Notebookcheck Logo

Unisoc T7200 vs HiSilicon Hi6262 vs UNISOC Tangula T700

Unisoc T7200

► remove from comparison UNISOC T7200

Der Unisoc T7200 (ehemals Unisoc T606) ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei großen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1,6 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit ebenfalls bis zu 1,6 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0 (24, 8, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G57 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kerne und 650 MHz Taktung und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

HiSilicon Hi6262

► remove from comparison

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison UNISOC Tangula T700

Der Unisoc Tangula T700 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1.8 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. er bietet ähnliche Spezifikationen wie der Unisoc Tiger T618 bzw T610.

Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Zudem ist die Nutzung von 90-Hz-Bildschirmen möglich. Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP2 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

show full text
ModelUnisoc T7200HiSilicon Hi6262UNISOC Tangula T700
SeriesUNISOC HiSilicon UNISOC
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Serie: Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6191.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6182 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72251.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7200 « 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 «  cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
UNISOC T6191.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6182 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72251.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72001.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 « 1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1600 MHz1800 - 1800 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP1 (650 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
0.5 pt (37%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -66%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 -3%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 -3%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 -3%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4725 -2%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 -1%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 -1%
UNISOC T618
0.475 -1%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 0%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 0%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
0.4915 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
0.516 7%
Mediatek Helio P70
0.517 8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
0.53 10%
Mediatek Helio P90
0.546 14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
0.552 15%
Mediatek Helio G90T
0.571 19%
MediaTek Dimensity 720
0.575 20%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 170%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 2484     avg: 2625     median: 2648.5 (31%)     max: 2697 Points
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (34%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 2489     avg: 2604     median: 2626 (30%)     max: 2673 Points
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (33%)     max: 2961 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 368     avg: 375.4     median: 377 (10%)     max: 380 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 1285     avg: 1364     median: 1364 (5%)     max: 1482 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 273     avg: 305.9     median: 309 (12%)     max: 313 Points
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (14%)     max: 356 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 708     avg: 1206     median: 1245 (2%)     max: 1324 Points
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (2%)     max: 1393 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 2903.5     avg: 3045     median: 3017.2 (4%)     max: 3186.8 ms
3722 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 2228     avg: 11332     median: 12296 (10%)     max: 13455 Points
10382 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 51     avg: 52.6     median: 52 (15%)     max: 56 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 70     avg: 77.8     median: 77.5 (14%)     max: 86 Points
65 Points (12%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 T7200 +
155928 Points (15%)
186885 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
44936 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
37643 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
36709 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
67597 Points (24%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 202973     avg: 221439     median: 217160 (13%)     max: 238808 Points
164867 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 59826     avg: 64551     median: 61167.5 (17%)     max: 82626 Points
65438 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 T7200 +
1218 Points (0%)
2078 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 20.9     avg: 50.9     median: 57.6 (42%)     max: 69.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 154.5     avg: 351.3     median: 197.5 (6%)     max: 703 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 16.4     avg: 25.5     median: 25.3 (31%)     max: 42.1 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 192.4     avg: 574     median: 675 (19%)     max: 824 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 8373     avg: 16495     median: 17396 (28%)     max: 25251 Points
10033 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 6637     avg: 7338     median: 7259 (30%)     max: 8303 Points
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (36%)     max: 8746 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 T7200 +
4923 Points (26%)
5412 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 T7200 +
10422 Points (22%)
12328 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 T7200 +
7100 Points (46%)
8438 Points (55%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 339     avg: 349.4     median: 348 (13%)     max: 362 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 2.68     avg: 4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 6.55 Watt
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (2%)     max: 8.02 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 0.991     avg: 1.6     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 3.12 Watt

Average Benchmarks Unisoc T7200 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 16. 23:39:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14018 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13241 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731796771s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14018 +0s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 14018 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13241 +0s ... 0.008s

#11 got single benchmarks 13241 +0s ... 0.008s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#13 got single benchmarks 13247 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.031s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.031s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)