Intel Core i5-11400H vs Intel Core i9-12900HK
Intel Core i5-11400H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i5-11400H ist ein Hexa-Core-Prozessor für Gaming-Notebooks und Workstations. Er basiert auf die Tiger-Lake-Architektur (H45) und wurde im 2. Quartal 2021 präsentiert. Der Chip bietet einen TDP von 45 Watt (konfigurierbar). Die sechs Prozessorkerne können von 2,7 bis 4,5 GHz (Einzelkern-Turbo) takten. Alle Kerne gemeinsam können maximal 4,1 GHz erreichen. Der Prozessor bietet 12 MB Level 3 Cache und unterstützt DDR4-3200 Speicher. Die integrierte Grafik basiert auf die Xe-Architektur und ist UHD Graphics benannt (32 EUs). Im 11400H taktet sie von 350 - 1450 MHz. Der Chip wird im neuen 10nm SuperFin Prozess gefertigt.
Dank der neuen Tiger Lake Architektur sollte die Leistung deutlich oberhalb des Vorgängers, dem Intel Core i7-10850H (Comet Lake-H, 6 Kerne, 2,7 - 5,1 GHz, 16 MB L3) liegen (Einzel- und Mehrkernperformance). Damit sollte die Performance vergleichbar sein eines einem aktuellem Ryzen 5 5600H (Zen 3, 6 Kerne, 3,3 - 4,4 GHz, 16 MB L3), oder auch etwas langsamer.
Wie bei den kleineren Tiger-Lake-Chips wird auch hier WLAN (Wifi 6E) und Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 im Chip (teil-)integriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks. Weiters bietet der i5-11400H 20 PCIe 4.0 Lanes.
Der TDP ist bei 2,7 GHz Basistakt mit 45 Watt spezifiziert und kann auf 35 Watt und dadurch 2,2 GHz verringert werden (cTDP). Dadurch eignet sich die CPU am besten für große und schwere Notebooks.
Intel Core i9-12900HK ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-12900HK ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur, die im Januar 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-P Chip (für H und P-Serie) und bietet alle 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 20 Threads) und takten von 2,5 bis 5 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,8 - 3,8 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6920HQ ). Die K-Variante bezeichnet den freien Multiplikator, wodurch sich die CPU übertakten lässt. Im Unterschied zum 12900H, bietet der 12900HK nur die "Essentials"-Features von vPro.
Performance
Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-11980HK (Tiger Lake-H mit 8 Kernen) kann der 12900HK in allen Bereichen punkten. Die neuen Golden Cove Kerne bieten eine leicht höhere Single Thread Performance und dank der gesamt 14 Kerne können Multi-Thread-Anwendungen deutlich beschleunigt werden. Intel gibt z.b. bei Spielen eine durchschnittlich 13% höhere Performance an und bei Blender Rendering 30% weniger Renderzeit (BMW Car Demo). In unseren Tests ist die Performance stark abhängig von den TDP Settings und der Kühlung und kann sich im Schnitt etwas vom Ryzen 9 6900HX absetzen (+11% zur Zeit des Schreibens, siehe Vergleich ).
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12900HK sind alle 96 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,45 GHz.
Features
Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200 und LPDDR4x-4267. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt nur PCIe 4.0 (x8 for GPU und zwei x4 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i9-12900HK ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (PL2 115 Watt). Die meisten Notebooks werden aber einen PL1 von etwa 60 Watt erlauben. Bei geringer Last, sollte der Stromverbrauch dank der sparsamen Gracemont Kerne sehr gut sein. Gefertigt wird der 12900HK im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).
