Notebookcheck Logo

Google Tensor G4 vs Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz

Google Tensor G4

► remove from comparison

The Google Tensor G4 is the processor powering Pixel 9 series phones that debuted in August 2024. It certainly is well-connected, with both 5G and Wi-Fi 7 onboard. According to reports, the chip is built using one of Samsung's 4 nm processes making for decent power efficiency, as of late 2024.

The CPU part of the SoC is made up of 8 cores. The Cortex-X4 reportedly runs at 3.1 GHz and is the fastest of the bunch. Then there are also 3 Cortex-A720 cores (2.6 GHz) and 4 very frugal Cortex-A520 cores (1.95 GHz). This setup is only just enough for middling benchmark scores that are a far cry from what the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, not to mention the A18 Pro deliver.

The G715 MP7 reportedly serves as the graphics adapter.

Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz

 RK3066

Der Rockchip RK3066 ist ein günstiger SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er bietet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 CPU Kerne mit NEON Erweiterungen, eine ARM Mali 400MP4 (Quad-Core mit 250 MHz getaktet) Grafikkarte und einen Video De- und Encoder. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt maximal 2 GB DDR1-3.

Weitere Features lt Wikipedia

  • VPU (Video Processing Unit) Multi-Media Processor supporting 1080p image and video decoding
  • HDMI 1.4 Interface
  • 2-channels TFT LCD Interface with 5 layers and 3D Display (1920×1080 Maximum Display Size)
  • USB 2.0 Interface
  • SD/MMC Interface

ModelGoogle Tensor G4Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz
SeriesGoogle
Serie:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Google Tensor G4 « 1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
Clock1950 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 8
1 x ARM Cortex-A520
3 x ARM Cortex-A720
4 x ARM Cortex-X4
2 / 2
Technology4 nm40 nm
iGPUARM Mali-G715 MP7ARM Mali-400 MP4 (250 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
L2 Cache512 KB
FeaturesMali-400 MP4, Single Channel DDR3 Memory Controller
Manufacturerwww.rock-chips.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 RK3066 +
min: 4687     avg: 4990     median: 5059 (4%)     max: 5161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 RK3066 +
4890 Points (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3066 +
1959 ms (21%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 RK3066 +
min: 3105     avg: 3862     median: 3974 (9%)     max: 4257 points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 RK3066 +
5852 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 09. 04:31:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18012 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3576 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728441063s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 07 Oct 2024 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18012 +0s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 18012 +0s ... 0.004s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3576 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#10 got single benchmarks 3576 +0.009s ... 0.013s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.019s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.022s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)