Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10110Y vs Intel Celeron N5095A

Intel Core i3-10110Y

Intel i3-10110Y

Der Intel Core i3-10110Y ist ein extrem sparsamer Dual-Core-SoC für Tablets und (passiv) gekühlte Notebooks, der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur (CML-Y) basiert und Ende August 2019 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU integriert zwei Prozessorkerne, die mit 1 bis 4 GHz takten (2-Kern-Turbo 3,7 GHz). Dank Hyper-Threading kann der Prozessor acht Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Weiterhin integriert der Chip eine Intel UHD Graphics 615 Grafikkarte (max 1 GHz), einen Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller (LPDDR3-2133) sowie VP9- und H.265-Videode- und -encoder. Die Fertigung erfolgt weiterhin in einem 14-Nanometer-Prozess mit FinFET-Transistoren. Im Vergleich zu den technisch identischen Amber Lake und Kaby-Lake-Y-Vorgängern (z.B. Core i7-7Y75), bietet der i3-10110Y weiterhin nur 2 der 4 Kerne (in den stärkeren i5 und i7 verfügbar) bei relativ hohen Taktraten.

Mehr Informationen über die Comet Lake Architektur und die verfügbaren Prozessoren finden Sie auf unserer Themenseite über Comet Lake.

Performance

Der Core i3-10110Y ist der schwächste Comet-Lake-Y in 2019 und bietet nur zwei Kerne. Im Vergleich zu dem alten Core m3-8100Y Vorgänger (Amber Lake Y), kann sich der i3-10110Y jedoch durch die hohe Turbo Taktrate von 4 GHz deutlich absetzen. Hierfür benötigt er jedoch auch deutlich mehr Strom (7 W TDP versus 5 Watt) und hat eine verringerten garantierten Basistakt. Daher wird die Performance noch deutlich mehr von der Kühlung und den TDP Einstellungen im BIOS abhängen. Kurze Bursts und Lasten sind aber zweifelsohne eine Stärke der CPU. Bei längeren Lasten sollte der sparsamere 10nm Prozess in den modernen Ice Lake Prozessoren der 10. Generation (z.B. Core i3-1000G1) hier aber zu einer besseren Performance helfen. Ausserdem ist die integrierte Grafikkarte bei Ice Lake deutlich schneller und moderner.

Der TDP kann beim i3-10110Y von 5,5 - 9 Watt eingestellt werden vom Notebookhersteller (Default 7 Watt). Je nach gewählter Einstellung ist besonders bei längeren Lastphasen mit unterschiedlicher Performance zu rechnen. Interessanterweise, erlaubt Intel die geringste Einstellung von 4,5 Watt nur mit zwei der schnelleren Quad-Core Modelle, wie dem Core i5-10210Y, der sich dadurch besser für eine passive Kühlung eignen könnte.

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Core i3-10110YIntel Celeron N5095A
SeriesIntel Amber LakeIntel Jasper Lake
CodenameAmber Lake-YJasper Lake
Serie: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Core i5-10310Y compare1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y compare1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y compare1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y « 1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y compare1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y compare1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y compare1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1000 - 4000 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP7 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1377BGA1338
FeaturesDDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-2133 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 1000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
996 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
1633 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10110Y → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 19. 17:37:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11469 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726760239s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:16:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11469 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 11469 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.016s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.017s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.019s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)