Model Intel Core i5-11400H Intel Core i9-12900HK Series Intel Tiger Lake Intel Alder Lake-P Codename Tiger Lake-H Alder Lake-H Serie: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H Clock 2700 - 4500 MHz 1800 - 5000 MHz L1 Cache 480 KB 1.2 MB L2 Cache 7.5 MB 11.5 MB L3 Cache 12 MB 24 MB Cores / Threads 6 / 12 14 / 20 TDP 45 Watt 45 Watt Technology 10 nm 10 nm max. Temp. 100 °C 100 °C Socket BGA1787 BGA1744 Features DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA iGPU Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (350 - 1450 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11400H
33 pt (55%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900HK
39.4 pt (66%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
86 Points (49%)
min: 105 avg: 109.5 median: 109.5 (62%) max: 114 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 100% 95%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
414 Points (8%)
min: 746 avg: 811 median: 811 (15%) max: 876 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 100% 66%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6674 avg: 8150 median: 8451 (8%) max: 9406 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 100% 72% 73% 92% 84%
min: 13410 avg: 17662 median: 18373 (17%) max: 19282 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 69% 35% 36% 64% 41% 71% 96% 97% 100% 100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1349 avg: 1428 median: 1460.5 (62%) max: 1472 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 92% 100% 92% 100% 99%
min: 1586 avg: 1797 median: 1901 (81%) max: 1940 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 75% 76% 70% 86% 75% 82% 100% 98% 86% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 522 avg: 557 median: 561 (62%) max: 569 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 92% 100% 98% 99% 99%
min: 596 avg: 679 median: 685 (76%) max: 739 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 80% 78% 76% 88% 77% 83% 93% 100% 81% 99%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2550 avg: 3142 median: 3283 (8%) max: 3740 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 100% 71% 75% 92% 82%
min: 5168 avg: 6742 median: 7040 (17%) max: 7366 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 70% 35% 38% 64% 41% 72% 96% 95% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1014 avg: 1297 median: 1277 (8%) max: 1532 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 100% 66% 79% 95% 80%
min: 1975 avg: 2695 median: 2836 (18%) max: 2944 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 69% 35% 41% 67% 42% 68% 95% 100% 98% 100%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 202 avg: 214.3 median: 218 (61%) max: 219 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 92% 100% 96% 100% 100%
min: 226 avg: 258.1 median: 270 (76%) max: 279 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 78% 78% 75% 87% 78% 81% 100% 99% 86% 97%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 13.31 avg: 14.6 median: 14.6 (19%) max: 15.97 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 83% 100%
min: 23.44 avg: 27.9 median: 27.3 (35%) max: 33 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 40% 65% 71% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.45 avg: 2.5 median: 2.5 (59%) max: 2.55 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 96% 100%
min: 2.69 avg: 3.1 median: 3.3 (77%) max: 3.28 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 75% 89% 82% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8611 avg: 8712 median: 8712 (53%) max: 8813 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 98% 100%
min: 7710 avg: 8840 median: 9397 (57%) max: 9412 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 91% 97% 82% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 36972 avg: 39096 median: 39095.5 (28%) max: 41219 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 90% 100%
min: 48838 avg: 51988 median: 49924 (36%) max: 57202 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 65% 80% 85% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
54687 Points (35%)
min: 75223 avg: 75585 median: 75585 (48%) max: 75947 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 87% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
11530 Points (14%)
min: 12378 avg: 13841 median: 13840.5 (17%) max: 15303 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 92%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 140.674 avg: 231.8 median: 231.8 (3%) max: 323 s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 100% 102%
min: 186.394 avg: 193.7 median: 193.7 (2%) max: 201.062 s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 102% 101%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4.498 avg: 6.8 median: 6.8 (1%) max: 9.1 s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 100% 101%
min: 3.375 avg: 3.4 median: 3.4 (1%) max: 3.454 s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 101% 101%
min: 5477 avg: 5571 median: 5571 (9%) max: 5665 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 100% 97%
min: 7387 avg: 8565 median: 8735 (14%) max: 9573 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 59% 74% 77% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 27615 avg: 33927 median: 33444 (19%) max: 40268 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 100% 76% 80% 91% 69%
min: 55620 avg: 68839 median: 72836 (42%) max: 75564 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 77% 41% 44% 67% 38% 77% 93% 99% 100% 94%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4802 avg: 5104 median: 5116 (60%) max: 5343 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 91% 98% 97% 100% 97%
