Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9400

Intel Core 2 Duo T8300

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 war zur Zeit der Erscheinung ein schneller Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den Penryn Kern. Er bietet jedoch nur 3MB Level 2 Cache.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9400

► remove from comparison Intel T9400

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der oberen Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der Prozessor ist gleich schnell wie der sparsamere Core 2 Duo P9500 (25 Watt TDP).

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo T9400 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.53 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo P9500 und dadurch sollte sie für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T8300Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
CodenamePenrynPenryn
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 « 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 « 2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2400 MHz2530 MHz
FSB8001066
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm45 nm
Voltage1-1.25V V1.050V-1.162V V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478BGA479, PGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$241 U.S.$316 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2406     avg: 2612     median: 2626 (16%)     max: 2704 Points
min: 2713     avg: 2848     median: 2818 (17%)     max: 3207 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3918     avg: 4773     median: 4837 (4%)     max: 4965 Points
min: 5008     avg: 5341     median: 5267.5 (4%)     max: 6173 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T9400 +
1641 s (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 30.1     avg: 37.7     median: 31 (6%)     max: 52.1 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1986     avg: 2121     median: 2143 (5%)     max: 2181 Points
min: 2026     avg: 2262     median: 2304 (5%)     max: 2349 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21 s
min: 17.75     avg: 18.1     median: 18.1 (4%)     max: 18.55 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 50     avg: 50.5     median: 50.5 (2%)     max: 51 s
min: 42.53     avg: 43.1     median: 43 (2%)     max: 44.02 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1206 s (5%)
min: 1107     avg: 1150     median: 1164 (5%)     max: 1180 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
22062 MIPS (10%)
23652 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
17583 MFLOPS (13%)
17818 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4358     avg: 5255     median: 5311 (11%)     max: 6090 Points
min: 2293     avg: 5930     median: 6175 (13%)     max: 7555 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
min: 4     avg: 5.1     median: 5.3 (76%)     max: 5.4 Points
5.4 Points (77%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
4628 Points (4%)
min: 3066     avg: 4502     median: 4892 (4%)     max: 5156 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 → 108% n=11

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 18. 13:12:04

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 379 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 393 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734523924s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 16 Dec 2024 05:18:38 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 379 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#8 got single benchmarks 379 +0.012s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 393 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 393 +0.018s ... 0.034s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.044s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.047s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)