 16 Mercedes-AMG Motorsport A13VG | i9-13900H 160 W / 100 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 105 W 1980 / 2000 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 102969 |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | i9-13900H 80 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU 55 W 8 GB | 32 GB | 103488 |
| Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601VI | i9-13900H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 100 W 2030 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 103874 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 100 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92% | 88% | 86% | 91% | 88% | 100% |
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
i5-13400F +76636 Points (62%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 76636 |
122%
i9-13900H +min: 85594 avg: 91529 median: 93285 (76%) max: 95474 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 85594 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 87648 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 93215 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 93355 |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | i9-13900H 115 W / 50 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU 65 W 6 GB | 16 GB | 93890 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 95474 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93% | 97% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
i5-13400F +80273 Points (67%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 80273 |
119%
i9-13900H +min: 89904 avg: 94148 median: 95253 (79%) max: 98040 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 89904 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 89952 |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | i9-13900H 115 W / 45 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 16 GB | 94133 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 96373 |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | i9-13900H 115 W / 50 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU 65 W 6 GB | 16 GB | 96483 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 98040 |
| CPU TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96% | 98% | 100% | 100% | 83% |
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
i5-13400F +19846 Points (50%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 19846 |
90%
i9-13900H +min: 12004 avg: 17867 median: 17844.5 (45%) max: 22184 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89% | 86% | 71% | 58% | 84% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 95% | 96% | 99% |
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
i5-13400F +28087 Points (50%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 28087 |
96%
i9-13900H +min: 17733 avg: 26658 median: 27039 (48%) max: 32664 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83% | 79% | 66% | 77% | 89% | 93% | 78% | 94% | 89% | 74% | 100% | 89% | 93% | 69% | 92% | 89% |
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
i5-13400F +12669 Points (53%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 12669 |
92%
i9-13900H +min: 7863 avg: 11535 median: 11648 (49%) max: 13726 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83% | 77% | 80% | 57% | 93% | 99% | 79% | 99% | 91% | 82% | 99% | 90% | 98% | 80% | 100% | 98% |
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 i9-13900H +min: 2415 avg: 2640 median: 2645 (67%) max: 2807 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 100 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92% | 97% | 98% | 88% | 95% | 94% | 95% | 96% | 99% | 100% |
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 i9-13900H +min: 11118 avg: 12749 median: 12611 (50%) max: 14404 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 100 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90% | 84% | 88% | 77% | 99% | 100% | 88% | 98% | 87% | 84% |
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
i5-13400F +1792 Points (70%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 1792 |
109%
i9-13900H +min: 1140 avg: 1895 median: 1955 (76%) max: 2043 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90% | 94% | 96% | 85% | 93% | 100% | 95% | 84% | 93% | 73% | 95% | 96% | 98% | 97% | 98% | 100% |
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
i5-13400F +12095 Points (22%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 12095 |
107%
i9-13900H +min: 9094 avg: 12649 median: 12890 (23%) max: 15410 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87% | 80% | 82% | 70% | 91% | 100% | 91% | 94% | 88% | 77% | 87% | 79% | 99% | 89% | 95% | 94% |
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
i5-13400F +1721 Points (7%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 1721 |
106%
i9-13900H +min: 1654 avg: 1801 median: 1828.5 (8%) max: 1958 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 | i9-13900H 135 W / 115 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU 105 W 1665 / 2250 MHz 12 GB | 64 GB | 1654 |
| Geekom Mini IT13 | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1 GB | 32 GB | 1674 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 1678 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 1810 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 1847 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 1859 |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | i9-13900H 118 W / 56 W | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 95 W 1680 / 2250 MHz 16 GB | 32 GB | 1931 |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | i9-13900H 107 W / 81 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 140 W 1845 / 2050 MHz 8 GB | 16 GB | 1958 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86% | 91% | 99% | 94% | 88% | 100% | 84% |
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
i5-13400F +12009 Points (38%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 12009 |
102%
i9-13900H +min: 11168 avg: 12381 median: 12212 (39%) max: 14172 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 11168 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 11425 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 11464 |
| Geekom Mini IT13 | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1 GB | 32 GB | 11743 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 12681 |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | i9-13900H 107 W / 81 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 140 W 1845 / 2050 MHz 8 GB | 16 GB | 12699 |
| MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 | i9-13900H 135 W / 115 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU 105 W 1665 / 2250 MHz 12 GB | 64 GB | 13696 |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | i9-13900H 118 W / 56 W | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 95 W 1680 / 2250 MHz 16 GB | 32 GB | 14172 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81% | 81% | 100% | 89% | 85% | 90% | 97% |
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
i5-13400F +7684 Points (77%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 7684 |
107%
i9-13900H +min: 7253 avg: 7955 median: 8190 (82%) max: 8498 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom Mini IT13 | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1 GB | 32 GB | 7253 |
| Geekom Mini IT13 | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1 GB | 32 GB | 7257 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 7389 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 7787 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 8190 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 8342 |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | i9-13900H 100 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 65 W 1620 / 2025 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 8409 |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | i9-13900H 140 W / 100 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU 150 W 16 GB | 64 GB | 8466 |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | i9-13900H 140 W / 100 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU 150 W 16 GB | 64 GB | 8498 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 100 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87% | 90% | 97% | 95% | 100% |
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
i5-13400F +43856 Points (44%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 43856 |
103%
i9-13900H +min: 41851 avg: 47143 median: 45193 (45%) max: 54848 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekom GT13 Pro | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1500 MHz | 32 GB | 41851 |
| Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | 2469 / 2250 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 42384 |
| Geekom XT13 Pro | i9-13900H | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 42713 |
| Geekom Mini IT13 | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1 GB | 32 GB | 45069 |
| Geekom Mini IT13 | i9-13900H 65 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs 1 GB | 32 GB | 45193 |
| Minisforum MS-01 | i9-13900H 80 W / 60 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32 GB | 47461 |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | i9-13900H 100 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 65 W 1620 / 2025 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 50450 |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | i9-13900H 140 W / 100 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU 150 W 16 GB | 64 GB | 54321 |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | i9-13900H 140 W / 100 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU 150 W 16 GB | 64 GB | 54848 |
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 100 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78% | 80% | 87% | 86% | 100% |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
i5-13400F +535 ms (1%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB Chrome 82 | 32 GB | 535 |
112%
i9-13900H +min: 456 avg: 507 median: 479 (1%) max: 828 ms
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 i9-13900H +min: 85435 avg: 97010 median: 100627 (84%) max: 102947 Points
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 | i9-13900H 135 W / 115 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU 105 W 1665 / 2250 MHz 12 GB | 64 GB | 85435 |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | i9-13900H 115 W / 45 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 16 GB | 91064 |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | i9-13900H 96 W / 84 W | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 65 W 1455 / 2000 MHz 8 GB | 32 GB | 100022 |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | i9-13900H 64 W / 35 W | Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 16 GB | 101232 |
| Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | i9-13900H 120 W / 90 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 90 W 2310 / 2000 MHz 8 GB Edge 112 | 32 GB | 101357 |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | i9-13900H 100 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 65 W 1620 / 2025 MHz 8 GB Edge 111 | 32 GB | 102947 |
| CPU TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98% | 88% | 100% | 97% | 98% | 83% |
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
i5-13400F +254 Points (71%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB Chrome 105.0.0.0 | 32 GB | 254 |
112%
i9-13900H +min: 133.5 avg: 274 median: 283.5 (79%) max: 348 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72% | 90% | 84% | 69% | 84% | 86% | 85% | 69% | 81% | 39% | 85% | 100% | 85% | 87% | 84% | 68% |
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
i5-13400F +294 Points (54%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB Chrome 82 | 32 GB | 294 |
107%
i9-13900H +min: 171.4 avg: 301.6 median: 316 (58%) max: 340 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86% | 88% | 94% | 97% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 89% | 72% | 94% | 96% | 99% | 90% | 78% |
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
i5-13400F +1941 Points (74%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 1941 |
99%
i9-13900H +min: 1104 avg: 1871 median: 1912 (73%) max: 2146 Points
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% | 99% | 93% | 87% | 100% | 97% | 100% | 95% | 97% | 77% | 100% | 94% | 98% | 100% | 99% | 88% |
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i5-13400F +214 Watt (37%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 214 |
214%
1 i9-13900H +min: 38.1 avg: 100 median: 100.1 (17%) max: 154 Watt
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 112% | 119% | 123% | 112% | 113% | 110% | 112% | 110% | 102% | 112% | 100% | 114% | 109% | 109% | 108% | 100% |
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i5-13400F +184.2 Watt (34%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 184.2 |
160%
1 i9-13900H +min: 66.1 avg: 123.7 median: 114.8 (21%) max: 196.9 Watt
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 131% | 132% | 134% | 132% | 123% | 107% | 124% | 113% | 115% | 127% | 100% | 126% | 109% | 104% | 114% | 114% |
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i5-13400F +76.3 Watt (50%)
| Modell | CPU | GPU | RAM | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | i5-13400F 148 W / 65 W | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 W 1695 / 1219 MHz 24 GB | 32 GB | 76.3 |
528%
1 i9-13900H +min: 2.9 avg: 13.7 median: 14.5 (10%) max: 28.1 Watt
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 116% | 123% | 126% | 112% | 118% | 124% | 119% | 120% | 100% | 121% | 114% | 117% | 119% | 114% | 123% | 115% |
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 i9-13900H +min: 4.85 avg: 13.3 median: 12.3 (14%) max: 24 Watt
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 45 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 70 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 90 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 107% | 119% | 117% | 110% | 121% | 120% | 110% | 118% | 121% | 100% | 117% | 119% | 105% | 110% | 104% |
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 i9-13900H +min: 13.6 avg: 27.8 median: 22 (16%) max: 97.6 Points per Watt
| CPU TDP ? | TDP 35 W | TDP 50 W | TDP 51 W | TDP 56 W | TDP 60 W | TDP 61 W | TDP 65 W | TDP 81 W | TDP 84 W | TDP 100 W | TDP 110 W | TDP 115 W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58% | 100% | 62% | 44% | 28% | 46% | 41% | 46% | 32% | 53% | 35% | 44% | 44% |
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400F → 100% n=48
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900H → 104% n=48
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 02. 07:54:25
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 14966 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 14717 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733122465s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Dec 2024 05:18:52 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14966 +0.004s ... 0.01s
#8 got single benchmarks 14966 +0.004s ... 0.014s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14717 +0.004s ... 0.018s
#10 got single benchmarks 14717 +0.034s ... 0.053s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.064s ... 0.116s
#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.119s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
