Google Tensor G4 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs unknown
Google Tensor G4 ► remove from comparison
Der Tensor G4 (Codename Zuma Pro) markiert die vierte Generation von Googles eigenen Chipsätzen für Smartphones und Tablets, die auf Android basieren. Erstmals kommt dieses SoC im Pixel 9 und Pixel 9 Pro zum Einsatz und möchten sich im Highend-Bereich angesiedelt wissen.
Die CPU des Tensor G4 setzt sich aus drei Clustern zusammen. Der erste beherbergt einen einzelnen Cortex-X4-Kern, welcher mit bis zu 3,1 GHz arbeiten kann, der zweite bietet drei Leistungskerne (Cortex-A720) mit bis zu 2,6 GHz und der dritte Cluster besitzt vier Effizienzkerne (Cortex-A520) mit bis zu 1,9 GHz. Die Taktraten sind also nicht sonderlich hoch, sodass die reine CPU-Leistung sich eher auf dem Level eines Oberklasse-SoCs bewegt.
Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine ARM Mali-G715 MP7 zum Einsatz. Im G4 wird die GPU mit 940 MHz getaktet.
Das Herzstück ist die Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), welche für die KI- beziehungsweise ML-Aufgaben zuständig ist. Auch hier bleibt Google der Öffentlichkeit genauere Angaben schuldig.
Zusätzlich integriert Google sein isoliertes Sicherheitskern-Subsystem, welches wieder den Co-Prozessor Titan M2 nutzt, und für einen zusätzlichen Schutz der eigenen Daten auf Hardwarebasis sorgt. Das externe Modem basiert auf dem Exynos 5400c und unterstützt Wi-Fi 7 und Bluetooth 5.3.
Der Tensor G4 wird im aktuellen 4nm Prozess bei Samsung hergestellt.
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ist eine High-End-CPU der Meteor-Lake-H-Serie die im Dezember 2023 vorgestellt wurde. Der SoC setzt zum ersten Mal auf ein Tile/Chiplet-Design. Der Compute-Tile bietet 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Redwood Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Crestmont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 22 Threads) und takten bis 5,1 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten mit maximal 3,8 GHz. Zusätzlich gibt es nun noch zwei weitere Low-Power-Efficiency-Kerne auf der Low-Power-Island, im Leerlauf und bei einfachen Aufgaben kann der Compute-Tile daher komplett deaktiviert werden, um Strom zu sparen.
Performance
Mit Meteor-Lake-P wird die bisherige Architektur weiter verbessert, es gibt aber keine grundlegenden Änderungen. Die Leistung ist daher auch nur geringfügig höher als bei den Raptor-Lake-Prozessoren. Im Vergleich zum Core Ultra 7 165H , bietet der U9 185H nur einen 100 MHz höheren Boost takt der CPU und 50 MHz bei der iGPU.
Grafikeinheit
Der Core Ultra 9 185H bietet eine neue ARC-iGPU mit 8 Xe-Kernen und 128 EUs, die maximal 2,35 GHz erreichen. Die Leistung gegenüber der alten Iris Xe Graphics G7 mit 96 EUs konnte ungefähr verdoppelt werden.
Features
Meteor Lake-H hat WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) integriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt jetzt LPDDR5/x-7467 (max. 64 GB) oder DDR5-5600 (max. 96 GB). Es kommt nun eine dedizierte NPU (2x Gen3 Neural Compute Engines) zum Einsatz. Die Xe Media Engine unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode bis zu 8K 10-Bit HDR. Der Chip unterstützt jetzt PCIe-5.0 (x8 für GPU) und PCIe-4.0 (drei x12 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ist mit 28 Watt TDP (Base) und 64 Watt bzw. 115 Watt (PL2) max. Turbo Power angegeben. Meteor Lake besteht aus fünf einzelnen Chips, wobei der Prozessorteil im neuen Intel 4 Prozess (7nm) gefertigt wird. Die Grafikeinheit wird bei TSMC in N5 produziert und SoC und I/O-Tile im älteren N6 Prozess. Diese 4 Chips werden dann per Foveros-Verfahren auf den 22nm Base-Tile aufgebracht.
