Notebookcheck Logo

Unisoc T7255 vs UNISOC T610

Unisoc T7255

► remove from comparison UNISOC T7255

Der Unisoc T7255 (ehemals Unisoc T616) ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei großen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 2 GHz Taktrate und 6 kleinen Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Dual-Core-ISP (24, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x-1.866. Die integrierte ARM Mali G57 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt.

UNISOC T610

► remove from comparison UNISOC T610

Der Unisoc T610 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1,8 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0 (24, 8, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 933 MHz und LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP2 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und 614 MHz Taktung und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

show full text
ModelUnisoc T7255UNISOC T610
SeriesUNISOC UNISOC
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Serie: Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7255 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7225 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7200 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72551.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7225 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7200 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP1 (750 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (614 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - T610
0.5 pt (36%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -65%
...
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 -28%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 -28%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 -20%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 -11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 -5%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 -5%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 -1%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 0%
UNISOC T610
0.4653
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 1%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4725 2%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 2%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 2%
UNISOC T618
0.475 2%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 3%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 3%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809 3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 3%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 179%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2798     avg: 2956     median: 2990 (35%)     max: 3036 Points
min: 2784     avg: 2944     median: 2848 (34%)     max: 3200 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2798     avg: 2954     median: 3002 (34%)     max: 3063 Points
min: 2791     avg: 2986     median: 2986 (34%)     max: 3181 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 427     avg: 433.5     median: 433.5 (11%)     max: 440 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 1474     avg: 1556     median: 1572 (6%)     max: 1606 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 298     avg: 350.9     median: 360 (14%)     max: 380 Points
min: 345     avg: 357.3     median: 348.5 (14%)     max: 387 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1184     avg: 1410     median: 1464 (3%)     max: 1502 Points
min: 1034     avg: 1264     median: 1298.5 (2%)     max: 1425 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 1663     avg: 1734     median: 1734 (17%)     max: 1805 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 5131     avg: 5378     median: 5377.5 (5%)     max: 5624 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T7255 +
5574 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T7255 +
1737 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2530.7     avg: 2711     median: 2650.4 (3%)     max: 3013.8 ms
3075 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 12141     avg: 14092     median: 14522 (12%)     max: 15304 Points
11952 Points (10%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 45     avg: 55     median: 57.5 (16%)     max: 60 Points
53 Points (15%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 68     avg: 78     median: 80 (15%)     max: 86 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
200006 Points (19%)
min: 171346     avg: 173534     median: 173534 (17%)     max: 175722 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 T610 +
39058 Points (33%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 T610 +
39644 Points (32%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 T610 +
27469 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 T610 +
65175 Points (24%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 228124     avg: 230591     median: 229582 (14%)     max: 235075 Points
min: 162968     avg: 181377     median: 181377 (11%)     max: 199786 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 67445     avg: 69296     median: 69214 (19%)     max: 71312 Points
min: 62063     avg: 63978     median: 63977.5 (18%)     max: 65892 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 3040     avg: 3123     median: 3122.5 (0%)     max: 3205 Points
1942 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 52.5     avg: 53.7     median: 53.7 (39%)     max: 54.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 192.9     avg: 197     median: 197 (6%)     max: 201 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 17.7     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (23%)     max: 20.4 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 199.3     avg: 213.7     median: 213.7 (6%)     max: 228 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 11341     avg: 17154     median: 13300 (21%)     max: 24988 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 7936     avg: 8004     median: 8011 (33%)     max: 8066 Points
101%
T610 +
min: 7645     avg: 8075     median: 8074.5 (34%)     max: 8504 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 T610 +
5364 Points (28%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 T610 +
16046 Points (34%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 T610 +
7337 Points (48%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 382     avg: 388     median: 388 (15%)     max: 394 Points
356 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 3.47     avg: 5.9     median: 5.8 (3%)     max: 8.44 Watt
68%
1 T610 +
8.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T7255 +
min: 0.91     avg: 1.2     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 1.398 Watt
62%
1 T610 +
2 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Unisoc T7255 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T610 → 89% n=13

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 19. 23:33:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14016 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14014 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732055611s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14016 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#8 got single benchmarks 14016 +0.009s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14014 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 14014 +0s ... 0.014s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.028s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.031s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)