Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs unknown vs UNISOC Tiger T310
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ist eine High-End-CPU der Meteor-Lake-H-Serie die im Dezember 2023 vorgestellt wurde. Der SoC setzt zum ersten Mal auf ein Tile/Chiplet-Design. Der Compute-Tile bietet 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Redwood Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Crestmont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 22 Threads) und takten bis 5,1 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten mit maximal 3,8 GHz. Zusätzlich gibt es nun noch zwei weitere Low-Power-Efficiency-Kerne auf der Low-Power-Island, im Leerlauf und bei einfachen Aufgaben kann der Compute-Tile daher komplett deaktiviert werden, um Strom zu sparen.
Performance
Mit Meteor-Lake-P wird die bisherige Architektur weiter verbessert, es gibt aber keine grundlegenden Änderungen. Die Leistung ist daher auch nur geringfügig höher als bei den Raptor-Lake-Prozessoren. Im Vergleich zum Core Ultra 7 165H , bietet der U9 185H nur einen 100 MHz höheren Boost takt der CPU und 50 MHz bei der iGPU.
Grafikeinheit
Der Core Ultra 9 185H bietet eine neue ARC-iGPU mit 8 Xe-Kernen und 128 EUs, die maximal 2,35 GHz erreichen. Die Leistung gegenüber der alten Iris Xe Graphics G7 mit 96 EUs konnte ungefähr verdoppelt werden.
Features
Meteor Lake-H hat WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) integriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt jetzt LPDDR5/x-7467 (max. 64 GB) oder DDR5-5600 (max. 96 GB). Es kommt nun eine dedizierte NPU (2x Gen3 Neural Compute Engines) zum Einsatz. Die Xe Media Engine unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode bis zu 8K 10-Bit HDR. Der Chip unterstützt jetzt PCIe-5.0 (x8 für GPU) und PCIe-4.0 (drei x12 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ist mit 28 Watt TDP (Base) und 64 Watt bzw. 115 Watt (PL2) max. Turbo Power angegeben. Meteor Lake besteht aus fünf einzelnen Chips, wobei der Prozessorteil im neuen Intel 4 Prozess (7nm) gefertigt wird. Die Grafikeinheit wird bei TSMC in N5 produziert und SoC und I/O-Tile im älteren N6 Prozess. Diese 4 Chips werden dann per Foveros-Verfahren auf den 22nm Base-Tile aufgebracht.
UNISOC Tiger T310 ► remove from comparison
Der Unisoc Tiger T310 ist ein Prozessor der Einstiegsklasse mit einem schnellen ARM Cortex-A75-Kern und bis zu 2 GHz Taktrate. Die zusätzlichen 3 Cortex-A55-Stromsparkerne takten mit bis zu 1,8 GHz.
Das SoC integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und unterstützt maximal zwei Kameras mit 16 und 8 Megapixel, sowie die Full-HD-Videoaufzeichnung mit maximal 30 fps.
Der Speicherkontroller kann mit LPDDR4x zusammenarbeiten, liefert dabei allerdings maximal eine Taktrate von 1333 MHz. Als Massenspeicher wird eMMC 5.1 unterstützt.
Die integrierte PowerVR GE8300 Grafikkarte bietet eine Taktrate von maximal 800 MHz und steuert den Bildschirm mit bis zu 1.600 x 720 Pixel Auflösung an.
Das SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt.