Model Google Tensor G4 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H unknown Series Google Intel Meteor Lake-H Serie: Clock 1950 MHz 3800 - 5100 MHz Cores / Threads 8 / 8 16 / 22 Technology 4 nm 7 nm iGPU ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ( - 940 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)Architecture ARM x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer store.google.com ark.intel.com Codename Meteor Lake-H L3 Cache 24 MB TDP 45 Watt max. Temp. 110 °C Socket BGA2049 Features DDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
39.3 pt (65%)
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 103 avg: 107.9 median: 107.5 (61%) max: 112.2 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 115 W 97% 100% 95% 98% 96%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 828 avg: 1001 median: 1021 (19%) max: 1096 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 115 W 82% 100% 99% 96% 93%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12688 avg: 17954 median: 18338 (17%) max: 19851 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 96% 64% 85% 86% 94% 78% 97% 100% 97% 93% 90% 92% 89%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1620 avg: 1823 median: 1825 (78%) max: 1912 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 98% 95% 94% 93% 98% 80% 97% 100% 94% 97% 100% 85% 92%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 622 avg: 704 median: 708 (78%) max: 735 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 98% 94% 94% 93% 98% 80% 96% 100% 97% 97% 100% 85% 96%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4843 avg: 6919 median: 7192 (18%) max: 7651 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 95% 63% 84% 84% 96% 79% 97% 100% 97% 94% 88% 93% 91%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1581.9 avg: 2747 median: 2809 (18%) max: 3165 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 75% 73% 87% 89% 89% 76% 100% 95% 94% 90% 86% 90% 90%
min: 1029 avg: 1038 median: 1038 (7%) max: 1047 Points
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown Win10 1029 Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown macOS 1047
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 58% 73% 87% 89% 89% 76% 100% 95% 94% 90% 86% 90% 90%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 238 avg: 266.8 median: 268 (75%) max: 281 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 98% 93% 93% 91% 97% 84% 96% 100% 95% 97% 100% 85% 93%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 33.95 avg: 34.7 median: 34.6 (45%) max: 35.55 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 97% 95% 100% 98%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.11 avg: 3.2 median: 3.1 (75%) max: 3.27 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 96% 100% 95% 96%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9719 avg: 9994 median: 9977.5 (60%) max: 10300 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 94% 100% 99% 95%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 59935 avg: 63422 median: 63273.5 (46%) max: 67204 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 92% 89% 96% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 88902 avg: 90904 median: 91265.5 (58%) max: 92183 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 99% 96% 99% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13892 avg: 14147 median: 14161 (17%) max: 14374 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 97% 100% 100% 97%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 87.408 avg: 215.6 median: 165.1 (2%) max: 441.275 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 102% 103% 100% 104% 104%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.254 avg: 4.3 median: 3.4 (1%) max: 8.1 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 101% 101% 101% 101%
min: 6724 avg: 9769 median: 7940 (13%) max: 17856 Points
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 48% 44% 38% 43%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 52522 avg: 69756 median: 71752 (41%) max: 76331 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 95% 69% 84% 89% 96% 81% 97% 100% 99% 95% 93% 88% 91%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4502 avg: 5472 median: 5560 (66%) max: 5781 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 98% 97% 98% 95% 98% 86% 86% 100% 95% 94% 94% 78% 99%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 153.6 avg: 159.7 median: 159.9 (53%) max: 165.6 fps
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 98% 96% 100% 93%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 300.5 avg: 322.4 median: 326.3 (75%) max: 336.5 fps
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 100% 89% 94%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.1 avg: 20.1 median: 20.7 (36%) max: 22.7 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 94% 62% 79% 76% 95% 80% 97% 100% 98% 92% 91% 91% 87%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.96 avg: 1.1 median: 1.1 (32%) max: 1.3 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 74% 85% 85% 85% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4 avg: 1.8 median: 1.8 (31%) max: 2.3 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 61% 83% 78% 78% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9 avg: 10.8 median: 11.3 (29%) max: 12.1 GB/s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 65% 91% 93% 96% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 280 avg: 334.5 median: 306 (4%) max: 538 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 103% 100% 102% 103% 103% 102% 102% 103% 103% 103% 103% 103% 103%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 163 avg: 190.1 median: 177 (1%) max: 285 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 101% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4313 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (10%) max: 0.503 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 104% 104% 104% 103% 104% 100% 104% 104% 104% 104% 104% 103% 104%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9854 avg: 13153 median: 13074 (28%) max: 15529 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 85% 87% 75% 100% 82%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.6 avg: 6.8 median: 6.8 (1%) max: 7.256 s
