Notebookcheck Logo

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs Apple A18

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

Apple A18

► remove from comparison Apple A18

the A18 scores 8085, while the A18 Pro earns a score of 8408

show full text
ModelWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950Apple A18
Series Apple
CodenameCortex-A9
Serie:
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Apple A18 « - 3.8 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A18 Pro compare - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
Clock1000 MHz <=3800 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 16 / 6
2 x Apple A18 P-Core
4 x 3.8 GHz Apple A18 E-Core
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.tw
TDP Turbo PL210 Watt
Technology3 nm
Features16-core Neural Engine, USB 2.0 (480 Mbps)

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
3149 Points (85%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
7663 Points (30%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2327 Points (92%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
6130 Points (11%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
290.2 ms (0%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 WM8950 +
2410 ms (23%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
90158 Points (79%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
263 Points (76%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
12600 Points (2%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1407 Points (54%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
4.9 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
0.9 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 28. 04:16:46

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18007 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1727489805s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Sep 2024 05:16:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.051s ... 0.051s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.051s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.052s

#8 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.003s ... 0.055s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18007 +0s ... 0.056s

#10 got single benchmarks 18007 +0.001s ... 0.057s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.057s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.057s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.057s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.058s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.059s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.06s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.06s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.061s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.061s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.062s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.062s

#23 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.062s

#24 return log +0.002s ... 0.064s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)