Notebookcheck Logo

Unisoc T7225 vs HiSilicon Hi6262 vs DK3.5+ST

Unisoc T7225

► remove from comparison UNISOC T7225

Das Unisoc T7225 (ehemals Unisoc T612) ist ein SoC der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz Taktrate und 6 stromsparenden Cortex-A55-Kernen, ebenfalls mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. 

Das T7225 kommt mit einem LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 933 MHz und LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz.

Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kern, 16 Shading Units und 614 MHz Taktung. Hier liegt auch der einzige Unterschied zum Unisoc Tiger T610: Die Grafikkarte besitzt beim T7225 einen Kern weniger.

Das Unisoc Tiger T7225 wird bei TSMC im 12nm-FinFet-Prozess hergestellt.

HiSilicon Hi6262

► remove from comparison

DK3.5+ST

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelUnisoc T7225HiSilicon Hi6262DK3.5+ST
SeriesUNISOC HiSilicon Huawei
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55
Serie:
UNISOC T6191.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6182 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7225 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72001.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 «  cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST « 2 cores
unknown cores
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 82
Technology12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP1 (614 MHz)
ArchitectureARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.unisoc.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 2909     avg: 2944     median: 2939 (35%)     max: 2990 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 2933     avg: 2938     median: 2937.5 (34%)     max: 2942 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 344     avg: 346     median: 346 (14%)     max: 347 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 1311     avg: 1340     median: 1323 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T7225 +
5404 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T7225 +
1598 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 T7225 +
2973 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 T7225 +
12581 Points (10%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T7225 +
46 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 T7225 +
73 Points (13%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T7225 +
196368 Points (12%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T7225 +
68374 Points (19%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 T7225 +
2969 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 11681     avg: 13404     median: 13404 (21%)     max: 15127 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 6566     avg: 7419     median: 7610 (32%)     max: 7776 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T7225 +
365 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 3.37     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 6.99 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T7225 +
min: 1.121     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.68 Watt

Average Benchmarks Unisoc T7225 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 16. 22:20:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14386 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13241 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12765 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731792018s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.031s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14386 +0.001s ... 0.032s

#9 got single benchmarks 14386 +0.008s ... 0.04s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13241 +0.001s ... 0.041s

#11 got single benchmarks 13241 +0.003s ... 0.044s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12765 +0.001s ... 0.044s

#13 got single benchmarks 12765 +0.003s ... 0.048s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.056s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.056s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)