Notebookcheck Logo

Unisoc T7200 vs Rockchip RK3168 vs ARM Cortex-M4

Unisoc T7200

► remove from comparison UNISOC T7200

Der Unisoc T7200 (ehemals Unisoc T606) ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei großen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1,6 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit ebenfalls bis zu 1,6 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0 (24, 8, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G57 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kerne und 650 MHz Taktung und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

Rockchip RK3168

► remove from comparison

Der Rockchip RK3168 ist ein günstiger ARM-SoC, der in erster Linie für Smartphones konzipiert wurde. Er bietet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 CPU-Kerne mit NEON-Erweiterung, eine PowerVR SGX 540 Grafikkarte (400 MHz) und einen Speichercontroller für (LP-)DDR2/DDR3. Die Performance sollte mit anderen, ähnlich getakteten Cortex-A9-SoCs wie dem Samsung Exynos 4210 vergleichbar sein. Dank fortschrittlicher 28-Nanometer-Fertigung dürfte der RK3168 aber deutlich weniger Energie benötigen und somit längere Akkulaufzeiten ermöglichen.

ModelUnisoc T7200Rockchip RK3168ARM Cortex-M4
SeriesUNISOC
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55
Serie:
UNISOC T6191.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6182 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72251.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7200 « 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 «  cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
Clock1600 MHz1200 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 82 / 2
Technology12 nm28 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPPowerVR SGX 540 (400 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP1 (650 MHz)PowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.rock-chips.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 2489     avg: 2604     median: 2626 (30%)     max: 2673 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 368     avg: 375.4     median: 377 (10%)     max: 380 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 1285     avg: 1364     median: 1364 (5%)     max: 1482 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 2903.5     avg: 3045     median: 3017.2 (4%)     max: 3186.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 2228     avg: 11332     median: 12296 (10%)     max: 13455 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 51     avg: 52.6     median: 52 (15%)     max: 56 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 70     avg: 77.8     median: 77.5 (14%)     max: 86 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 T7200 +
155928 Points (15%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 202973     avg: 221439     median: 217160 (13%)     max: 238808 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 59826     avg: 64551     median: 61167.5 (17%)     max: 82626 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 T7200 +
1218 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 20.9     avg: 50.9     median: 57.6 (42%)     max: 69.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 154.5     avg: 351.3     median: 197.5 (6%)     max: 703 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 16.4     avg: 25.5     median: 25.3 (31%)     max: 42.1 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 192.4     avg: 574     median: 675 (19%)     max: 824 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 8373     avg: 16495     median: 17396 (28%)     max: 25251 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 T7200 +
4923 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 T7200 +
10422 Points (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 T7200 +
7100 Points (46%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 339     avg: 349.4     median: 348 (13%)     max: 362 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 2.68     avg: 4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 6.55 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 0.991     avg: 1.6     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 3.12 Watt

Average Benchmarks Unisoc T7200 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 16. 23:02:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14018 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4129 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 13222 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731794556s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14018 +0s ... 0.003s

#9 got single benchmarks 14018 +0.003s ... 0.006s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 4129 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#11 got single benchmarks 4129 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 13222 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#13 got single benchmarks 13222 +0.003s ... 0.013s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.021s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.021s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)