CPU TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 14.786 avg: 14.9 median: 14.9 (1%) max: 15.15 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 304.446 avg: 358 median: 366.9 (2%) max: 402.742 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W 100% 100% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 73186 avg: 76512 median: 75742.5 (58%) max: 80494 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 94% 92% 100% 99% 91%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12693 avg: 21136 median: 21998 (56%) max: 24629 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 89% 52% 73% 80% 91% 98% 100% 98% 84% 81% 90% 92%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74638 avg: 82141 median: 75716 (62%) max: 100241 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 80% 74% 75% 100% 88%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 73618 avg: 82055 median: 75494 (61%) max: 100192 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 80% 74% 75% 100% 89%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78677 avg: 89559 median: 91059 (76%) max: 102469 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 82% 89% 83% 100% 92%
37732 Points (31%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 37732
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 67% 89% 83% 100% 92%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16393 avg: 19172 median: 18896 (48%) max: 21267 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 94% 79% 86% 95% 100% 96%
8923 Points (23%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 8923
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 77% 79% 86% 95% 100% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21106 avg: 27867 median: 28582 (51%) max: 30623 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 95% 69% 79% 87% 91% 82% 99% 96% 100% 95% 89% 95% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6307 avg: 10888 median: 11454.5 (48%) max: 12209 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 92% 52% 78% 86% 97% 78% 99% 96% 100% 89% 82% 97% 94%
5039 Points (21%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X unknown unknown 5039
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 79% 52% 78% 86% 97% 78% 99% 96% 100% 89% 82% 97% 94%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5637 Points (66%)
5778 Points (68%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 5778
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 1798 avg: 1874 median: 1874 (48%) max: 1950 Points
min: 2199 avg: 2487 median: 2500 (64%) max: 2573 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 82% 97% 97% 93% 98% 77% 98% 100% 97% 97% 100% 85% 96%
1343 Points (34%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 1343
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 74% 97% 97% 93% 98% 77% 98% 100% 97% 97% 100% 85% 96%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 4501 avg: 4621 median: 4621 (18%) max: 4741 Points
min: 12825 avg: 13800 median: 13972 (55%) max: 14540 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 56% 94% 98% 99% 95% 83% 100% 99% 100% 96% 100% 90% 98%
4370 Points (17%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 4370
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 50% 94% 98% 99% 95% 83% 100% 99% 100% 96% 100% 90% 98%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1423 Points (56%)
min: 1700 avg: 1834 median: 1856 (73%) max: 1902 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 86% 95% 97% 92% 98% 72% 98% 100% 98% 98% 98% 89% 92%
1006 Points (39%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 1006
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 75% 95% 97% 92% 98% 72% 98% 100% 98% 98% 98% 89% 92%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
3563 Points (6%)
min: 10441 avg: 13288 median: 13496 (24%) max: 14230 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 62% 73% 93% 90% 94% 81% 100% 98% 97% 95% 93% 90% 95%
3951 Points (7%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 3951
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 51% 73% 93% 90% 94% 81% 100% 98% 97% 95% 93% 90% 95%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1695 avg: 1788 median: 1799 (8%) max: 1830 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 98% 100% 100% 98% 93%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13228 avg: 13612 median: 13736 (43%) max: 13972 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 99% 95% 100% 95% 98%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6498 Points (65%)
min: 7040 avg: 7372 median: 7422 (74%) max: 7602 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 85% 99% 100% 96% 93%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15112 Points (15%)
min: 47960 avg: 49362 median: 49781.5 (50%) max: 49924 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 30% 100% 96% 100% 100%
