Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Duo T7700 war der schnellste Merom basierte Core 2 Duo mit 35 Watt TDP. Die Penryn Nachfolger (z.B. Core 2 Duo T8300) waren bei gleichem Takt minimal schneller.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den alten Merom Kern mit lediglich 2 MB Level 2 Cache. Er bietet keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und ist mit 2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7700Intel Core 2 Duo T5870
CodenameMeromMerom
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 « 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2400 MHz2000 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$307 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Voltage1.075V-1.175V V

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2505     avg: 2553     median: 2553.5 (15%)     max: 2598 Points
min: 1875     avg: 2092     median: 2088.5 (13%)     max: 2316 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4573     avg: 4620     median: 4620 (3%)     max: 4665 Points
min: 3480     avg: 3855     median: 3809.5 (3%)     max: 4319 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 1355     avg: 1916     median: 1915.5 (23%)     max: 2476 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 42.47     avg: 60     median: 60 (12%)     max: 77.6 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1946     avg: 2040     median: 2058 (4%)     max: 2108 Points
min: 1560     avg: 1606     median: 1628 (3%)     max: 1630 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21.74 s
min: 26.78     avg: 27.4     median: 27 (6%)     max: 28.27 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 49.55     avg: 52     median: 52.2 (2%)     max: 54 s
min: 61.8     avg: 63.9     median: 63.9 (3%)     max: 66 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1266 s (6%)
1492 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
22156 MIPS (11%)
16620 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
15341 MFLOPS (12%)
12000 MFLOPS (9%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4014     avg: 5302     median: 5400.5 (11%)     max: 6458 Points
min: 3903     avg: 3926     median: 3925.5 (8%)     max: 3948 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7700 +
5.3 Points (76%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T5870 +
4.9 Points (63%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 → 79% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 21. 15:29:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 323 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 442 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732199363s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 323 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#8 got single benchmarks 323 +0.012s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 442 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 442 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.029s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.031s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)