Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

Intel Core 2 Duo T7400

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Duo T7400 ist ein Notebook-Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den Merom Kern. In 2006 war die Leistung in der gehobenen Mittelklasse einzustufen, 2010 ist er nur noch als Einstiegsprozessor zu sehen. Die später erschienen auf Penryn Kern basierenden Core 2 Duo sind sparsamer und bei gleichem Takt etwas schneller. Daher ist der T7400 knapp unter einem Core 2 Duo P7450 einzuordnen.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 ist ein auf den Merom Kern basierender Doppelkern Prozessor für Notebooks. Er wurde später von dem in 45nm gefertigten und gleichgetakteten Core 2 Duo T6600 abgelöst. Durch Verbesserungen im Kern ist dieser auch etwas schneller.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7400Intel Core 2 Duo T5900
CodenameMeromMerom
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 « 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 « 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2160 MHz2200 MHz
FSB667800
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm
Voltage1.0375-1.3V V
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478Socket P
Architecturex86x86
$286 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5900 +
min: 2116     avg: 2123     median: 2123 (13%)     max: 2130 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5900 +
min: 3894     avg: 3997     median: 3997 (3%)     max: 4100 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1633     avg: 1817     median: 1861 (4%)     max: 1895 Points
min: 1838     avg: 1864     median: 1864 (4%)     max: 1890 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7400 +
257 Points (99%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23     avg: 24     median: 24 (5%)     max: 25 s
26 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 58     avg: 59.3     median: 58 (2%)     max: 62 s
65 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 1523     avg: 1531     median: 1531 (7%)     max: 1539 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 13249     avg: 18264     median: 18263.5 (9%)     max: 23278 MIPS
18700 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 9696     avg: 12732     median: 12732 (10%)     max: 15768 MFLOPS
14000 MFLOPS (11%)
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7400 +
683 Points (47%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7400 +
2230 Points (92%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7400 +
2080 Points (94%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 7174     avg: 7329     median: 7376 (99%)     max: 7438 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3716     avg: 4445     median: 4683 (10%)     max: 4859 Points
4639 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → 99% n=6

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 22. 02:40:59

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734831659s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:18:43 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#8 got single benchmarks 164 +0.009s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 439 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.026s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.028s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)