Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1155G7 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6770

Intel Core i5-1155G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1155G7

Der Intel Core i5-1155G7 ist ein sparsamer Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Tiger-Lake-Architektur basiert und Mitte 2021 vorgestellt wurde (als Teil des Refresh). Tiger Lake wird im verbesserten 10nm+-Verfahren bei Intel gefertigt und nutzt die neuen Willow Cove CPU-Kerne mit einer neuen Architektur. Die Basis-Taktraten sind je nach TDP Einstellung unterschiedlich. Bei 12 Watt 1 GHz und bei maximalen 28 Watt taktet er mit garantierten 2,5 GHz. Der Boost Takt ist bei allen mit maximal 4,5 GHz spezifiziert.

Eine weitere Neuerung ist die integrierte Intel Xe G7 Grafikkarte (Gen 12) mit 80 EUs und bis zu 1,35 GHz welche eine deutlich höhere Leistung wie die alte Iris Plus G7 in Ice Lake bietet.

Wie bisher wird auch weiterhin WLAN (Wifi 6) und Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 im Chip teilintegriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks. 

Alle Artikel über Tiger Lake, finden Sie auf unserer Tiger-Lake-Übersichtsseite.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9400

► remove from comparison Intel T9400

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der oberen Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der Prozessor ist gleich schnell wie der sparsamere Core 2 Duo P9500 (25 Watt TDP).

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo T9400 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.53 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo P9500 und dadurch sollte sie für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Intel Core 2 Duo T6770

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 ist ein Notebookprozessor basierend auf den Penryn Kern. Er bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist daher langsamer als andere Core 2 Duo mit 2.3 GHz.

 

show full text
ModelIntel Core i5-1155G7Intel Core 2 Duo T9400Intel Core 2 Duo T6770
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3PenrynPenryn
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core i7-1195G72.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G73 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G72.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G72.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G72.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G42 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G43 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 « 2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 « 2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2500 - 4500 MHz2530 MHz2300 MHz
L1 Cache320 KB128 KB
L2 Cache5 MB6 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 22 / 2
TDP28 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm45 nm45 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1449BGA479, PGA478
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
FSB1066800
Transistors410 Million
Voltage1.050V-1.162V V
Die Size107 mm2
$316 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1155G7
31.7 pt (53%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -93%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100
30.9 -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
31 -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
31.2 -2%
Intel Core i7-10750H
31.2 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 5560U
31.2 -2%
Intel Xeon E-2276M
31.3 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
31.4 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
31.6 0%
Intel Core Ultra 5 134U
31.6 0%
Intel Core i5-1155G7
31.7
Intel Core i7-10850H
31.7 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
31.8 0%
Intel Core i7-10875H
32.1 1%
Intel Core i5-11320H
32.1 1%
Intel Core i7-10870H
32.1 1%
Intel Core i3-1215U
32.2 2%
Intel Core i9-9980HK
32.2 2%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
32.2 2%
Intel Core i7-1185G7
32.3 2%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 50%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 90%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 5471     avg: 5625     median: 5612 (5%)     max: 5791 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1362     avg: 1409     median: 1419 (60%)     max: 1446 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 521     avg: 541     median: 550 (61%)     max: 551 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2123     avg: 2190     median: 2173 (5%)     max: 2273 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 858     avg: 892     median: 890 (6%)     max: 928 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 210     avg: 210.7     median: 211 (59%)     max: 211 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 2713     avg: 2848     median: 2818 (17%)     max: 3207 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 5008     avg: 5341     median: 5267.5 (4%)     max: 6173 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T9400 +
1641 s (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 30.1     avg: 37.7     median: 31 (6%)     max: 52.1 s
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 24862     avg: 25019     median: 24992 (14%)     max: 25203 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4603     avg: 4831     median: 4941 (58%)     max: 4949 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.13     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (13%)     max: 7.55 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 979     avg: 1011     median: 1011 (13%)     max: 1043 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 536     avg: 547     median: 540 (4%)     max: 566 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.605     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.616 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 2026     avg: 2262     median: 2304 (5%)     max: 2349 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 17.75     avg: 18.1     median: 18.1 (4%)     max: 18.55 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 42.53     avg: 43.1     median: 43 (2%)     max: 44.02 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 1107     avg: 1150     median: 1164 (5%)     max: 1180 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T9400 +
23652 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T9400 +
17818 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 2293     avg: 5930     median: 6175 (13%)     max: 7555 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9400 +
5.4 Points (77%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 3066     avg: 4502     median: 4892 (4%)     max: 5156 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11355     avg: 11710     median: 11849 (30%)     max: 11925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9401     avg: 9981     median: 10243 (26%)     max: 10298 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14439     avg: 14655     median: 14727 (26%)     max: 14798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5082     avg: 5291     median: 5223 (22%)     max: 5569 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1461     avg: 1471     median: 1473 (58%)     max: 1480 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5654     avg: 5747     median: 5761 (10%)     max: 5825 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6195     avg: 6306     median: 6305.5 (63%)     max: 6416 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21969     avg: 22182     median: 22182 (22%)     max: 22395 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 669     avg: 690     median: 689 (1%)     max: 712 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 189.5     avg: 190.1     median: 190.1 (53%)     max: 190.6 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 242     avg: 243.7     median: 244 (45%)     max: 245 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1381     avg: 1388     median: 1388 (53%)     max: 1395 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.2     avg: 45.5     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 49.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 50.7     avg: 55.7     median: 58.2 (11%)     max: 58.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.17     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (2%)     max: 3.48 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.5     avg: 5.8     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 6.07 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 14.7     avg: 16.1     median: 15.3 (11%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1155G7 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 19. 17:39:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13226 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 393 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 468 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734626375s time from redirect:3 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:18:43 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13226 +0.002s ... 0.005s

#9 got single benchmarks 13226 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 393 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#11 got single benchmarks 393 +0.018s ... 0.025s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 468 +0.001s ... 0.026s

#13 got single benchmarks 468 +0s ... 0.026s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.04s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.04s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)