Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

Intel Core 2 Duo T7100

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 war zur Zeit des Erscheinens ein Mittelklasse Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den älteren Merom Kern (später von dem schnelleren Penryn Kern abgelöst) und bietet die nur den halbierten Level 2 Cache mit 2 MB. Wie der T7200 bietet der T7100 Virtualization VT-x Funktionen, jedoch ist der T7200 aufgrund des 4 MB Cache und der höhere Taktfrequenz etwas schneller.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den alten Merom Kern mit lediglich 2 MB Level 2 Cache. Er bietet keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und ist mit 2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7100Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 « 1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1800 MHz2000 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C85 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PPGA478
FeaturesSpeedStep, Virtualization Technology VT-x, Execute Disable BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86
$197 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1817 Points (11%)
min: 1988     avg: 2000     median: 2000 (12%)     max: 2013 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3419 Points (2%)
min: 3714     avg: 3755     median: 3716 (3%)     max: 3835 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1358     avg: 1500     median: 1535.5 (3%)     max: 1550 Points
min: 1629     avg: 1640     median: 1639.5 (3%)     max: 1650 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
31 s (7%)
min: 28.06     avg: 28.5     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
71 s (3%)
min: 69.6     avg: 90.3     median: 90.3 (4%)     max: 111 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1614 s (7%)
min: 1511     avg: 1521     median: 1520.5 (7%)     max: 1530 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 16039     avg: 16240     median: 16239.5 (8%)     max: 16440 MIPS
min: 11028     avg: 14012     median: 14011.5 (7%)     max: 16995 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 11409     avg: 11484     median: 11483.5 (9%)     max: 11558 MFLOPS
min: 7694     avg: 10270     median: 10270 (8%)     max: 12846 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3068     avg: 3956     median: 4040 (8%)     max: 4660 Points
min: 4286     avg: 4884     median: 5025 (10%)     max: 5340 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5800 +
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T5800 +
3533 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 → 102% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 15. 00:26:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 325 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 438 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731626809s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 325 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 325 +0.016s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 438 +0.001s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 438 +0.011s ... 0.031s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.041s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.043s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)