Notebookcheck Logo

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison  WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz

► remove from comparison  RK3066

Der Rockchip RK3066 ist ein günstiger SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er bietet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 CPU Kerne mit NEON Erweiterungen, eine ARM Mali 400MP4 (Quad-Core mit 250 MHz getaktet) Grafikkarte und einen Video De- und Encoder. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt maximal 2 GB DDR1-3.

Weitere Features lt Wikipedia

  • VPU (Video Processing Unit) Multi-Media Processor supporting 1080p image and video decoding
  • HDMI 1.4 Interface
  • 2-channels TFT LCD Interface with 5 layers and 3D Display (1920×1080 Maximum Display Size)
  • USB 2.0 Interface
  • SD/MMC Interface

ModelWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz
Series
CodenameCortex-A9
Serie:
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
Clock1000 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 12 / 2
iGPUARM Mali-400 MPARM Mali-400 MP4 (250 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.twwww.rock-chips.com
L2 Cache512 KB
Technology40 nm
FeaturesMali-400 MP4, Single Channel DDR3 Memory Controller

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 RK3066 +
min: 4687     avg: 4990     median: 5059 (4%)     max: 5161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 RK3066 +
4890 Points (4%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
2410 ms (23%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3066 +
1959 ms (21%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
1282 Points (8%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 RK3066 +
5852 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz → 214% n=5

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 17. 00:47:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3576 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726526874s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 05:16:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.05s ... 0.05s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.051s

#8 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.003s ... 0.054s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3576 +0.001s ... 0.055s

#10 got single benchmarks 3576 +0.008s ... 0.062s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.071s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.073s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)