Notebookcheck Logo

VIA Nano U2250 vs VIA Nano U2500

VIA Nano U2250

Der VIA Nano U2250 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für kleine Subnotebooks und Netbooks. Er steht in direkter Konkurrenz zum Intel Atom und befeuert z.b. das 12" Samsung NC20. Er taktet mit mindestens 1.3 GHZ und darf von den Notebookherstellern übertaktet werden. Im Samsung NC20 wird er z.B. mit 1.5 GHz getaktet.

Mit 10 Watt liegt der TDP deutlich über Intel Atom Prozessoren, VIA gibt jedoch einen geringen Idle Power Stromverbrauch von 200mW an.

 

VIA Nano U2500

► remove from comparison
show full text
ModelVIA Nano U2250VIA Nano U2500
CodenameIsaiahIsaiah
SeriesVIA NanoVIA Nano
Serie: Nano Isaiah
VIA Nano L2100 compare1.8 GHz1 / 1 cores
VIA Nano U2250 « 1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
VIA Nano U25001.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
VIA Nano L2100 compare1.8 GHz1 / 1 cores
VIA Nano U22501.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
VIA Nano U2500 « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1500 MHz1200 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 1
TDP10 Watt6.8 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm
SocketNanoBGA2
Features64 Bit64 Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.via.com.tw

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 U2250 +
888 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 U2250 +
174 s (35%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 U2250 +
91 s (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 U2250 +
208 s (9%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 U2250 +
4740 s (21%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 U2250 +
4562 MIPS (2%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 U2250 +
3547 MFLOPS (3%)

Average Benchmarks VIA Nano U2250 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 21. 14:38:09

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 469 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 474 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732196289s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 469 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#8 got single benchmarks 469 +0.004s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 474 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#10 got single benchmarks 474 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.01s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.013s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.016s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)