Model Intel Core Ultra 9 185H unknown UNISOC Tiger T310 Series Intel Meteor Lake-H UNISOC Codename Meteor Lake-H Serie: Clock 3800 - 5100 MHz 1800 - 2000 MHz L3 Cache 24 MB Cores / Threads 16 / 22 4 / 4 TDP 45 Watt Technology 7 nm 12 nm max. Temp. 110 °C Socket BGA2049 Features DDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA LTE Cat.7, BT 5.0, WiFi ac, GNSS, eMMC 5.1, LPDDR3 933, LPDDR4x 1333 MHz iGPU Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)PowerVR GE8300 ( - 800 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 ARM Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com www.unisoc.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
39.3 pt (65%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 103 avg: 108 median: 108 (62%) max: 112.2 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W 97% 100% 95% 98%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 828 avg: 1003 median: 1021 (19%) max: 1096 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W 82% 100% 99% 96%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12688 avg: 17979 median: 18473 (17%) max: 19851 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 96% 64% 85% 86% 94% 78% 97% 100% 97% 93% 90% 92%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1620 avg: 1827 median: 1838 (78%) max: 1912 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 98% 95% 94% 93% 98% 80% 97% 100% 94% 97% 100% 85%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 622 avg: 704 median: 709 (79%) max: 735 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 98% 94% 94% 93% 98% 80% 96% 100% 97% 97% 100% 85%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4843 avg: 6914 median: 7194 (18%) max: 7651 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 95% 63% 84% 84% 96% 79% 97% 100% 97% 94% 88% 93%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1581.9 avg: 2739 median: 2801.5 (18%) max: 3165 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 75% 73% 87% 89% 89% 76% 100% 95% 94% 90% 86% 90%
min: 1029 avg: 1038 median: 1038 (7%) max: 1047 Points
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown Win10 1029 Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown macOS 1047
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 58% 73% 87% 89% 89% 76% 100% 95% 94% 90% 86% 90%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 238 avg: 267.1 median: 268 (75%) max: 281 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 98% 93% 93% 91% 97% 84% 96% 100% 95% 97% 100% 85%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 33.95 avg: 34.6 median: 34.3 (44%) max: 35.55 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 97% 95% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.11 avg: 3.2 median: 3.1 (74%) max: 3.27 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 96% 100% 95%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9719 avg: 10069 median: 10188 (62%) max: 10300 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 94% 100% 99%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 59935 avg: 62161 median: 61959 (45%) max: 64588 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 96% 93% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 88902 avg: 90478 median: 90978 (58%) max: 91553 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 100% 97% 99%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13997 avg: 14232 median: 14325 (17%) max: 14374 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 97% 100% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 91.954 avg: 247.6 median: 228.6 (3%) max: 441.275 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 102% 103% 100% 104%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.254 avg: 4.6 median: 3.5 (1%) max: 8.1 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 100% 101% 101% 101%
min: 6724 avg: 10271 median: 8251.5 (13%) max: 17856 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 100% 48% 44% 38%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 52522 avg: 69758 median: 71843 (41%) max: 76331 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 95% 69% 84% 89% 96% 81% 97% 100% 99% 95% 93% 88%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4502 avg: 5455 median: 5539.5 (65%) max: 5781 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 98% 97% 98% 95% 98% 86% 86% 100% 95% 94% 94% 78%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 158.2 avg: 161.8 median: 161.5 (54%) max: 165.6 fps
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 98% 96% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 300.5 avg: 324.2 median: 335.5 (77%) max: 336.5 fps
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 100% 100% 89%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.1 avg: 20.1 median: 20.8 (37%) max: 22.7 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 94% 62% 79% 76% 95% 80% 97% 100% 98% 92% 91% 91%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.96 avg: 1.1 median: 1.1 (32%) max: 1.1 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 87% 100% 100% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4 avg: 1.7 median: 1.8 (31%) max: 1.9 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 74% 100% 95% 95%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9 avg: 10.5 median: 11.2 (29%) max: 11.6 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 68% 95% 97% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 280 avg: 335.1 median: 305.5 (4%) max: 538 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 103% 100% 102% 103% 103% 102% 102% 103% 103% 103% 103% 103%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 163 avg: 190.5 median: 177 (1%) max: 285 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 101% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4313 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (10%) max: 0.503 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 104% 104% 104% 103% 104% 100% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 103%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9854 avg: 13246 median: 13162 (28%) max: 15529 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 85% 87% 75% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.6 avg: 6.8 median: 6.8 (1%) max: 7.256 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 14.879 avg: 15 median: 14.9 (1%) max: 15.15 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 304.446 avg: 358 median: 366.9 (2%) max: 402.742 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 100% 100% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74020 avg: 77177 median: 76132 (58%) max: 80494 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 94% 92% 100% 99%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12693 avg: 21045 median: 21875 (55%) max: 24629 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 89% 52% 73% 80% 91% 98% 100% 98% 84% 81% 90%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74638 avg: 81122 median: 75478 (61%) max: 100241 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 80% 74% 75% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 73618 avg: 80933 median: 75417 (61%) max: 100192 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 80% 74% 75% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78677 avg: 88691 median: 90339.5 (75%) max: 102469 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 82% 89% 83% 100%
37732 Points (31%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 37732