min: 5257 avg: 5769 median: 5803 (68%) max: 6186 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 81% 83% 82% 91% 82% 86% 100% 99% 85% 94%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 62 avg: 69.9 median: 69.9 (23%) max: 77.85 fps
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 80% 100%
min: 113.7 avg: 132.8 median: 125.1 (42%) max: 159.6 fps
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 39% 64% 71% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 138 avg: 182.3 median: 182.3 (42%) max: 226.5 fps
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 61% 100%
min: 276 avg: 298 median: 300.4 (69%) max: 317.5 fps
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 46% 91% 92% 100%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.19 avg: 9.6 median: 9.6 (17%) max: 11.3 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 100% 72% 80% 92% 75%
min: 15.7 avg: 19.4 median: 20.5 (36%) max: 21.6 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 73% 38% 42% 65% 40% 73% 85% 93% 96% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.78 avg: 0.8 median: 0.8 (23%) max: 0.815 GB/s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 96% 100%
min: 1.2 avg: 1.3 median: 1.3 (38%) max: 1.5 GB/s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 52% 67% 87% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.2 avg: 1.3 median: 1.3 (22%) max: 1.3 GB/s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 92% 100%
min: 2.2 avg: 2.4 median: 2.3 (40%) max: 2.6 GB/s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 46% 67% 88% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9 avg: 8.2 median: 8.2 (21%) max: 8.4 GB/s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 94% 100%
min: 13 avg: 14.5 median: 14.1 (37%) max: 16.3 GB/s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 48% 66% 87% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
662 Seconds (8%)
413 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 340 avg: 399.5 median: 396 (3%) max: 483 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 101% 100% 100% 101% 100%
min: 172.5 avg: 191.9 median: 181 (1%) max: 234 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 102% 100% 100% 101% 100% 102% 102% 102% 102% 102%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.581 avg: 0.6 median: 0.6 (13%) max: 0.644 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 100% 102% 101% 102% 101%
min: 0.4155 avg: 0.5 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.4997 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 101% 100% 102% 100% 103% 105% 104% 103% 104%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12039 avg: 12170 median: 12043 (26%) max: 12429 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 98% 100%
min: 13096 avg: 15289 median: 15597.5 (33%) max: 16864 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 71% 77% 78% 100% 99%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.5 avg: 7.5 median: 7.5 (2%) max: 7.549 s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 100% 100%
min: 7.281 avg: 7.7 median: 7.3 (2%) max: 8.438 s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.3 avg: 16.3 median: 16.3 (1%) max: 16.303 s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 100% 100%
min: 16.1 avg: 17.2 median: 16.5 (1%) max: 18.844 s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 338.041 avg: 487.5 median: 487.5 (2%) max: 637 s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 100% 101%
min: 383.9 avg: 405.7 median: 397.4 (2%) max: 435.936 s
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 101% 101% 101%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 43773 avg: 47410 median: 47410 (36%) max: 51047 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 86% 100%
min: 59882 avg: 65775 median: 60056 (46%) max: 77386 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 57% 72% 77% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8859 avg: 12046 median: 11488.5 (29%) max: 15086 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 100% 76% 83% 91% 61%
min: 17378 avg: 22097 median: 22297.5 (56%) max: 25556 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 71% 44% 48% 69% 36% 70% 98% 94% 84% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 35428 avg: 52471 median: 52470.5 (43%) max: 69513 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 100% 51%
min: 66129 avg: 78262 median: 71995 (58%) max: 96663 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 97% 92% 92% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
35070 Points (28%)
min: 65657 avg: 78481 median: 72055 (58%) max: 97730 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 92% 91% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 69034 avg: 70364 median: 70347 (58%) max: 71711 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 97% 100%
min: 75600 avg: 88980 median: 88770 (74%) max: 102779 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W 73% 86% 80% 100% 88%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9771 avg: 10834 median: 10594 (27%) max: 12377 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 96% 100% 86%
min: 16214 avg: 18700 median: 18585 (47%) max: 21231 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 51% 71% 46% 76% 92% 94% 83% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9406 avg: 16286 median: 16949 (30%) max: 19795 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 82% 89% 100% 100% 90%
