Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5450

Intel Core 2 Duo U7500

Der Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 ist ein Stromspar-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks aus 2006. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern und punktet mit 64-Bit Unterstütztung und einem TDP von lediglich 10 Watt. Mit einer maximalen Taktrate von 1.1 GHz ist er die langsamste Variante der Core 2 Duo U7000 Serie.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5450

► remove from comparison

OEM Prozessor

1.0375 - 1.3 V

MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64 (Intel's x86-64 implementation), XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), LaGrande Technology (Intel Trusted Execution Technology) Virtualization Technology

Die size: 111 mm²

Steppings: L2, M0

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo U7500Intel Core 2 Duo T5450
CodenameMerom-2048Merom-2048
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom-2048
Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 compare1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 « 1.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 « 1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 compare1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1060 MHz1660 MHz
FSB533667
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm
Die Size143 mm2
SocketPBGA479
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Intel Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1116 Points (7%)
min: 1015     avg: 1504     median: 1666 (10%)     max: 1669 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
1976 Points (1%)
min: 1919     avg: 2827     median: 3121.5 (2%)     max: 3144 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
875 Points (2%)
min: 1344     avg: 1381     median: 1367 (3%)     max: 1433 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5450 +
min: 33.62     avg: 33.8     median: 33.9 (7%)     max: 34 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5450 +
15268 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5450 +
10407 MFLOPS (8%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2094     avg: 2153     median: 2153 (4%)     max: 2212 Points
min: 3322     avg: 3505     median: 3501 (7%)     max: 3813 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4.3 Points (61%)
4 Points (57%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo U7500 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5450 → 144% n=5

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 23. 10:43:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 348 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 336 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732355034s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:17:24 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 348 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#8 got single benchmarks 348 +0.006s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 336 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#10 got single benchmarks 336 +0.01s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.024s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.027s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)