Notebookcheck Logo

Google Tensor G4 vs Amlogic AML8726-MX

Google Tensor G4

► remove from comparison

The Google Tensor G4 is the processor powering Pixel 9 series phones that debuted in August 2024. It certainly is well-connected, with both 5G and Wi-Fi 7 onboard. According to reports, the chip is built using one of Samsung's 4 nm processes making for decent power efficiency, as of late 2024.

The CPU part of the SoC is made up of 8 cores. The Cortex-X4 reportedly runs at 3.1 GHz and is the fastest of the bunch. Then there are also 3 Cortex-A720 cores (2.6 GHz) and 4 very frugal Cortex-A520 cores (1.95 GHz). This setup is only just enough for middling benchmark scores that are a far cry from what the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, not to mention the A18 Pro deliver.

The G715 MP7 reportedly serves as the graphics adapter.

Amlogic AML8726-MX

Der Amlogic AML8726-M ist ein günstiger SoC für Tablets und Smartphones aus 2012. Er integriert zwei ARM Cortex-A9 Kerne (max. 1,5 GHz) mit NEON Erweiterung und eine ARM Mali-400 MP2 Grafikkarte. Auch 1080p Video Dekodierung wird von dem Chip unterstützt.

show full text
ModelGoogle Tensor G4Amlogic AML8726-MX
SeriesGoogle
Serie:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Google Tensor G4 « 1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
Clock1950 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 8
1 x ARM Cortex-A520
3 x ARM Cortex-A720
4 x ARM Cortex-X4		2 / 2
Technology4 nm45 nm
iGPUARM Mali-G715 MP7
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
L2 Cache512 KB
FeaturesNEON, VFP, Cortex-A9
Manufacturerwww.amlogic.com

Benchmarks

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 267     avg: 268.5     median: 268.5 (2%)     max: 270 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 958     avg: 963     median: 963 (9%)     max: 968 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1409     avg: 1451     median: 1450.5 (3%)     max: 1492 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 825     avg: 840     median: 839.5 (2%)     max: 854 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1000     avg: 1021     median: 1020.5 (3%)     max: 1041 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 63.9     avg: 86.6     median: 84.2 (3%)     max: 111.8 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 50.7     avg: 57.9     median: 52.9 (5%)     max: 70.1 MFLOPS
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1243     avg: 1336     median: 1252 (12%)     max: 1513 ms
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 3947     avg: 4055     median: 4055 (9%)     max: 4163 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 4082     avg: 4886     median: 4886 (32%)     max: 5690 Points

Average Benchmarks Amlogic AML8726-MX → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 09. 04:21:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18012 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3611 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728440503s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 07 Oct 2024 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.027s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18012 +0.001s ... 0.028s

#8 got single benchmarks 18012 +0s ... 0.028s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3611 +0.001s ... 0.029s

#10 got single benchmarks 3611 +0.004s ... 0.033s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.038s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.041s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)