min: 23308 avg: 27794 median: 28300 (50%) max: 31045 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 67% 51% 57% 72% 52% 75% 94% 100% 86% 97%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4618 avg: 6094 median: 5827 (25%) max: 7707 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 100% 79% 78% 87% 62%
min: 9449 avg: 12247 median: 12430.5 (52%) max: 14252 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 67% 41% 41% 64% 32% 66% 90% 98% 82% 100%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
2090 Points (53%)
2611 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
6317 Points (25%)
10721 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1396 avg: 1478 median: 1500 (59%) max: 1528 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 97% 100% 99% 98% 92%
min: 1596 avg: 1793 median: 1868 (73%) max: 1918 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 79% 79% 78% 88% 73% 97% 100% 83% 98%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4679 avg: 6131 median: 6006 (11%) max: 7018 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 100% 80% 87% 94% 68%
min: 10378 avg: 13176 median: 13682.5 (25%) max: 14294 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 69% 40% 43% 67% 34% 100% 98% 91% 99%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1461 Points (6%)
min: 1795 avg: 1834 median: 1848 (8%) max: 1859 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 88% 100% 99%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5961 Points (19%)
min: 10276 avg: 12524 median: 13538 (43%) max: 13757 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 59% 100% 98%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6110 Points (61%)
min: 7925 avg: 7957 median: 7932 (79%) max: 8015 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 88% 99% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
24947 Points (25%)
min: 39510 avg: 46971 median: 50218 (50%) max: 51184 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 63% 98% 100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 655 avg: 669 median: 661 (1%) max: 702 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 490 avg: 520 median: 499 (1%) max: 582 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 135.9 avg: 156.2 median: 156.2 (2%) max: 176.4 ms
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 100% 100%
min: 102.4 avg: 107.1 median: 107.1 (1%) max: 111.7 ms
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 101% 101%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 60869 avg: 63575 median: 63574.5 (53%) max: 66280 Points
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W 92% 100%
94352 Points (79%)
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 86 W 65% 70% 100%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
204 Points (57%)
min: 249 avg: 259 median: 259 (73%) max: 269 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 95% 100%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 243 avg: 250.5 median: 250 (46%) max: 259 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 96% 100% 100% 100% 97%
min: 285 avg: 303.2 median: 300 (55%) max: 331 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 59% 76% 77% 85% 75% 86% 100% 95% 87% 90%
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
43.3 MB/s (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
2539 MB/s (74%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
81.5 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
3600 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
20584 Points (85%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1285 Points (49%)
min: 1727 avg: 1945 median: 1944.5 (74%) max: 2138 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 74% 77% 85% 100% 82% 90%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 51.3 avg: 64.7 median: 65.8 (11%) max: 75.7 Watt
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 105% 100% 103%
min: 82.3 avg: 117 median: 117.5 (20%) max: 174.7 Watt
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 130% 123% 129% 122% 112% 115% 113% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 66.4 avg: 81.5 median: 81.9 (15%) max: 95.9 Watt
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 106% 100% 105%
min: 77.7 avg: 130.6 median: 138.5 (25%) max: 166 Watt
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 126% 118% 125% 123% 106% 108% 100% 100%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
20 Watt (13%)
min: 13.2 avg: 38.1 median: 38.1 (25%) max: 63 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 153% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.8 avg: 17.3 median: 16.9 (13%) max: 19.2 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W 100% 82% 88%
min: 17.2 avg: 20.7 median: 20.6 (15%) max: 25.4 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 38 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 76% 84% 67% 100% 76% 85% 68% 69%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11400H → 100% n=54 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900HK → 158% n=54
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 14. 21:51:12
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 13147 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 14041 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731617472s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13147 +0.002s ... 0.005s
#8 got single benchmarks 13147 +0.002s ... 0.007s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14041 +0.004s ... 0.012s
#10 got single benchmarks 14041 +0.016s ... 0.028s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.056s ... 0.084s
#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.087s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte