Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10100Y vs Intel Celeron N5095A

Intel Core i3-10100Y

Intel i3-10100Y

Der Intel Core i3-10100Y ist ein extrem sparsamer Dual-Core-SoC für Tablets und passiv gekühlte Notebooks, der auf der Amber-Lake-Architektur basiert und Ende im Q1 2021 vorgestellt wurde. Bis auf die leicht höher getaktete iGPU (+50 MHz) ist der i3-10100Y identisch zum alten Core i5-8200Y aus 2018.

Die CPU integriert 2 Prozessorkerne, die mit 1,3 bis 3,9 GHz takten. Dank Hyper-Threading kann der Prozessor vier Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Weiterhin integriert der Chip eine Intel UHD Graphics 615 Grafikkarte, einen Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) sowie VP9- und H.265-Videode- und -encoder. Die Fertigung erfolgt im verbesserten 14-Nanometer-Prozess mit FinFET-Transistoren (14nm+ wie Kaby-Lake-R). 

Architektur

Im Vergleich mit Skylake und Kaby Lake hat Intel die zugrundeliegende Mikroarchitektur praktisch unverändert übernommen, sodass sich keine Unterschiede in der Pro-MHz-Leistung ergeben. Der gereifte 14-Nanometer-Prozess (14nm+) erlaubt jedoch höhere Frequenzen.

Performance

Durch den sehr niedrigen TDP bietet die Y-Serie nicht das Leistungsniveau der anderen Core-i-Prozessoren. Zwar kann der i3-10100Y bzw. 8200Y durch seinen hohen Turbo-Takt bei kurzzeitigen Lastspitzen und Single-Thread-Anwendungen gelegentlich mit Modellen der 15-Watt-Serie (aus 2018) mithalten, wird bei Dauerbelastung jedoch merkliche Takt- und Leistungseinbrüche zeigen. Dennoch ist die CPU für viele anspruchsvollere Anwendungen sowie Multitasking geeignet. Die Performance hängt jedoch stark von der Kühlung im verbauten Notebook und den TDP-Einstellungen (Limit) ab. Die Unterschiede zwischen dem Pentium Gold 6500Y (m3-8100Y) und i3-10100Y (i5-8200Y) können daher nur gering sein.

Grafikeinheit

Die integrierte Intel UHD Graphics 615 Grafikkarte wurde im Vergleich zur HD Graphics 615 nicht verändert und bietet weiterhin 24 Ausführungseinheiten (EUs) und eine Taktrate von 300 (Basis, garantiert) bis 1000 MHz (maximaler Boost). Die Performance hängt stark von der eingestellten TDP sowie dem verwendeten Arbeitsspeicher ab. Mehr Informationen hierzu finden Sie auf der UHD 615 GPU-Seite.

Anders als Skylake kann Kaby Lake und Amber Lake nun auch H.265/HEVC im Main10-Profil mit 10 Bit Farbtiefe sowie Googles VP9-Codec in Hardware decodieren.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Fertigung erfolgt in der 2. Generation des 14-Nanometer-Prozesses (14nm+) mit FinFET-Transistoren (kein 14nm++). Die TDP wird nun mit 5 Watt spezifiziert (Kaby-Lake-Y noch 4,5 Watt) und kann je nach Einsatzzweck nach oben oder unten variiert werden.

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Core i3-10100YIntel Celeron N5095A
SeriesIntel Amber LakeIntel Jasper Lake
CodenameAmber Lake-YJasper Lake
Serie: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Core i5-10310Y compare1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y compare1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y compare1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y compare1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y compare1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y « 1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y compare1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y compare1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1300 - 3900 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP5 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1377BGA1338
FeaturesDDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 1000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10100Y
22.3 pt (37%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1375 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
788 Points (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
303 Points (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
536 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
220 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
122 Points (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5292 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9659 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
632 s (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
16 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1683 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
8262 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3535 MIPS (42%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.8 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1825 Seconds (13%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1 sec (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
667 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
3210 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
986 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
1889 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4359 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7643 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1246 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
34086 Points (30%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
148 Points (31%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
18.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
20.7 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10100Y → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 20. 05:59:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13831 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726804780s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:16:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13831 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 13831 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.016s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.034s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.036s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)