Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC Tangula T700 vs Mediatek MT6739WW

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison UNISOC Tangula T700

Der Unisoc Tangula T700 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1.8 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. er bietet ähnliche Spezifikationen wie der Unisoc Tiger T618 bzw T610.

Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Zudem ist die Nutzung von 90-Hz-Bildschirmen möglich. Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP2 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

Mediatek MT6739WW

► remove from comparison MT6739WW

Der Mediatek MT6739WW ist ein 2017 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Einstiegsklasse, der primär in Smartphones (hauptsächlich Android) zu finden ist. Er verfügt über vier CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur, die mit maximal 1,5 GHz takten. Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine PowerVR GE8100 mit maximal 570 MHz Taktrate zum Einsatz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem (Cat. 4 DL / Cat 5 UL), WLAN 802.11 a/b/g/n sowie ein Videodecoder mit Ultra-HD- und H.265-Unterstützung. Der Unterschied zum normalen Mediatek MT6739 ist nicht bekannt, die Leistung ist vergleichbar.

show full text
ModelUNISOC Tangula T700Mediatek MT6739WW
SeriesUNISOC Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 « 1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW « 1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1800 - 1800 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology12 nm28 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP4G LTE (Cat. 4), HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, EDGE, WLAN (2,4 + 5 GHz), Bluetooth, GPS, FM receiver, H.265 Decoder, ARM Mali-T760 MP2 GPU
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP2PowerVR GE8100 ( - 570 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
0.5 pt (37%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -66%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 -3%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 -3%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 -3%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4725 -2%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 -1%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 -1%
UNISOC T618
0.475 -1%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 0%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 0%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
0.4915 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
0.516 7%
Mediatek Helio P70
0.517 8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
0.53 10%
Mediatek Helio P90
0.546 14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
0.552 15%
Mediatek Helio G90T
0.571 19%
MediaTek Dimensity 720
0.575 20%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 170%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
10230 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (34%)     max: 2961 Points
655 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (33%)     max: 2961 Points
669 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (14%)     max: 356 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (2%)     max: 1393 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
589 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1718 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
614 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1681 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
1525 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
549 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
653 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1791 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2544 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1355 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
1788 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3722 ms (4%)
16008 ms (19%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
10382 Points (9%)
3213 Points (3%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
65 Points (14%)
27 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
3565 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
14593 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
3084 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
22448 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
43690 Points (8%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
44936 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
37643 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
36709 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
67597 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
186885 Points (18%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
164867 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
65438 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
2078 Points (0%)
49040 Points (6%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
10033 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (36%)     max: 8746 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5412 Points (29%)
2260 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
12328 Points (26%)
1839 Points (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
8438 Points (55%)
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
4408 Points (22%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (2%)     max: 8.02 Watt

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6739WW → 284% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 10. 03:55:15

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11387 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731207314s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.032s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#8 got single benchmarks 13247 +0.005s ... 0.04s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11387 +0.001s ... 0.041s

#10 got single benchmarks 11387 +0.004s ... 0.045s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.02s ... 0.065s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.065s

#14 return log +0.002s ... 0.068s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)