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 12.95
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 12.8
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
745 ms (1%)
min: 494 avg: 521 median: 520 (1%) max: 594 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 836.4 avg: 10153 median: 14670 (17%) max: 14953 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 100% 107% 107% 107% 107% 107% 107% 107% 107% 107% 107%
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
7004 ms (66%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Archos Arnova 10 unknown unknown 7004
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 56737 avg: 59311 median: 59311 (49%) max: 61885 Points
min: 90543 avg: 95362 median: 96090 (80%) max: 98144 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 74% 92% 96% 100% 98%
min: 2672 avg: 13727 median: 2773.5 (2%) max: 46687 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 40% 92% 96% 100% 98%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
103 Points (29%)
min: 237 avg: 260 median: 263.3 (74%) max: 271 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 69% 96% 98% 100% 97% 100% 100% 100% 94% 88% 92%
160 Points (45%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 Chrome 130.0.6723.10212 GB 160
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 66% 96% 98% 100% 97% 100% 100% 100% 94% 88% 92%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 237 avg: 279.6 median: 286.5 (53%) max: 301 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 95% 99% 98% 97% 96% 99% 100% 99% 89% 80% 91%
200 Points (37%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 Chrome 130.0.6723.10212 GB 200
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 82% 99% 98% 97% 96% 99% 100% 99% 89% 80% 91%
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
714538 Points (43%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 714538
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
197906 Points (54%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 197906
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
55.8 MB/s (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
250 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
25 MB/s (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1592 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
28089 Points (45%)
0 Points (0%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB (!)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 13235 avg: 13592 median: 13591.5 (56%) max: 13948 Points
13858 Points (58%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 13858
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 951 avg: 1016 median: 1016 (39%) max: 1081 Points
min: 1589 avg: 1774 median: 1772 (68%) max: 1971 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 66% 89% 100% 91% 90% 94% 89% 94% 93% 82% 89%
1028 Points (39%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 1028
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 63% 89% 100% 91% 90% 94% 89% 94% 93% 82% 89%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44.4 avg: 116.6 median: 125.2 (22%) max: 176.1 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 110% 133% 126% 117% 112% 111% 106% 109% 100% 118%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 88 avg: 130.9 median: 134.3 (24%) max: 171.8 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 107% 121% 119% 100% 104% 101% 113% 105% 114%
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.43 avg: 6.9 median: 6.9 (3%) max: 7.39 Watt
9.5 Watt (4%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 9.52
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.1 avg: 12.3 median: 11.6 (8%) max: 21.4 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W TDP 115 W 100% 112% 109% 110% 102% 111% 109% 102% 108% 111%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.645 avg: 0.8 median: 0.7 (1%) max: 0.997 Watt
min: 5.18 avg: 13.3 median: 11.7 (13%) max: 28.8 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 142% 128% 124% 138% 100% 124% 127% 128% 128%
5.5 Watt (6%)
Modell CPU GPU RAM Wert Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 unknown Maleoon 910 12 GB 5.5
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 105 W 141% 128% 124% 138% 100% 124% 127% 128% 128%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.8 avg: 28.2 median: 24.7 (18%) max: 67 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 73 W TDP 80 W TDP 83 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 31% 100% 44% 42% 27% 29% 27% 36% 36%
Average Benchmarks Google Tensor G4 → 100% n=8 Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 210% n=8 Average Benchmarks unknown → 77% n=8
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 14. 04:31:49
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 18012 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731555109s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.032s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18012 +0.001s ... 0.033s
#9 got single benchmarks 18012 +0.006s ... 0.039s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.009s ... 0.048s
#11 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.032s ... 0.08s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.081s
#13 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.121s ... 0.201s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.201s
#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.056s ... 0.258s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.265s
#17 return log +0s ... 0.265s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte