Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1155G7 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380

Intel Core i5-1155G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1155G7

Der Intel Core i5-1155G7 ist ein sparsamer Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Tiger-Lake-Architektur basiert und Mitte 2021 vorgestellt wurde (als Teil des Refresh). Tiger Lake wird im verbesserten 10nm+-Verfahren bei Intel gefertigt und nutzt die neuen Willow Cove CPU-Kerne mit einer neuen Architektur. Die Basis-Taktraten sind je nach TDP Einstellung unterschiedlich. Bei 12 Watt 1 GHz und bei maximalen 28 Watt taktet er mit garantierten 2,5 GHz. Der Boost Takt ist bei allen mit maximal 4,5 GHz spezifiziert.

Eine weitere Neuerung ist die integrierte Intel Xe G7 Grafikkarte (Gen 12) mit 80 EUs und bis zu 1,35 GHz welche eine deutlich höhere Leistung wie die alte Iris Plus G7 in Ice Lake bietet.

Wie bisher wird auch weiterhin WLAN (Wifi 6) und Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 im Chip teilintegriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks. 

Alle Artikel über Tiger Lake, finden Sie auf unserer Tiger-Lake-Übersichtsseite.

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Duo SL9380 ist ein stromsparender Low Voltage Prozessor für dünne und leichte Notebooks. Er bietet den vollen 6MB Level 2 Cache des Penryn Kerns und bietet dadurch eine bessere Performance als andere 1.8 GHz Core 2 Duo Prozessoren mit weniger Cache (1-3MB üblich). Im Vergleich zum SL9400 bietet der SL9400 einen langsameren FSB mit 800 MHz (statt 1066) und genau 1.8 GHz (Multiplikator 9).

show full text
ModelIntel Core i5-1155G7Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3Penryn
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 « 1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2500 - 4500 MHz1800 MHz
L1 Cache320 KB
L2 Cache5 MB6 MB
L3 Cache8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 2
TDP28 Watt17 Watt
Technology10 nm45 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1449BGA956
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXT
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
FSB800
Transistors410 Million
Die Size107 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1155G7
31.7 pt (53%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -93%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100
30.9 -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
31 -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
31.2 -2%
Intel Core i7-10750H
31.2 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 5560U
31.2 -2%
Intel Xeon E-2276M
31.3 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
31.4 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
31.6 0%
Intel Core Ultra 5 134U
31.6 0%
Intel Core i5-1155G7
31.7
Intel Core i7-10850H
31.7 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
31.8 0%
Intel Core i7-10875H
32.1 1%
Intel Core i5-11320H
32.1 1%
Intel Core i7-10870H
32.1 1%
Intel Core i3-1215U
32.2 2%
Intel Core i9-9980HK
32.2 2%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
32.2 2%
Intel Core i7-1185G7
32.3 2%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 50%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 90%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 5471     avg: 5625     median: 5612 (5%)     max: 5791 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1362     avg: 1409     median: 1419 (60%)     max: 1446 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 521     avg: 541     median: 550 (61%)     max: 551 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2123     avg: 2190     median: 2173 (5%)     max: 2273 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 858     avg: 892     median: 890 (6%)     max: 928 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 210     avg: 210.7     median: 211 (59%)     max: 211 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 24862     avg: 25019     median: 24992 (14%)     max: 25203 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4603     avg: 4831     median: 4941 (58%)     max: 4949 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.13     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (13%)     max: 7.55 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 979     avg: 1011     median: 1011 (13%)     max: 1043 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 536     avg: 547     median: 540 (4%)     max: 566 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.605     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.616 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11355     avg: 11710     median: 11849 (30%)     max: 11925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9401     avg: 9981     median: 10243 (26%)     max: 10298 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14439     avg: 14655     median: 14727 (26%)     max: 14798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5082     avg: 5291     median: 5223 (22%)     max: 5569 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1461     avg: 1471     median: 1473 (58%)     max: 1480 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5654     avg: 5747     median: 5761 (10%)     max: 5825 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6195     avg: 6306     median: 6305.5 (63%)     max: 6416 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21969     avg: 22182     median: 22182 (22%)     max: 22395 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 669     avg: 690     median: 689 (1%)     max: 712 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 189.5     avg: 190.1     median: 190.1 (53%)     max: 190.6 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 242     avg: 243.7     median: 244 (45%)     max: 245 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1381     avg: 1388     median: 1388 (53%)     max: 1395 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.2     avg: 45.5     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 49.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 50.7     avg: 55.7     median: 58.2 (11%)     max: 58.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.17     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (2%)     max: 3.48 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.5     avg: 5.8     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 6.07 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 14.7     avg: 16.1     median: 15.3 (11%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1155G7 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 19. 14:00:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13226 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 497 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734613252s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:18:43 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13226 +0.006s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 13226 +0.012s ... 0.024s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 497 +0.001s ... 0.025s

#10 got single benchmarks 497 +0s ... 0.025s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.039s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.041s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)