Notebookcheck Logo

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs UNISOC Tiger T310

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

UNISOC Tiger T310

► remove from comparison UNISOC T310

Der Unisoc Tiger T310 ist ein Prozessor der Einstiegsklasse mit einem schnellen ARM Cortex-A75-Kern und bis zu 2 GHz Taktrate. Die zusätzlichen 3 Cortex-A55-Stromsparkerne takten mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. 

Das SoC integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und unterstützt maximal zwei Kameras mit 16 und 8 Megapixel, sowie die Full-HD-Videoaufzeichnung mit maximal 30 fps.

Der Speicherkontroller kann mit LPDDR4x zusammenarbeiten, liefert dabei allerdings maximal eine Taktrate von 1333 MHz. Als Massenspeicher wird eMMC 5.1 unterstützt.

Die integrierte PowerVR GE8300 Grafikkarte bietet eine Taktrate von maximal 800 MHz und steuert den Bildschirm mit bis zu 1.600 x 720 Pixel Auflösung an.

Das SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

show full text
ModelWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950UNISOC Tiger T310
Series UNISOC
CodenameCortex-A9
Serie:
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Google Tensor G4 compare1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 « 1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
Clock1000 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 14 / 4
iGPUARM Mali-400 MPPowerVR GE8300 ( - 800 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.twwww.unisoc.com
Technology12 nm
FeaturesLTE Cat.7, BT 5.0, WiFi ac, GNSS, eMMC 5.1, LPDDR3 933, LPDDR4x 1333 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T310 +
1588 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T310 +
1590 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T310 +
376 Points (15%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T310 +
756 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T310 +
1687 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T310 +
2969 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T310 +
2987 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T310 +
1656 Points (25%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 T310 +
3239 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 WM8950 +
2410 ms (23%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 T310 +
11986 Points (10%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T310 +
45 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 T310 +
63 Points (12%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T310 +
162595 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T310 +
57138 Points (16%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 T310 +
1653 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T310 +
9900 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 T310 +
6866 Points (29%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T310 +
3.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T310 +
1.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tiger T310 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 16. 16:53:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14530 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731772402s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.055s ... 0.055s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.055s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.055s

#8 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.003s ... 0.059s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14530 +0.001s ... 0.059s

#10 got single benchmarks 14530 +0.004s ... 0.063s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.073s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.075s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)