Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs HiSilicon Hi6262
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Der Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ist eine High-End-CPU der Meteor-Lake-H-Serie die im Dezember 2023 vorgestellt wurde. Der SoC setzt zum ersten Mal auf ein Tile/Chiplet-Design. Der Compute-Tile bietet 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Redwood Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Crestmont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 22 Threads) und takten bis 5,1 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten mit maximal 3,8 GHz. Zusätzlich gibt es nun noch zwei weitere Low-Power-Efficiency-Kerne auf der Low-Power-Island, im Leerlauf und bei einfachen Aufgaben kann der Compute-Tile daher komplett deaktiviert werden, um Strom zu sparen.
Performance
Mit Meteor-Lake-P wird die bisherige Architektur weiter verbessert, es gibt aber keine grundlegenden Änderungen. Die Leistung ist daher auch nur geringfügig höher als bei den Raptor-Lake-Prozessoren. Im Vergleich zum Core Ultra 7 165H , bietet der U9 185H nur einen 100 MHz höheren Boost takt der CPU und 50 MHz bei der iGPU.
Grafikeinheit
Der Core Ultra 9 185H bietet eine neue ARC-iGPU mit 8 Xe-Kernen und 128 EUs, die maximal 2,35 GHz erreichen. Die Leistung gegenüber der alten Iris Xe Graphics G7 mit 96 EUs konnte ungefähr verdoppelt werden.
Features
Meteor Lake-H hat WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) integriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt jetzt LPDDR5/x-7467 (max. 64 GB) oder DDR5-5600 (max. 96 GB). Es kommt nun eine dedizierte NPU (2x Gen3 Neural Compute Engines) zum Einsatz. Die Xe Media Engine unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode bis zu 8K 10-Bit HDR. Der Chip unterstützt jetzt PCIe-5.0 (x8 für GPU) und PCIe-4.0 (drei x12 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ist mit 28 Watt TDP (Base) und 64 Watt bzw. 115 Watt (PL2) max. Turbo Power angegeben. Meteor Lake besteht aus fünf einzelnen Chips, wobei der Prozessorteil im neuen Intel 4 Prozess (7nm) gefertigt wird. Die Grafikeinheit wird bei TSMC in N5 produziert und SoC und I/O-Tile im älteren N6 Prozess. Diese 4 Chips werden dann per Foveros-Verfahren auf den 22nm Base-Tile aufgebracht.
Model Intel Core Ultra 9 185H HiSilicon Hi6262 Series Intel Meteor Lake-H HiSilicon Codename Meteor Lake-H Serie: Clock 3800 - 5100 MHz L3 Cache 24 MB Cores / Threads 16 / 22 TDP 45 Watt Technology 7 nm max. Temp. 110 °C Socket BGA2049 Features DDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA iGPU Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)Architecture x86 Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
44.2 pt (61%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 108 avg: 109 median: 109 (76%) max: 110 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 98% 100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 828 avg: 948 median: 947.5 (18%) max: 1067 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 78% 100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12688 avg: 17445 median: 18177 (17%) max: 19851 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 64% 77% 86% 91% 97% 100% 97% 92%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1620 avg: 1803 median: 1810.5 (77%) max: 1906 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 95% 95% 93% 97% 97% 100% 94% 85%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 622 avg: 694 median: 700.5 (78%) max: 735 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 94% 94% 93% 97% 96% 100% 97% 85%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4843 avg: 6712 median: 7138.5 (17%) max: 7651 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 63% 75% 84% 94% 97% 100% 97% 93%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1581.9 avg: 2669 median: 2777.5 (18%) max: 3165 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 65% 73% 85% 89% 87% 100% 95% 94% 90%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 238 avg: 262.8 median: 264.5 (80%) max: 280 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 93% 93% 92% 96% 96% 100% 96% 85%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
34 Points (44%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10300 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
59935 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
88902 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14374 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 292.1 avg: 366.7 median: 366.7 (4%) max: 441.275 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 65 W 102% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.254 avg: 5.7 median: 5.7 (1%) max: 8.1 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 65 W 100% 101%
min: 7940 avg: 12898 median: 12898 (20%) max: 17856 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 65 W 100% 44%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 52522 avg: 67897 median: 69924 (40%) max: 76331 MIPS
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 69% 76% 89% 94% 97% 100% 99% 88%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4502 avg: 5381 median: 5524.5 (66%) max: 5781 MIPS
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 97% 98% 95% 96% 86% 100% 95% 78%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
158.2 fps (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
335.5 fps (77%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.1 avg: 19.5 median: 20.8 (37%) max: 22.7 fps
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 62% 70% 76% 92% 97% 100% 98% 91%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.96 avg: 1 median: 1 (0%) max: 1.1 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 65 W 87% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4 avg: 1.6 median: 1.6 (28%) max: 1.8 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 65 W 78% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9 avg: 9.6 median: 9.6 (25%) max: 11.3 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 65 W 70% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 285 avg: 357.4 median: 327.5 (4%) max: 538 Seconds
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 100% 102% 103% 103% 102% 103% 103% 103%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 163 avg: 201.3 median: 190 (1%) max: 285 Seconds
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 100% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4457 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (10%) max: 0.503 sec
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 100%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9854 avg: 11420 median: 11420 (24%) max: 12986 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.6 avg: 6.7 median: 6.7 (1%) max: 6.751 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 65 W 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
304.4 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
80494 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12693 avg: 20942 median: 21875 (59%) max: 24629 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 52% 73% 80% 88% 98% 100% 98% 90%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 75240 avg: 75478 median: 75478 (61%) max: 75716 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 75340 avg: 75417 median: 75417 (61%) max: 75494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78677 avg: 84868 median: 84868 (71%) max: 91059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 17876 avg: 18479 median: 18664 (47%) max: 18896 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 65 W 95% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21106 avg: 27129 median: 27113 (48%) max: 30623 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 69% 78% 87% 87% 99% 96% 100% 95%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6307 avg: 10831 median: 11696 (49%) max: 12209 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 52% 77% 86% 96% 99% 96% 100% 97%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2199 avg: 2459 median: 2499 (67%) max: 2570 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 97% 98% 93% 97% 98% 100% 98% 86%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 12825 avg: 13697 median: 13864 (55%) max: 14160 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 94% 97% 99% 94% 100% 99% 100% 91%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1700 avg: 1825 median: 1847.5 (78%) max: 1902 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 95% 97% 92% 98% 98% 100% 98% 89%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10441 avg: 13019 median: 13109 (23%) max: 14230 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 73% 90% 90% 94% 100% 98% 97% 90%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1821 avg: 1826 median: 1825.5 (8%) max: 1830 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 83 W 100% 100%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13228 avg: 13600 median: 13600 (43%) max: 13972 Points
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 83 W 95% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7602 Points (76%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
47960 Points (53%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 494 avg: 524 median: 517 (1%) max: 594 ms
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 90543 avg: 94193 median: 93980 (83%) max: 98055 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 80 W 92% 96% 100%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 237 avg: 260.6 median: 267.3 (77%) max: 269 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 96% 99% 100% 93% 100% 100% 100% 88%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 237 avg: 281.5 median: 292 (61%) max: 295 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 99% 99% 97% 89% 99% 100% 99% 80%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1589 avg: 1757 median: 1736.5 (67%) max: 1971 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 87% 100% 89% 85% 92% 87% 92% 81%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44.4 avg: 112.9 median: 125.7 (22%) max: 176.1 Watt
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 133% 128% 119% 112% 111% 106% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 88 avg: 138.3 median: 154.9 (28%) max: 171.8 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 121% 122% 100% 104% 101% 105%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.87 avg: 11.2 median: 11.4 (8%) max: 19.2 Watt
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 110% 106% 105% 100% 109% 107% 106%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 11.7 avg: 15.4 median: 13.1 (14%) max: 28.8 Watt
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 105 W 128% 124% 100% 124% 127% 128%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.8 avg: 30.5 median: 24.3 (18%) max: 67 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W 100% 44% 47% 27% 29% 27%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 0% n=
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 04. 00:49:25
#0 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 13241 +0s ... 0s
#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720046965 +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#4 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.033s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.005s ... 0.038s
#7 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.018s ... 0.056s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13241 +0.001s ... 0.057s
#9 got single benchmarks 13241 +0.003s ... 0.06s
#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.06s
#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.091s
#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.093s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte