Notebookcheck Logo

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7600X

Der AMD Ryzen 5 7600X ist ein der aktuelle schnellste Ryzen 5 Desktop Prozessor und gehört zur aktuellen Raphael-Serie. Der Ryzen 5 7600X besitzt 6 Kerne und bietet dank SMT insgesamt 12 Threads.

Der Ryzen 5 7600X taktet mit 4,7 GHz Basistakt und erreicht im Turbo bis zu 5,3 GHz auf einem Kern.

Die Leistung des AMD Ryzen 5 7600X ist durchweg bei allen Anwendungen hervorragend und deutlich besser als beim AMD Ryzen 5 5600X. AMD konnte vor allem die Single-Thread-Performance aufgrund der neuen, kleineren Fertigung durch höhere Taktraten und der höheren TDP deutlich steigern. Dadurch kann der AMD Ryzen 5 7600X mit einem Intel Core i5-12600K mithalten.

Die neuen Zen4-Prozessoren werden alle im 4 nm-Verfahren gefertigt, was die hohen Taktfrequenzen ermöglicht. Den Chiplet-Aufbau gibt es weiterhin, was bedeutet, dass unter dem Heatspreader zusätzlich der I/O-Die seinen Platz hat. Dieser wird hingegen nicht mehr in 12 nm produziert, sondern im kleineren 6 nm Verfahren. Zudem gibt es eine kleine iGPU welche jedoch nur für die 2D-Darstellung geeignet ist.

show full text
ModelWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
Series AMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
CodenameCortex-A9Raphael (Zen4)
Serie: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X compare4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 compare3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare3.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D compare4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X « 4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock1000 MHz4700 - 5300 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 16 / 12
iGPUARM Mali-400 MPAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.twwww.amd.com
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache6 MB
L3 Cache32 MB
TDP105 Watt
TransistorsCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million
Technology5 nm
Voltage0.650 - 1.475V V
Die Size1x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 7600X
44.1 pt (73%)
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
44.1
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 36%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15006     avg: 15252     median: 15236 (14%)     max: 15510 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1953     avg: 1964     median: 1965 (84%)     max: 1967 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 759     avg: 761     median: 761 (84%)     max: 764 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5882     avg: 5973     median: 5966 (15%)     max: 6076 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2434     avg: 2504     median: 2517 (16%)     max: 2536 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 311     avg: 313.7     median: 314 (88%)     max: 315 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.79     avg: 28.3     median: 28.3 (37%)     max: 28.69 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.68     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.72 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8212     avg: 8455     median: 8480 (51%)     max: 8631 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 48381     avg: 49427     median: 49430 (36%)     max: 49837 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 88546     avg: 90010     median: 90309 (58%)     max: 91222 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15797     avg: 15925     median: 15948 (19%)     max: 16010 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 74.491     avg: 78.5     median: 78.8 (1%)     max: 82.19 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.709     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 2.933 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16178 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 65569     avg: 68816     median: 69291 (40%)     max: 70615 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7661     avg: 7993     median: 8058 (95%)     max: 8101 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
147.8 fps (49%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
367 fps (85%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.2     avg: 20.9     median: 21 (37%)     max: 21.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13.2 GB/s (34%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 322     avg: 329.6     median: 328 (4%)     max: 344 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 202     avg: 206.1     median: 205 (1%)     max: 214 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3726     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.395 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 16979     avg: 17291     median: 17290.5 (37%)     max: 17602 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
367.1 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82479     avg: 83000     median: 82999.5 (64%)     max: 83520 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 25396     avg: 25731     median: 25731 (65%)     max: 26066 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 92244     avg: 98319     median: 98318.5 (80%)     max: 104393 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 92907     avg: 98466     median: 98466 (80%)     max: 104025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 94868     avg: 99772     median: 99772 (83%)     max: 104676 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 19327     avg: 19377     median: 19377 (49%)     max: 19427 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 30671     avg: 30681     median: 30681 (55%)     max: 30691 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10458     avg: 10645     median: 10645 (45%)     max: 10832 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2159     avg: 2212     median: 2217 (87%)     max: 2230 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11093     avg: 11914     median: 12003 (22%)     max: 12185 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2070     avg: 2120     median: 2126 (9%)     max: 2137 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11123     avg: 11886     median: 11982 (38%)     max: 12112 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8596     avg: 8967     median: 9021 (90%)     max: 9048 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 45422     avg: 47461     median: 47694 (48%)     max: 48205 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 441     avg: 447.8     median: 448 (1%)     max: 451 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 WM8950 +
2410 ms (23%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 295     avg: 298.3     median: 298 (83%)     max: 302 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 356     avg: 373.3     median: 370.5 (68%)     max: 395 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2104     avg: 2186     median: 2193 (84%)     max: 2256 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
227 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
215 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
91.5 Watt (61%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
11.7 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 7600X → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 17. 12:51:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14615 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731844312s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.028s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.029s

#8 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14615 +0.007s ... 0.039s

#10 got single benchmarks 14615 +0.009s ... 0.048s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.074s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.077s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)