Notebookcheck Logo

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz vs Intel Core i9-9900T vs HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz

► remove from comparison TCC8803 1GHz

ARM Mali 2D/3D graphics accelerator, DDR / DDR2 / LP-DDR2 / LP-DDR2 memory interface, LVDS Transmitter, HDMI 1.4, Composite TV-Out (NTSC / PAL), USB 2.0 HS OTG, USB 2.0 host, USB 1.1 HOST, EHI (External Host Interface), UART, NAND Flash Interface

Telechips' TCC88xx application processor will redefine the mobile device of tomorrow with new' innovative user experience by PC-like web browsing, 1080p full HD video record & playback, intuitive user interfaces, location based services and next generation social networking applications. TCC88xx supports development of planned features for the Tablet PC and HMP of tomorrow with tremendous performance and programmability to support new applications yet to be imagined. TCC88xx is equipped with hardwired VPU/GPU/ISP to maximize multimedia experience at its peak level.

 

Intel Core i9-9900T

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9900T

Der Intel Core i9-9900T ist eine High-End-CPU mit acht Kernen auf Basis der Coffee Lake-Architektur, die im Oktober 2018 vorgestellt wurde. Im Vergleich zum deutlich schneller getakteten Core i9-9900K, ist der 9900T mit einem deutlich niedrigeren TDP spezifiziert. Der Prozessor taktet mit 2,1 - 4,4 GHz und kann dank Hyperthreading bis zu 16 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Inter Core i9-9900T im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++).

Performance

Durch die acht CPU-Kerne bietet die CPU trotz der geringeren Taktung eine ordentliche Multi-Threaded-Leistung. Die Single-Core Leistung ist aufgrund des relativ hohen Turbo von bis zu 4,4 GHz relativ schnell. Wie immer ist die Leistung aber stark von der Kühlung abhängig. Im Idealfall hällt der 9900T mit den schnellen 6-Kernern der Vorgängergeneration mit.

Grafikeinheit

Die nun als Intel UHD Graphics 630 bezeichnete iGPU taktet mit 1.200 MHz genauso schnell wie zuvor. somit ist kein nennenswerter Performancevorteil zu erwarten. Als Low-End-Lösung können aktuelle Videospiele, wenn überhaupt, lediglich in verminderter Detailstufe flüssig wiedergegeben werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power auf 35 Watt und damit deutlich unter den 95 Watt des 9900K. Dadurch kann man deutlich kleinere und schwächere Kühllösungen nutzen.

HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620

► remove from comparison

Coretex A9 Quad-Core - max 1.5 GHz, im Huawei Mediapad 10 FHD mit 1.2 GHz

show full text
ModelTelechips TCC8803 1GHzIntel Core i9-9900THiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620
Series Intel Coffee Lake
Serie:
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T « 2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 « 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Clock1000 MHz2100 - 4400 MHz1200 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 18 / 164 / 4
Technology65 nm14++ nm40 nm
ArchitectureARMx86ARM
Announced
CodenameCoffee Lake-R
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB
L3 Cache16 MB
TDP35 Watt
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProARMv7
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
$439 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900T
29.9 pt (50%)
Intel Core i9-9900T
29.9
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 101%
0%
100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
440 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2626 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1112 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
185 Points (52%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
12.4 Points (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6758 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31357 Points (23%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
162.1 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6109 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
35084 MIPS (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4894 MIPS (58%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
70.3 fps (24%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
173.4 fps (40%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
5.5 fps (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.6 GB/s (12%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
422 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.9 sec (41%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10259 Points (22%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
481 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4080 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
12668 Points (10%)
min: 3209     avg: 4477     median: 4894 (4%)     max: 5167 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
12727 Points (10%)
min: 5354     avg: 5357     median: 5357 (4%)     max: 5360 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13200 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3268 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
13365 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5870 Points (25%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1206 Points (47%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
5888 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1193 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5875 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5381 Points (54%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
23223 Points (23%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1094 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
327 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 439     avg: 489.9     median: 500 (4%)     max: 547 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 940     avg: 1187     median: 1218 (11%)     max: 1290 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1793     avg: 2360     median: 2351 (5%)     max: 2731 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1000     avg: 1317     median: 1275 (3%)     max: 1591 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1209     avg: 1573     median: 1557 (4%)     max: 1819 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
13.4 MFLOPS (1%)
min: 37.8     avg: 44.2     median: 46.6 (5%)     max: 48.71 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 92.3     avg: 133.3     median: 138.1 (5%)     max: 151.8 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
878 ms (1%)
26477 ms (31%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 856     avg: 2197     median: 1610 (18%)     max: 4026 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1522     avg: 1643     median: 1540 (15%)     max: 2080 ms
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
197 Points (36%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 4404     avg: 4736     median: 4736 (11%)     max: 5068 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 4820     avg: 5667     median: 5662 (37%)     max: 6713 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
14434 Points (34%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 92     avg: 191     median: 191 (6%)     max: 290 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 8740     avg: 8897     median: 8897 (29%)     max: 9054 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 8223     avg: 8737     median: 8678 (1%)     max: 9118 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
65.2 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
57 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
19.5 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Telechips TCC8803 1GHz → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900T → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 15. 00:44:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3327 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12027 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 3613 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731627878s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.031s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3327 +0.001s ... 0.032s

#9 got single benchmarks 3327 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12027 +0.007s ... 0.042s

#11 got single benchmarks 12027 +0.003s ... 0.045s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3613 +0.001s ... 0.046s

#13 got single benchmarks 3613 +0.006s ... 0.052s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.089s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.089s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)