Notebookcheck Logo

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz vs Intel Core i9-9900K

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz

► remove from comparison TCC8803 1GHz

ARM Mali 2D/3D graphics accelerator, DDR / DDR2 / LP-DDR2 / LP-DDR2 memory interface, LVDS Transmitter, HDMI 1.4, Composite TV-Out (NTSC / PAL), USB 2.0 HS OTG, USB 2.0 host, USB 1.1 HOST, EHI (External Host Interface), UART, NAND Flash Interface

Telechips' TCC88xx application processor will redefine the mobile device of tomorrow with new' innovative user experience by PC-like web browsing, 1080p full HD video record & playback, intuitive user interfaces, location based services and next generation social networking applications. TCC88xx supports development of planned features for the Tablet PC and HMP of tomorrow with tremendous performance and programmability to support new applications yet to be imagined. TCC88xx is equipped with hardwired VPU/GPU/ISP to maximize multimedia experience at its peak level.

 

Intel Core i9-9900K

Der Intel Core i9-9900K ist eine High-End-CPU mit acht Kernen auf Basis der Coffee Lake-Architektur, die im Oktober 2018 vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 3,6-5,0 GHz und kann dank Hyperthreading bis zu 16 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird das Inter Core i9-9900K im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++). Dank des freien Multiplikators lässt sich der Prozessor vergleichsweise einfach übertakten. Voraussetzung hierfür ist jedoch ein Mainboard mit Z390 Chipsatz.

Performance

Durch die zwei zusätzlichen Rechenkerne steigt die Performance bei Ausnutzung aller Kerne im Vergleich zum Core i7-8700K um ca. 25 Prozent. Die Single-Core-Leistung konnte aufgrund der erhöhten Turbotaktraten leicht gesteigert werden. Als High-End-Modell ist der i9-9900K auch für anspruchsvollste Anwendungen und Videospiele geeignet.

Grafikeinheit

Die nun als Intel UHD Graphics 630 bezeichnete iGPU taktet mit 1.200 MHz genauso schnell wie zuvor. somit ist kein nennenswerter Performancevorteil zu erwarten. Als Low-End-Lösung können aktuelle Videospiele, wenn überhaupt, lediglich in verminderter Detailstufe flüssig wiedergegeben werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power auf 95 Watt. Entsprechend dimensionierte Kühlsysteme dürften die entstehende Abwärme im Normalbetrieb problemlos abführen können. Beim Übertakten gönnt sich die CPU aber schnell 200 Watt und mehr. Hier sollte eine deutlich leistungsstärkere Kühlung zum Einsatz kommen.

show full text
ModelTelechips TCC8803 1GHzIntel Core i9-9900K
Series Intel Coffee Lake
Serie: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Google Tensor G4 compare1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K « 3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F compare2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock1000 MHz3600 - 5000 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 18 / 16
Technology65 nm14++ nm
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
CodenameCoffee Lake-R
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB
L3 Cache16 MB
TDP95 Watt
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
$488 U.S.
Manufacturerwww.intel.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900K
33.5 pt (56%)
Intel Core i9-9900K
33.5
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 79%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
12397 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1280 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 495     avg: 502     median: 502 (56%)     max: 509 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4816     avg: 4871     median: 4871 (12%)     max: 4926 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1623     avg: 1939     median: 1979 (12%)     max: 2040 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 203     avg: 210.6     median: 212 (60%)     max: 218 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 17.37     avg: 20.7     median: 21.4 (28%)     max: 21.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.33     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (57%)     max: 2.44 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7786     avg: 7924     median: 7933 (48%)     max: 8042 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 36683     avg: 45846     median: 48778.5 (35%)     max: 49142 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 63009     avg: 63708     median: 63976 (41%)     max: 64138 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 10167     avg: 10218     median: 10192 (12%)     max: 10294 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 85.6     avg: 91.9     median: 91.3 (1%)     max: 98.7 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.276     avg: 4     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 5.203 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7315     avg: 7775     median: 7633 (12%)     max: 8518 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 43248     avg: 48207     median: 48207 (28%)     max: 53166 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5311     avg: 5411     median: 5410.5 (64%)     max: 5510 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 90.9     avg: 110     median: 114.3 (38%)     max: 120.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 252.7     avg: 260.9     median: 260.5 (60%)     max: 270 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.36     avg: 14.8     median: 15.8 (28%)     max: 16.3 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.8     avg: 1.1     median: 1.2 (34%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.3     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.8     avg: 10.4     median: 11.1 (29%)     max: 11.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 219.2     avg: 239.7     median: 223.8 (2%)     max: 276.1 Seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10312     avg: 13253     median: 14281.5 (30%)     max: 14409 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.545     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 7.823 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.73     avg: 17     median: 16.9 (1%)     max: 17.25 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 413.8     avg: 429.5     median: 432.2 (2%)     max: 440 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 58733     avg: 65154     median: 65153.5 (50%)     max: 71574 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 16598     avg: 17566     median: 17264 (44%)     max: 19169 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 64697     avg: 67569     median: 67554.5 (55%)     max: 72059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 67420     avg: 68874     median: 67813 (55%)     max: 72450 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 67259     avg: 68959     median: 68173.5 (57%)     max: 72229 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16435     avg: 17955     median: 17969 (45%)     max: 18694 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21585     avg: 24141     median: 24497.5 (44%)     max: 25010 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9413     avg: 10630     median: 10593 (45%)     max: 11298 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1300 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
8845 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6014     avg: 6113     median: 6049 (60%)     max: 6339 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 26616     avg: 31703     median: 32981 (33%)     max: 34233 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
13.4 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 919     avg: 937     median: 924 (1%)     max: 968 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
71 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 38473     avg: 40081     median: 40081 (33%)     max: 41689 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
202 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
203.2 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Telechips TCC8803 1GHz → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900K → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 14. 18:58:48

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3327 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10442 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731607128s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.033s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3327 +0.001s ... 0.033s

#8 got single benchmarks 3327 +0s ... 0.034s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10442 +0.01s ... 0.043s

#10 got single benchmarks 10442 +0.018s ... 0.061s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.033s ... 0.095s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.097s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)