Notebookcheck Logo

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz vs NXP i.MX 6SLL

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison

NXP i.MX 6SLL

► remove from comparison i.MX 6SLL

Der NXP i.MX 6SLL oder i.MX6SLL (i.MX 6 Series, MCIMX6V7DVN10AB Part Number) ist ein low-End Single-Core-Chip für e-Reader. Er integriert einen einzelnen ARM Cortex-A9 Kern mit bis zu 1 GHz Taktfrequenz und einen Grafikkarte mit 2D Beschleunigung namens Pixel Processor PXP (inkl. E-INK Display Controller EPDC mit bis zu 2332x1650 5 Bit Graustufen-Support). Der integrierte Speichercontroller kann laut NXP mit 400 MHz LPDDR2 und LPDDR3 umgehen (32 Bit Interface). Festspeicher kann durch die drei Verbindungen mit eMMC 5.0 oder SD 3.0 angebunden werden. Ausserdem können 2x USB 2.0 OTG mit PHY nach aussen geführt werden. WLAN, Bluetooth, GPS und Camera Sensoren müssen durch externe Chips angebunden werden.

Der i.MX 6SLL ist Pin-kompatibel mit dem i.MX 6SoloLite.

show full text
ModelWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHzNXP i.MX 6SLL
Series
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9
Serie: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1000 MHz1200 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 11 / 1
iGPUARM Mali-400 MPVivante GC800NXP PXP
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.twwww.nxp.com
Technology55 nm40 nm
FeaturesVivante GC800, DDR1-3 memory controller, hardware video en- and decoder32-Bit DRAM Controller 400 MHz LPDDR2/LPDDR3, E-INK Display Controller, 2D Graphics Acceleration, eMMC 5.0, USB 2.0 OTG
L1 Cache64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB

Benchmarks

Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
14.3 MFLOPS (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 WM8950 +
2410 ms (23%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
6771 ms (74%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
1249 points (3%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks NXP i.MX 6SLL → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 16. 20:02:39

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3317 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11524 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731783759s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3317 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#11 got single benchmarks 3317 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11524 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#13 got single benchmarks 11524 +0.003s ... 0.014s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.018s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.018s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)