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 67% 89% 83% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16393 avg: 19079 median: 18881 (48%) max: 21267 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 94% 79% 86% 95% 100%
8923 Points (23%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 8923
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 77% 79% 86% 95% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21106 avg: 27722 median: 28264 (50%) max: 30623 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 95% 69% 79% 87% 91% 82% 99% 96% 100% 95% 89% 95%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6307 avg: 10856 median: 11481 (48%) max: 12209 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 92% 52% 78% 86% 97% 78% 99% 96% 100% 89% 82% 97%
5039 Points (21%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 5039
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 79% 52% 78% 86% 97% 78% 99% 96% 100% 89% 82% 97%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1588 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1590 Points (18%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2199 avg: 2489 median: 2503 (66%) max: 2573 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 99% 97% 97% 93% 98% 77% 98% 100% 97% 97% 100% 85%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 12825 avg: 13796 median: 13973 (55%) max: 14540 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 100% 92% 95% 96% 93% 81% 97% 96% 97% 94% 98% 88%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1700 avg: 1841 median: 1857 (73%) max: 1902 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 97% 95% 97% 92% 98% 72% 98% 100% 98% 98% 98% 89%
376 Points (15%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 58% 95% 97% 92% 98% 72% 98% 100% 98% 98% 98% 89%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10441 avg: 13268 median: 13444 (24%) max: 14230 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 99% 73% 93% 90% 94% 81% 100% 98% 97% 95% 93% 90%
756 Points (1%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W 52% 73% 93% 90% 94% 81% 100% 98% 97% 95% 93% 90%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1797 avg: 1812 median: 1810 (8%) max: 1830 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W 98% 100% 100% 98%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13228 avg: 13581 median: 13561.5 (43%) max: 13972 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W 99% 95% 100% 95%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7328 avg: 7482 median: 7516 (75%) max: 7602 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 99% 100% 96%
1687 Points (17%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 22% 99% 100% 96%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47960 avg: 49207 median: 49737 (50%) max: 49924 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 100% 96% 100%
2969 Points (3%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 6% 100% 96% 100%
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2987 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1656 Points (25%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 12.95
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 12.8
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 494 avg: 520 median: 518 (1%) max: 594 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 14670 avg: 14812 median: 14811.5 (17%) max: 14953 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 100% 113% 113% 113% 113% 113% 113% 113% 113% 113%
3239 ms (4%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 100% 110% 110% 110% 110% 110% 110% 110% 110% 110%
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
7004 ms (66%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 7004
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 90543 avg: 95362 median: 96090 (83%) max: 98144 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 100% 92% 96% 100% 98%
min: 2672 avg: 2740 median: 2753 (2%) max: 2794 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 27% 92% 96% 100% 98%
11986 Points (10%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 24% 92% 96% 100% 98%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 237 avg: 260.9 median: 266.6 (75%) max: 271 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 100% 96% 98% 100% 97% 100% 100% 100% 94% 88%
45 Points (13%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 58% 96% 98% 100% 97% 100% 100% 100% 94% 88%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 237 avg: 280.5 median: 287 (60%) max: 301 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 95% 99% 98% 97% 96% 99% 100% 99% 89% 80%
63 Points (13%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 58% 99% 98% 97% 96% 99% 100% 99% 89% 80%
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
162595 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
57138 Points (16%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
1653 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
9900 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
6866 Points (29%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1589 avg: 1779 median: 1790 (69%) max: 1971 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 94% 89% 100% 91% 90% 94% 89% 94% 93% 82%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44.4 avg: 116.6 median: 125.2 (22%) max: 176.1 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 110% 133% 126% 117% 112% 111% 106% 109% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 88 avg: 130.9 median: 134.3 (24%) max: 171.8 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 107% 121% 119% 100% 104% 101% 113% 105%
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
9.5 Watt (4%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 9.52
3.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.1 avg: 12.3 median: 11.6 (8%) max: 21.4 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 100% 112% 109% 110% 102% 111% 109% 102% 108%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.18 avg: 13.3 median: 11.7 (13%) max: 28.8 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 131% 128% 124% 138% 100% 124% 127% 128% 128%
5.5 Watt (6%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 5.5
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 134% 128% 124% 138% 100% 124% 127% 128% 128%
1.6 Watt (2%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 138% 128% 124% 138% 100% 124% 127% 128% 128%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.8 avg: 28.2 median: 24.7 (18%) max: 67 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W 31% 100% 44% 42% 27% 29% 27% 36%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 100% n=2 Average Benchmarks unknown → 3% n=2 Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tiger T310 → 14% n=2
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 09. 02:43:36
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 14530 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731116616s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.002s ... 0.005s
#9 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.003s ... 0.009s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.01s
#11 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.119s ... 0.129s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14530 +0.001s ... 0.129s
#13 got single benchmarks 14530 +0.004s ... 0.133s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.133s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.033s ... 0.166s
#16 return log +0s ... 0.166s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte