Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1334U vs Intel Core i9-14900

Intel Core i5-1334U

Intel i5-1334U

Der Intel Core i5-1334U ist eine Mittelklasse-Notebook-CPU auf Basis der Raptor Lake-U (RPL-U) Serie (Alder-Lake-Architektur), die im Januar 2023 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU bietet 2 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 12 Threads) und takten von 1,3 bis 4,6 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 0,9 - 3,4 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6300HQ). Weiters unterstützt der i5-1345U vPro-Essentials-Management-Features. Im Vergleich zum i5-1335U unterstützt der 1334U nur langsameren LPDDR5-5200 Hauptspeicher (vs 6400 beim 1335U und schnelleren CPUs).

Performance

Durch die ähnlichen Taktraten, ist die Performance vergleichbar mit dem alten Core i7-1250U (+100 MHz P-Kerne Basistakt im Vergleich). Wie üblich bei Alder Lake ist die Performance stark abhängig von der Kühlung und den TDP Settings.

Grafikeinheit

Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 1334U sind 80 der 96 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,25 GHz.

Features

Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR5-5200. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt weiterhin nur PCIe 4.0 (x8 for GPU und zwei x4 für SSDs).

Leistungsaufnahme

Der Intel Core i5-1334U ist mit 15 Watt (PL1) TDP und 55 Watt (PL2) max. Turbo Power angegeben. Gefertigt wird der Prozessor im weiter verbesserten Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).

Intel Core i9-14900

► remove from comparison

ModelIntel Core i5-1334UIntel Core i9-14900
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-UIntel Raptor Lake-R
CodenameRaptor Lake-URaptor Lake
Serie: Raptor Lake-R Raptor Lake
Intel Core i7-1365U compare1.3 - 5.2 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1355U compare1.2 - 5 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1345U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1335U compare0.9 - 4.6 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1334U « 0.9 - 4.6 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1315U compare0.9 - 4.5 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1305U compare1.2 - 4.5 GHz5 / 6 cores10 MB L3
Intel Processor U300 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900K compare3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K compare2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900 «  cores
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500 compare2.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T compare1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock900 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache928 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 12
TDP15 Watt
Technology10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1700
FeaturesThread Director
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900
47.7 pt (79%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
129 Points (90%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1245 Points (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
31070 Points (29%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2212 Points (94%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
846 Points (94%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
11291 Points (28%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4793 Points (30%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
315 Points (91%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
56.6 Points (74%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (94%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
12284 Points (74%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
82492 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
121768 Points (84%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17590 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
85.6 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
12359 Points (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
101652 MIPS (58%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
7276 MIPS (87%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
222 fps (77%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
358.5 fps (83%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
31.6 fps (56%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.4 GB/s (73%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
4.9 GB/s (84%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
18.5 GB/s (48%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
263 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
131 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
18728 Points (40%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
5.8 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
12.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
303.4 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
93183 Points (82%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
28622 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
88787 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
90442 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
93001 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20179 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
42316 Points (75%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
19492 Points (82%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
3022 Points (81%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
15962 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2140 Points (85%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
17395 Points (31%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2077 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
17218 Points (54%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9143 Points (91%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
67178 Points (74%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
436 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
315 Points (66%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2133 Points (82%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
145.5 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
253 Watt (46%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.9 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
18.9 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 19. 22:01:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14918 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18150 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726776084s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:16:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14918 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 14918 +0s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18150 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#10 got single benchmarks 18150 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.039s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.042s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)