Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-1115G4 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6500

Intel Core i3-1115G4

► remove from comparison Intel i3-1115G4

Der Intel Core i3-1115G4 ist ein sparsamer Dual-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Tiger-Lake-Architektur basiert und im September 2020 vorgestellt wurde. Tiger Lake wird im verbesserten 10nm+-Verfahren (SuperFin genannt) bei Intel gefertigt und nutzt die neuen Willow Cove CPU-Kerne mit einer neuen Mikroarchitektur. Der Intel Core i5-1115G4 bietet zwei Kerne mit Hyperthreading (4 Threads) und 3 GHz Basistakt bis 4,1 GHz Turbo-Takt (auch wenn beide Kerne genutzt werden). 

Eine weitere Neuerung ist die integrierte Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 Grafikkarte (Gen 12) welche eine deutlich höhere Leistung wie die alte Iris Plus G7 in Ice Lake bieten soll. Im 1115G7 bietet die UHD Graphics jedoch nur 48 der 96 EUs bei einem Takt von 400 - 1250 MHz.

Wie bisher wird auch weiterhin WLAN (Wifi 6) und nun auch Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 und 4 Lanes PCIe 4 im Chip (teil-)integriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks.

Der TDP kann bei den UP3 CPUs von 12 - 28 Watt gewählt werden und dadurch eignet sich die CPU auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks.

Intel Core 2 Duo T6500

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2.1 GHz relativ langsam getaktet. Im Vergleich zum vergleichbaren T6570, bietet der T6500 jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

show full text
ModelIntel Core i3-1115G4Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3Penryn
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 « 3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 « 2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock3000 - 4100 MHz2100 MHz
L1 Cache160 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 2
TDP28 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm45 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1449PGA478
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-3733 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
FSB800
Transistors410 Million
Die Size107 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-1115G4
29.1 pt (48%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -92%
...
Intel Core i7-10810U
28.4 -2%
Intel Core i7-8665U
28.4 -2%
Intel Core i7-10610U
28.5 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
28.5 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
28.5 -2%
Intel Core i7-10510U
28.6 -2%
Intel Core i7-8750H
28.7 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U
28.8 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
28.9 -1%
Intel Core i3-1115G4
29.1
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
29.2 0%
Intel Core i7-10710U
29.2 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
29.3 1%
Intel Core i7-8850H
29.4 1%
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
29.5 1%
Intel Core i5-10300H
29.7 2%
Intel Core i7-1180G7
29.8 2%
Intel Core i5-10400H
29.8 2%
Intel Core i7-9750H
29.9 3%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 63%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 107%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2725     avg: 3038     median: 3125 (3%)     max: 3244 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1242     avg: 1299     median: 1312 (56%)     max: 1319 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 504     avg: 507     median: 504.5 (56%)     max: 515 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 961     avg: 1120     median: 1114 (3%)     max: 1251 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 384.7     avg: 461.6     median: 480.5 (3%)     max: 507 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 137     avg: 179.9     median: 190 (53%)     max: 197 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8018 Points (48%)
min: 2197     avg: 2283     median: 2249 (14%)     max: 2487 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
16265 Points (12%)
min: 3800     avg: 4254     median: 4262 (3%)     max: 4757 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
412.8 s (5%)
min: 1158     avg: 1172     median: 1171.5 (14%)     max: 1185 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.8 s (2%)
min: 36.5     avg: 36.9     median: 37.1 (7%)     max: 37.24 s
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 11122     avg: 12669     median: 12919.5 (7%)     max: 13422 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4497     avg: 4586     median: 4599.5 (54%)     max: 4674 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
26.2 fps (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
141.6 fps (33%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.25     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (7%)     max: 4.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.8 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2408 Seconds (31%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 940     avg: 1037     median: 1021.5 (7%)     max: 1188 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.636     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.671 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6331 Points (13%)
min: 1768     avg: 1856     median: 1879 (4%)     max: 1887 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.2 s (2%)
min: 22     avg: 24.2     median: 24.5 (5%)     max: 25.58 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.4 s (1%)
min: 54     avg: 58.3     median: 58.5 (3%)     max: 62.3 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
434.8 s (2%)
min: 1339     avg: 1348     median: 1341 (6%)     max: 1363 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T6500 +
19458 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T6500 +
15381 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 4087     avg: 4922     median: 5278 (11%)     max: 5522 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 5     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (73%)     max: 5.1 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
16869 Points (13%)
min: 3945     avg: 4015     median: 4014.5 (3%)     max: 4084 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5128     avg: 5771     median: 5579.5 (14%)     max: 6640 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 57115     avg: 59888     median: 60028 (49%)     max: 62520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 48647     avg: 55626     median: 56348 (46%)     max: 61883 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 65022     avg: 65592     median: 65591.5 (54%)     max: 66161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3986     avg: 4871     median: 5038 (13%)     max: 5250 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6125     avg: 7184     median: 7331.5 (13%)     max: 7786 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2227     avg: 2623     median: 2635 (11%)     max: 2937 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5487 Points (52%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1190     avg: 1296     median: 1311.5 (51%)     max: 1352 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2341     avg: 2628     median: 2605 (5%)     max: 2983 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1328 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2399 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5601 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9945 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 657.9     avg: 749     median: 755 (1%)     max: 805 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
145.8 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 49170     avg: 55606     median: 58151 (48%)     max: 59497 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
152.3 Points (43%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 200     avg: 213.7     median: 204.5 (38%)     max: 257 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
20509 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
11801 Points (43%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 950     avg: 1029     median: 1033 (40%)     max: 1094 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
147 Points (81%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.7     avg: 36.1     median: 35.2 (6%)     max: 44.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.6     avg: 36.3     median: 39.1 (7%)     max: 41.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
22.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.66     avg: 6.2     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 7.67 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.1     avg: 13.5     median: 12.8 (10%)     max: 16.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-1115G4 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 → 30% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 19. 10:11:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12242 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 453 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734599484s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:18:43 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12242 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 12242 +0.022s ... 0.032s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 453 +0.001s ... 0.033s

#10 got single benchmarks 453 +0.014s ... 0.046s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.035s ... 0.081s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.083s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)