Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 vs Intel Core 2 Duo U7500

Intel Core 2 Duo U7600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 ist ein Stromspar-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks aus 2006. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern und punktet mit 64-Bit Unterstütztung und einem TDP von lediglich 10 Watt. Mit einer maximalen Taktrate von 1.2 GHz ist er die mittlere Variante der Core 2 Duo U7000 Serie (U7500 1.1 GHz).

Intel Core 2 Duo T5470

► remove from comparison

65nm

Intel Core 2 Duo U7500

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 ist ein Stromspar-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks aus 2006. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern und punktet mit 64-Bit Unterstütztung und einem TDP von lediglich 10 Watt. Mit einer maximalen Taktrate von 1.1 GHz ist er die langsamste Variante der Core 2 Duo U7000 Serie.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo U7600Intel Core 2 Duo T5470Intel Core 2 Duo U7500
CodenameMerom-2048Merom-2048Merom-2048
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom-2048
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 « 1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 « 1.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1200 MHz1600 MHz1060 MHz
FSB533800533
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt35 Watt10 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
Voltage0.8 - 0.975V V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPBGA479PBGA479
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Intel Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 1199     avg: 1263     median: 1263 (8%)     max: 1327 Points
88%
1 U7500 +
1116 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 2260     avg: 2289     median: 2289 (2%)     max: 2318 Points
86%
1 U7500 +
1976 Points (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 61.2     avg: 68.6     median: 68.6 (14%)     max: 76 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 987     avg: 1008     median: 1008 (2%)     max: 1029 Points
min: 1353     avg: 1365     median: 1364.5 (3%)     max: 1376 Points
875 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 U7600 +
42.6 s (9%)
133%
1 T5470 +
32 s (7%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2253     avg: 2532     median: 2606 (5%)     max: 2738 Points
min: 3508     avg: 3713     median: 3713 (8%)     max: 3918 Points
min: 2094     avg: 2153     median: 2153 (4%)     max: 2212 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 U7600 +
4.4 Points (63%)
98%
1 U7500 +
4.3 Points (61%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 → 139% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 → 85% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 11. 22:19:56

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 347 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 366 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 348 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733951996s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Dec 2024 05:18:26 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 347 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#9 got single benchmarks 347 +0.007s ... 0.01s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 366 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#11 got single benchmarks 366 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 348 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#13 got single benchmarks 348 +0.005s ... 0.02s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.027s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.027s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)